• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Many 'Recovery Houses' Won't Let Residents Use Medicine To Quit Opioids

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
84,998
Cristina Rivell has been struggling with an opioid addiction since she was a teenager ? going in and out of rehab for five years. The most recent time, her doctor prescribed her a low dose of buprenorphine (often known by its brand name, Suboxone), a drug that helps curb cravings for stronger opioids and prevents the symptoms of withdrawal.

As the devastating effects of the opioid crisis continue, a growing body of research supports the efficacy and safety of this sort of medication-assisted treatment (also called MAT) for drug recovery, when combined with psychotherapy. But the use of any of these medicines ? a list that includes methadone and naltrexone, as well as Suboxone ? remains frowned upon by most operators of sober living houses.

These "recovery houses," sometimes also referred to as sober living homes, sober homes or sobriety houses, are commercially run residences where small groups of people who are battling addiction live and eat together, go together to meetings of Narcotics Anonymous or Alcoholics Anonymous and support each other as they go to therapy.

Though such homes are only loosely regulated and have come under scrutiny in some states for cases of mismanagment, some of these facilities have also saved lines, survivors of addiction say.

But operators of the facilities often demand "cold turkey" sobriety, and that's a problem say specialists in addiction treatment.

Rivell says Suboxone helped stabilize her ? it made her feel like she could get her life together, go back to school and look for a job without the distraction of constantly seeking a fix.

"People think, like, you feel something ? or you're high," she says. "But when I take it, I just feel normal. I don't have my cravings."

Rivell believes that when she relapsed in the past, it was because she was trying to stay sober without emotional support.

"When you're by yourself, you kind of feel lonely," she explains, and that makes it easier to kid yourself into thinking you can skip Suboxone for one day and use heroin instead without long-term consequences.

Rivell figured if she combined her daily dose of Suboxone with a supportive living environment, she'd have a better chance of staying sober.

With her stay in a medically supervised rehab facility coming to a close, Rivell started calling around to see which sobriety house might have room for her, as a next step in her recovery. But it wasn't looking good.

"I would say, like, 'I'm Cristina. I'm on Suboxone; I'm just looking for an open bed,' " she says. "And they're like, 'We don't take people on Suboxone.' And they'd just hang up on me."

Rivell's experience is not unique. And as many doctors and government agencies now consider these medical treatments part of the standard of care for opioid addiction, some are concerned that recovery houses with rigid rules prohibiting them are pushing more users into homelessness.

After Rivell called around for a few days, she began to worry that would be her fate. Her mother told her she couldn't come home. Rivell says her therapist suggested she try going off Suboxone ? to have an easier time finding housing.

But she feared she would relapse again, and she didn't want to go through forced withdrawal.

"I was scared because I thought I was going to go back through the cravings and be sick again," she says.

After a few more days of calls, Rivell found an unlikely ally in Barbara Williamson.

Williamson opened her first recovery house in Southeastern Pennsylvania in 2014, when she was just 25 and had been sober only a year herself. Initially, Williamson didn't allow people using Suboxone or methadone to live in her houses ? the medicines seemed like a crutch, she says.

"I tried heroin when I was 15 years old," says Williamson, who quickly progressed to using the drug every day. She spent time homeless and on the street after that, and credits the recovery house she ultimately found with saving her life.

"I was 98 pounds and willing to do anything for the next fix," she remembers. With the support she got in the sobriety house, Williamson was able to quit heroin cold-turkey, back then; she figured others could, too.

Then, one day last November, Williamson was struck by a Facebook post she saw online from a community activist named Brooke Feldman.

"If you refuse to house residents who utilize maintenance medications or do not provide this option in your treatment programs because of personal opinion ? or you believe this will 'jeopardize the recovery of people not using medication,' your misinformed blindness is part of the problem," Feldman said in her post.

The critique stung. Williamson had always seen her recovery houses as a strong part of the solution to the opioid crisis. So she set out to do some research ? hoping to prove Feldman wrong.

