• Current Events & Politics
    Welcome Guest
    Please read before posting:
    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • Current Events & Politics Moderators: deficiT | tryptakid | Foreigner

The 2018 Trump Presidency thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn't say it was good, that's just how it is.
Economy > environment for the time being.
There's no overnight switch to renewables.
They could've produced an electric/hydro-powered car 50 years ago. That would've been splendid.

I also don't deny climate change, the climate is obviously changing (see big fucking storm)
 
Economy > environment for the time being.
that's exactly the kind of selfish, short-term view shadowmeister highlights.

for me, the saddest thing of all is that this generation won't have to experience the full effects - but i guess future generations can look back from their once beautiful, fucked planet and console themselves with the fact that you had $75 more in your monthly paycheck and your 401k did gangbusters. "fuck you! the economy was more important at the time."

alasdair
 
I agree with all of this. So what did Obama do to switch us over to renewable energy? He had 8 years. He sold more oil.
 
I agree with all of this. So what did Obama do to switch us over to renewable energy? He had 8 years. He sold more oil.

Exactly. Obama had a lot of shortcomings, including scrapping the Hezbollah drug trafficking investigation. I don't like him, didn't vote for him either time and was glad to see him get the hell out of the white house.

But sacrificing the environment for short term money grabs? Disgusting. It'll only last a few years, then we'll be *still* 20 trillion in debt. JG do you realize there's only 80 trillion USD of wealth in the ENTIRE WORLD? What happens when the US gov't is in debt for the full 80 trillion? We would have to literally absorb the world's *entire wealth just to break even*

We're in a big pothole and we're never going to get out of it. "Economy great" = LIES as long as the gov't is in the hole 20 trillion. "Economy great" = LIES when over 10% of people are underemployed and there's a perpetual unemployment rate.

We're fucked, game over.

what did Obama do to switch us over to renewable energy?

A bunch of EPA changes that Pruitt (a soulless monster that makes Trump look like an angelic baby with wings) rolled back.

I, however, suspect you are already aware of this and are feigning ignorance.

I also don't deny climate change

I NEVER THOUGHT I WOULD FIND MYSELF SAYING THIS BUT... At least you're smarter than Trump then, who's also an anti-vaxxer. Tell me, do you at least believe in getting vaccinations?
 
TheLoveBandit said:
Actually, this is HUGE (should I say YUGE? :p) for me. I have always been interested in how non-Americans view our country. We're pretty insulated and self centered when it comes to ... well, everything. We don't get much news or reflection from outside our own media. So I've always loved to hear how others view us and our activities (I mean, we are in the spotlight and the center of the universe, are we not? LOL). Seriously, though, I recall a discussion on BL at one point (over a decade ago) expressing the difference in perception between an American and a European based upon the environment each grows up in and is exposed to. Americans are VERY limited, IMO. So, I greatly appreciate others' opinions, and understanding how those opinions are reached.

agreed, i do not limit it to just europeans and to those who have a negative view of us. i tend to think we can learn from others as much as they can learn from us (even if they hate us). haha, yes?! we are whether we like it or not, doesn't mean we are the center of the universe. we're still just planet earth ;). i think environmental factors are just one part of the equation as i take it on the outlook of the whole. i agree on americans being limited, i believe a lot of countries are, we all take time growing in understanding in our own ways.

TheLoveBandit said:
The odd part to this is the so called 'fourth branch'. This would be our news media who were viewed as impartial, investigative, and the eyes and ears of the public watching to ensure none of the three traditional branches were corrupt or stretching their authority. Unfortunately, I know going back to at least the 70's major news outlets would present their take on a situation which would actually become a slant as opposed to 'presenting the facts for the public to make their own decision'. It has gotten worse in the past decade or so. I won't use the term 'militarized' but you find media outlets that present one side of things as reality and do a significant disservice to the American public by omitting or clouding facts in order to support 'their side'. Note, I'm not claiming either 'side' is at fault of this...I believe BOTH are, and we are left with no real outlet for an impartial reporting of reality. This feeds back to my interest in views from outside the US.

the news sucks :p. sorry for being so final on it but i don't think they report the news as truth anymore, too much opinionating and selective story telling going on. they pull an Anchorman 2... sensationalism; much like super market tabloids, conspiracy theorists and "the church" have in the past to get people to pay attention to what they are putting out there. so i agree and i like the way you put it better, you smart people making the rest of us look like trumps! (seriously though i'm not done healing yet and would have put it much the way you did.)

this fourth branch to me is the people. all government is predicated off having people be apart of it. without those living in the land then that organization cannot exist. all social structures, governements, etc. are constructs that would not exist without people supporting it in some way.

