I think a lot were waiting to see, and may have believed 'collusion' was possible (perhaps wished for it given their distrust of Trump), but I doubt the majority were 'convinced' that Trump was working for Putin. At the same time, they were willing to argue against Trump supporter's statements of his innocence, something easy to do when you don't like Trump, or his supporters, when his innocence can't be proven - you can't disprove a false allegation, all you can do is wait for evidence to arrive to support the allegation...and wait, and wait, and wait.
Adam Schiff said he had direct evidence! 17 intelligence agencies stated that Russians hacked the DNC. The mainstream media for over 2 years had bombshell after bombshell, running commentary of the walls closing in OF COURSE people were convinced that Trump was compromised by Russia. The majority of people that trust the establishment had to be convinced. Although I thought they would've learned their lesson after the media blatantly gaslighting the public back with Hillary 2016.
(perhaps wished for it given their distrust of Trump)
There was enough evidence even just on Fox News for people to realize what was going on. But those same people think Fox (or any other truthful online source) is fake news.
I agree with the wishful thinking. But that is plain stupid. Especially when someone is falsifying the wishes with evidence.
No you don't. There is a YUGE set of circumstantial evidence pointing to a hit, but no hard evidence of a crime committed
If it was an inside hit, you think a fair investigation will take place showing us all the evidence? I wouldn't count on it. We're going to have to use some logical reasoning for this one.
no video ?, no witnesses :censored:...we have no evidence of a crime. Just a situation that screams that 'suicide' wasn't the reality.
No video - the cameras malfunctioned.
Let's speak to the guards - they were working overtime which led to them not following procedure - checking in every 30 mins,
One of the highest-profile criminal figures of this decade - who 2 weeks ago tried to kill himself - was taken OFF of suicide watch. Who made that decision?? Interview them on the news??
Additional procedure since he attempted suicide was to have an inmate with him. That inmate got transferred!
Autopsy? They said they need "further information". I thought the autopsy explains to us what happened?
Are they waiting for someone to give them the official story?
Don't we have a conspiracy thread for some of this stuff? While there is some conspiracy theory applicable to Epstein's death, the thread is about Epstein's death and not all around conspiracy stuff, no? Maybe I'm misunderstanding the thread given all the title changes that have been happening
Forgive me but I have to gloat a little. People have hid behind the "conspiracy" label for far too long when aiming to shut down threads of discussion that counter official mainstream reports. But this right here is where conspiracy meets reality (what's funny about this also is that one of the charges against Epstein was
conspiracy). How can anyone not suspect foul play here?? Even if he wasn't murdered he was allowed to kill himself which is basically the same thing. In this case Occam's Razor works in favor of the "conspiracy theorists". And hey just in time, you might have seen that they're now classifying conspiracy theorists as
domestic terrrorists. I guess anyone that doesn't buy this obvious BS is a danger to the establishment! "Believe what we say or you're a criminal"