This is a topic I've been thinking about a lot for some time now.
Before AL-LAD and LSZ were released to the general public rc lysergamides weren't though to be realistic.
AL-LAD became very popular and the first batch ran out relatively quickly. LSZ on the other hand never became nearly as popular. It is still at least decent (especially because it was mainly aimed at the UK rc scene which didn't have a large selection of excellent psychedelics) but also quite bland and caused bad body load at higher doses in many people. Despite the huge potecy on paper it was quite weak irl. The first batch was still around when the second batch of AL-LAD appeared almost a year later (in the summer afaik).
Both were banned in the UK by January next year along with some that weren't even available.
AL-LAD continued to be sold elsewhere and more was made regularly. LSZ was sold while it was available but once it ran out it was not made again. Probability due to the low popularity and relatively hard synthesis.
As these two moved out of the UK a third UK legal lysergamide appeared. 1p-lsd. The effects are extremely close to lsd, the blotters were dosed quite accurately, the price wasn't too high and it was mostly legal. It soon became the most popular lysergamide.
After that ald-52, eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad were released. All 3 were excellent. 1a, 1p and lsd were almost identical but many people prefered one of them (ald-52 for me). Eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad were extremely good too. Both in sensory effects and mental depth. Imo they were just as deep as 1a/1p/lsd but the headspace was different. Sensory effects are very stronger than with r1 subs too. They were the most potent lysergamides yet and also had a steep dose response curve. Unfortunately eth-lad/1p-eth-lad produce extremely unpleasant body load in some people. So they never were as popular as the r1 subs. The synthesis was the hardest too with some batches failing with no obvious reason. This meant that they weren't that popular the producers. 1p-eth-lad and eth-lad were basically the same, 1p-eth-lad was made for the UK market because eth-lad was banned before it became available.
The vendor that was the first to make rc lysergamides available to the general public privately tested many more. I can say more than this.
Around the same time another vendor started making ald-52 and 1p-lsd.
So far so good right.
Sadly the first vendor decided to phase out r6 subs and ald-52. This didn't happen overnight but eventually al-lad started to become more and more rare. It was followed by eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad (this one stopped being made quickly after it's introduction and was never made in large amounts). All 3 r6 subs are at the time of writing still available but not as common as they used to be. Despite saying that ald-52 wouldn't be made any more another batch was made recently.
The other vendor never seriously considered making any r6 subs and isn't around anymore.
The first vendor recently released 1b-lsd which is another r1 sub. I haven't tried it but according to most reports it is either very similar to other r1 subs or slightly worse. Potency is a bit lower to. It is aimed at people living in countries where 1a/1p are illegal and at lysergamide fans who want to try as many as they can. Others are imo better off with 1a/1p.
They have released MIPLA too, but since it is an isomer of lsd they are planning to switch to 1p-mipla which should be very similar and better from a legal standpoint. I've not tried this one either but might try 1p-mipla (mipla is illegal here and the effects don't seem worth the minimal risk). According to reports this one is pretty mild and weak.
What I don't understand is why would they focus on 1p and not 1a subs. Obviously I'm biased but I prefer 1a. Are 1p versions much cheaper to make? Do they sell much better? I know about a vendor selling ald-52 and 1p-lsd and 1p-lsd sold much better. After I suggested they use either 1a and 1p lsd or ald-52 and pld-52 (they went with 1a 1p)sales became very similar.
However my biggest complaint is the abandonment of r6 subs which are imo the most magical. The reasons I've heard are either that r6 subs have bad yields or that making them requires working with controlled substances which requires a lab with the proper licenses (and I imagine such labs aren't very thrilled to work in the rc busines).
Could a possible workaround be to make r6 subs of mipla/ecypla /lsb/lsp/..?
Would anyone else love to see many more r6 subs become available?
Before AL-LAD and LSZ were released to the general public rc lysergamides weren't though to be realistic.
AL-LAD became very popular and the first batch ran out relatively quickly. LSZ on the other hand never became nearly as popular. It is still at least decent (especially because it was mainly aimed at the UK rc scene which didn't have a large selection of excellent psychedelics) but also quite bland and caused bad body load at higher doses in many people. Despite the huge potecy on paper it was quite weak irl. The first batch was still around when the second batch of AL-LAD appeared almost a year later (in the summer afaik).
Both were banned in the UK by January next year along with some that weren't even available.
AL-LAD continued to be sold elsewhere and more was made regularly. LSZ was sold while it was available but once it ran out it was not made again. Probability due to the low popularity and relatively hard synthesis.
As these two moved out of the UK a third UK legal lysergamide appeared. 1p-lsd. The effects are extremely close to lsd, the blotters were dosed quite accurately, the price wasn't too high and it was mostly legal. It soon became the most popular lysergamide.
After that ald-52, eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad were released. All 3 were excellent. 1a, 1p and lsd were almost identical but many people prefered one of them (ald-52 for me). Eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad were extremely good too. Both in sensory effects and mental depth. Imo they were just as deep as 1a/1p/lsd but the headspace was different. Sensory effects are very stronger than with r1 subs too. They were the most potent lysergamides yet and also had a steep dose response curve. Unfortunately eth-lad/1p-eth-lad produce extremely unpleasant body load in some people. So they never were as popular as the r1 subs. The synthesis was the hardest too with some batches failing with no obvious reason. This meant that they weren't that popular the producers. 1p-eth-lad and eth-lad were basically the same, 1p-eth-lad was made for the UK market because eth-lad was banned before it became available.
The vendor that was the first to make rc lysergamides available to the general public privately tested many more. I can say more than this.
Around the same time another vendor started making ald-52 and 1p-lsd.
So far so good right.
Sadly the first vendor decided to phase out r6 subs and ald-52. This didn't happen overnight but eventually al-lad started to become more and more rare. It was followed by eth-lad and 1p-eth-lad (this one stopped being made quickly after it's introduction and was never made in large amounts). All 3 r6 subs are at the time of writing still available but not as common as they used to be. Despite saying that ald-52 wouldn't be made any more another batch was made recently.
The other vendor never seriously considered making any r6 subs and isn't around anymore.
The first vendor recently released 1b-lsd which is another r1 sub. I haven't tried it but according to most reports it is either very similar to other r1 subs or slightly worse. Potency is a bit lower to. It is aimed at people living in countries where 1a/1p are illegal and at lysergamide fans who want to try as many as they can. Others are imo better off with 1a/1p.
They have released MIPLA too, but since it is an isomer of lsd they are planning to switch to 1p-mipla which should be very similar and better from a legal standpoint. I've not tried this one either but might try 1p-mipla (mipla is illegal here and the effects don't seem worth the minimal risk). According to reports this one is pretty mild and weak.
What I don't understand is why would they focus on 1p and not 1a subs. Obviously I'm biased but I prefer 1a. Are 1p versions much cheaper to make? Do they sell much better? I know about a vendor selling ald-52 and 1p-lsd and 1p-lsd sold much better. After I suggested they use either 1a and 1p lsd or ald-52 and pld-52 (they went with 1a 1p)sales became very similar.
However my biggest complaint is the abandonment of r6 subs which are imo the most magical. The reasons I've heard are either that r6 subs have bad yields or that making them requires working with controlled substances which requires a lab with the proper licenses (and I imagine such labs aren't very thrilled to work in the rc busines).
Could a possible workaround be to make r6 subs of mipla/ecypla /lsb/lsp/..?
Would anyone else love to see many more r6 subs become available?