so in america (to me) the fourth branch is the people holding power. we have the ability, right and occasional need to over throw the government in certain yet rare cases.

when i turned 18 i registered for the draft per law but not to vote. i still have not registered to this day, i feel out of place in discussions sometimes because of this leading some to think if you don't vote you have no say in anything. i think this is only half true. (much like how we can listen and learn from other nations and vice versa, as they don't vote on what happens here.) regardless of personal reasons as to why i don't vote the power of voting is within the common peoples hands. we elect officials on state and federal levels and we can determine who we want in these offices to make the best decisions. if we don't like them after they have proven themselves to be insufficient we can simply vote them out or vote someone else in.

and the third way the fourth branch of the people having the power is stated in the constitution - We The People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

funny how people often forget that these words were to govern ourselves, that so many people struggled to ensure the right to form that more perfect union and effort they put into it so that we could understand this for generations to come. it was written by a bunch of smart people but put into plain and simple words that were easy to understand for anyone back then, today and for future generations to come. it was also written in a way that kept all these freedoms from being taken from us by our own government as well as internal and external organizations.

without us keeping these truths to our country we are making the choice (out of negligence) not to work at it, which is just as bad as someone who is making the wrong choices intentionally. "it has been said that for evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing."

i posted a long one in the gun debate thread, it included societal downfall info. that also applies to this topic (it actually applies to all of humanity during this step in evolution and wonderful moment of society not only being about individual groups anymore but as a species as a whole now imho), especially the part about "Modern social critics commonly interpret things like sedentary social behavior". to me this equals people in hover chairs (wall-e, funny movie). truth being the new hate speech, societal downfall, opinions over truth and understanding, the quote in the political meme thread from dali lama ( brought to you by an auspicious poster - CFC, post #758 ) and not making sure the system is continuing to be successfully working equates to people not exercising their power and right to make things happen.

it's a lil out there and i'm not healed enough to use my faculties like i use to yet but i also don't think it requires that much effort and time, especially when there are 350 million people here. a lil bit from each person and a lot of problems could be taken care of in very lil time and with very lil work. of course i'm of the mind that problems have easy answers but not always easy solutions so what do i know.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I actually think "fake news" is an apt saying, I just think that certain people trying to convince the people to stop listening automatically to anything unless it comes from approved sources to be a horrible and frightening development. It's one step away from state-controlled, state-mandated media outlets as happens in authoritarian regimes. And given that the administration repealed media antitrust laws and the news conglomerate we're being told to exclusively trust is buying up large percentages of local news outlets... it looks bad.
 
Yeah I actually think "fake news" is an apt saying, I just think that certain people trying to convince the people to stop listening automatically to anything unless it comes from approved sources to be a horrible and frightening development. It's one step away from state-controlled, state-mandated media outlets as happens in authoritarian regimes. And given that the administration repealed media antitrust laws and the news conglomerate we're being told to exclusively trust is buying up large percentages of local news outlets... it looks bad.

All the major media reported on the hezbollah coverup
 
I'm sick of hearing about obama in the trump thread. You don't have to support obama if you hate trump. I hate trump, and while I must confess that I do think obama was a much better president based on what we've seen thus far. I didn't have particularly high regard for the obama administration either.

The obama administration has kinda been on my shit list ever since the crap they pulled with one of the early NDAA's. The one that resulted in a lawsuit over illegal detention.
 
Trump tweets
3000 people did not die in the two hurricanes that hit Puerto Rico. When I left the Island, AFTER the storm had hit, they had anywhere from 6 to 18 deaths. As time went by it did not go up by much. Then, a long time later, they started to report really large numbers, like 3000...

In High School I was embarrassed as fuck when my classmates couldn't read for shit. But this is far more embarrassing and coming from none other than the current president of the United States. Third grade mentality at most. Any takers?
 
TheLoveBandit said:
The hatred also puzzles me a bit. I don't feel threatened by him, so I'm trying to understand what drives such an emotional reaction among so many folks. Particularly for the fact that when emotion takes over, reason recedes, in any situation. And this is really what I find interesting...the seething hatred is unlike anything I've seen before, but when peeled back for reason..??

time to get back to you on the other two valid points you bring up. ^ this one first (sorry it's taken me so long. good stuff you bring up).

i don't feel threatened by him at all. if i was in the same room with him i would ignore him. if he engaged with me and wasn't being sociable or polite i would then belittle him in a sociably acceptable manner in order to let him know, "back off! your ruining my good time". if he was in the capacity of president and did this well all i can do is not say anything at all and respond directly to him with manners as i respect the office itself. the person in the office i can respect or not depending on who they are and choices they make. he is the president of the united states of america and whether i agree with it and like it or not he is still the president. here at BL i'm exercising my first amendment in accordance with the BLUA's of this fine site. (there is a purpose other than for venting and opinionating reasons)

what i think, feel and understand about trump and the office is, it's not a good mix imho. the power the office brings is much like a gun. something goes wrong you can't blame the presidency itself, only the person in the chair. what kind of damage he can do (aside from nuclear missiles) is great and reaches far not only in this country but in other ones as well. so i don't have a fear of him but i fear for those who will be harmed by his careless actions and how long it would take to repair the damage. tits something no one in the world can afford at this time. (plus i'm allergic to arrogance among a few other things. something i continually work on to better myself.)


TheLoveBandit said:
Since the thread is about Trump's Presidency, you raise some good points. African American support has been growing. This is something I don't see liberals addressing - either as a fabrication (does that mean it is an irrefutable fact?), or to explain the 'why' behind it.

i'm neither liberal, conservative, republican or democrat. i think for myself and sometimes my ideas line up with one of the two sets. though i find too much is invested in playing party i have seen the efficacy of it in the past and hope it will be something that is utilized as it was intended again. every politician will do what is necessary to gain favor with a demographic. it's why and what they do with it that counts. aside from my personal opinion on trump i think we also need time to see what he does with such support though i think there are some people here that could come up with some good ideas on what your curious about.


i guess there was 3 points you brought up and i can't seem to find the last one. i would rather not put words into your mouth so how about i just say in the last few days JGrimez and i had an exchange of ideas on why trump is or is not a racist. i brought up a few points that contest trumps effectiveness as president.

to me i think it is a good idea to not only involve facts from his presidency but also from his personal business before taking the office as it speaks to his professional manner. i also brought up some points on his personal life as well as ethical or moral center. i think that all 3 should be discussed as they are important to understanding the man behind the orange peel, err i mean squirrels tail, ex porn star... in the oval office. some people are going to post opinions, some random articles or points but i think i know where your headed and i agree. i just think there is more to be considered than just his time in the white house when talking of matters to determine if he is a good president.

like how his wife's parents just became citizens (insert joke here). i know it was by "chain immigration" and i'm sure trump himself had nothing to do with it considering (insert in laws joke here) but his haircut looks extra special because of it and he is enjoying other perks that he will come to regret in the long run. (his wife cuts his hair btw)
 
Last edited:
I'm going to hop in late and give a fresh perspective, as a Canadian watching from the sidelines.

Trump, distilled, is a giant middle finger to the establishment. That honour could have easily gone to Bernie Sanders had he taken the Democratic nomination. That mistake from Dems, combined with Russian meddling, combined with a wholesale disillusionment with government, created the perfect storm for Trump to get elected.

A leader needs to be someone I admire, and unfortunately the used car salesman archetype does not impress me. The effeminate flailing arms, the overuse of the superlative, the word salad, the absence of nuance in thought, the name-calling, the 'Animal Farm' style of manipulation, appeals to nationalism.. I really don't get the appeal. At all. I find him neither creative nor conscientious, thoughtful or quick-witted. His personality is, to sum up, a non-starter.

When it comes to policy, it's actually nice that he's not terribly socially conservative, and this should be evident by the fact that he has not led a socially conservative lifestyle. How this flies with his fundamentalist supporters is confusing to me.

When it comes to economic policy, I feel like he's completely out of his depth.

When it comes to foreign affairs, I feel like he's completely out of his depth.

So to sum up, the two things I like about Trump (socially liberal and anti-establishment) are really concessions that should trouble his supporters, and everything else is just awful.

So I don't really get it.
 
When it comes to policy, it's actually nice that he's not terribly socially conservative, and this should be evident by the fact that he has not led a socially conservative lifestyle. How this flies with his fundamentalist supporters is confusing to me.

Sometime I've found astounding, that I feel like pretty much nobody seems to have picked up on. Is that for better or worse, Trump might well be the first atheist president. He pretends not to be for obvious reasons. But it seems blindingly obvious to me that Trump is an atheist. And I find it amazing that the hardcore christians don't see it more readily.

While I have no problem with Trump being an atheist or with having an atheist president. I think one of the reasons is that Trumps personality is incompatible with belief in the existance of a being more powerful, intelligent and important in himself. And I do have a problem with that.
 
^ what you talking bout willis?

trump loves the almighty dollar.

the exact opposite of christians. (though if money is the root of all evil then why do they ask for it every sunday?!)

and your right, not many people notice this, strange isn't it.

@Cyc: that makes two of us. and they said no one who isn't american would be insightful. who they is i have no idea but i'm sure they are watching us as we type.
 
^ that's a good one. better than spelling potato with an "e", i'm sure mister Qualye would agree.

his In Quotes at the bottom were pretty funny, especially the one about the country going to hell.
 
I'm going to hop in late and give a fresh perspective, as a Canadian watching from the sidelines.

Trump, distilled, is a giant middle finger to the establishment. That honour could have easily gone to Bernie Sanders had he taken the Democratic nomination. That mistake from Dems, combined with Russian meddling, combined with a wholesale disillusionment with government, created the perfect storm for Trump to get elected.

A leader needs to be someone I admire, and unfortunately the used car salesman archetype does not impress me. The effeminate flailing arms, the overuse of the superlative, the word salad, the absence of nuance in thought, the name-calling, the 'Animal Farm' style of manipulation, appeals to nationalism.. I really don't get the appeal. At all. I find him neither creative nor conscientious, thoughtful or quick-witted. His personality is, to sum up, a non-starter.

When it comes to policy, it's actually nice that he's not terribly socially conservative, and this should be evident by the fact that he has not led a socially conservative lifestyle. How this flies with his fundamentalist supporters is confusing to me.

When it comes to economic policy, I feel like he's completely out of his depth.

When it comes to foreign affairs, I feel like he's completely out of his depth.

So to sum up, the two things I like about Trump (socially liberal and anti-establishment) are really concessions that should trouble his supporters, and everything else is just awful.

So I don't really get it.

Sanders would have never won.
 
Sometime I've found astounding, that I feel like pretty much nobody seems to have picked up on. Is that for better or worse, Trump might well be the first atheist president. He pretends not to be for obvious reasons. But it seems blindingly obvious to me that Trump is an atheist. And I find it amazing that the hardcore christians don't see it more readily.

While I have no problem with Trump being an atheist or with having an atheist president. I think one of the reasons is that Trumps personality is incompatible with belief in the existance of a being more powerful, intelligent and important in himself. And I do have a problem with that.

Indeed, if there's one thing I find consistent among Trump supporters, it's a complete inability to describe what exactly they like about the guy. Vague, hand-wavy gestures toward him being strong (Could you imagine him trying to throw a baseball or football, even in his prime?) and a sort of blithe confidence. Then there's the fact that he's a self-styled tremendous negotiator.. but stories abound of him ripping people off and records show him constantly being embroiled in lawsuits. Discussion about Trump's actual strengths tend to quickly be deflected to 'what abouts' or a flat out pivot to ridiculing the left, instead of any sort of direct, positive praise. When praise does come, it's in the form of ridiculous metrics like the stock market, or jobs created, as if the president is somehow directly involved in those things.

There has to be something we're all missing here. The guy strikes me as an overcompensating beta male who was picked last in gym class, with none of the charm of being smart and nerdy. It's baffling. He misses every checkbox.

Captain.Heroin said:
Sanders would have never won.

If you say so. I don't see why he would have done worse than Hillary and she got the majority of America's votes. I found Hillary to be a bland, unremarkable candidate.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trump tweets


In High School I was embarrassed as fuck when my classmates couldn't read for shit. But this is far more embarrassing and coming from none other than the current president of the United States. Third grade mentality at most. Any takers?

I facepalmed so hard when I heard this. What the actual fuck? Denying that Puerto Rico wasn't absolutely devastated by the hurricane? I think he's trying to deny that he has utterly failed to provide support to a US territory in the face of a terrible disaster.

(though if money is the root of all evil then why do they ask for it every sunday?!)

Well, totally an aside to the point of this thread, but in theory (and often in practice), churches ask for money so that they can use it to provide help for their communities, since we live in a world where money is necessary for pretty much everything. I attended a church that my ex was the pianist for (I was in the choir) which did a lot of good for their community. They raised tens of thousands of dollars a year and put it to good use.
 
I facepalmed so hard when I heard this. What the actual fuck? Denying that Puerto Rico wasn't absolutely devastated by the hurricane? I think he's trying to deny that he has utterly failed to provide support to a US territory in the face of a terrible disaster.



Well, totally an aside to the point of this thread, but in theory (and often in practice), churches ask for money so that they can use it to provide help for their communities, since we live in a world where money is necessary for pretty much everything. I attended a church that my ex was the pianist for (I was in the choir) which did a lot of good for their community. They raised tens of thousands of dollars a year and put it to good use.

That's a fair point, there are many Christian groups that do a lot of good in the community.

That said, it'd be a lot easier if they had Jesus around and could have him just pull infinite amounts of anything out of thin air like in the feeling of the multitudes. However I have it on the good authority of his representatives that he's due any day now so they just gotta hold down the fort till then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top