She took some training courses and talked to a lot of doctors. And the more she learned, she says, the more she realized that the evidence points in the other direction.

Ultimately, Williamson says, it was the number of overdose deaths among young people that pushed her to try something new. She'd had a number of residents of her recovery homes die soon after they move out.

"What do I have to do to not have morgues calling parents of 18-, 19-, 20-year-old kids?" she says. "I will do anything. So if the doctors and the facts are saying that [medication-assisted treatment] helps, then I will do my part to facilitate that need."

Williamson opened her first house five months ago, just outside of Philadelphia, for residents who rely on medication-assisted treatment to wean themselves from opioid addiction.

She's since opened three more in the area ? so now owns three for men and one for women. To make things easier, she decided to create housing exclusively for those on MAT, rather than integrate these clients into her other housing.

She was worried that people on MAT would feel pressure to get off problematic opioids too quickly if they were around people who were not using maintenance medication. And if people who weren't on MAT were in a house where Suboxone was being stored, even securely, she worried about the potential for its misuse.

Partly because of these sorts of liability concerns, allowing people on MAT to live in recovery housing is still unpopular with owners of the homes. Fred Way, of the Pennsylvania Association for Recovery Residences, estimates that of the 200 houses he certifies statewide, only about seven admit people taking Suboxone or similar medications.

Philosophical differences also play a role, he says. A lot of recovery house operators are closely aligned with 12-step programs, which often count methadone or buprenorphine ? technically opioids ? as a violation of their abstinence-only rules.

They see someone on MAT as "still using," Way says.

Nationally, less than half of all "residential facilities" allow people to be on opioid maintenance medications. (That number includes hospitals and other licensed institutional living facilities. But it excludes many recovery houses, which don't have licensing requirements and so aren't required to report to an oversight body.)

Still, researchers of addiction treatment say the evidence shows MAT reduces the risk of opioid overdose. Dr. Nora Volkow, who heads the National Institute on Drug Abuse, says that if society more often considered addiction a disease, keeping people off treatment would seem crazy.

"I don't see any other condition or disease," she says, "where you basically ask the person to forego the medication treatment," as a condition for getting help.

Williamson's new recovery houses aren't the only signs that the tide is starting to change. Earlier this year, Philadelphia began requiring that the 18 recovery houses the city funds accept people who are on medically assisted treatment for their opioid addiction.

The National Association of Recovery Residences is also working on a policy guide to educate recovery houses on how to best offer treatment.

Soon after Williamson opened her first sober house, she wrote a message to Brooke Feldman, the woman who got her thinking about all of this in the first place.

"I introduced myself," Williamson remembers, and adds with a wry smile, "I explained how I hated her guts and [that] she'd consumed me."

"She was really clear that she was upset with me," Feldman says, and laughs. "But that recovery had taught her to take a look at herself. And what started out as an attempt to sort of prove me wrong, ended up being an enlightening experience for her."

Williamson thanked Feldman for opening her mind and allowing her to help more people. The two say they plan to soon meet in person for the first time ? Feldman wants to develop a training program in the use of medically assisted treatment, specifically geared toward recovery house operators. And Williamson wants to help.


Source: http://www.wbur.org/npr/644685850/m...nt-let-residents-use-medicine-to-quit-opioids
 
I have been going through this same problem for the last few years. Let's take the town of Colorado Springs. I was only able to find one sober home in that city that actually worked with clients on Suboxone. I decided not to go due to the fact that the sober home at the time was literally a dad who opened up a sober home for his own son who was on MAT. So the home housed this guy and his girlfriend. I called them six months later to find they had closed.

I have had some better luck with Oxford Houses allowing those on Suboxone. I had to sit and get interviewed by this guy who had tried to kill his girlfriend and found his way to being the president at this Oxford house. Listening to a convicted killer ask me if the 4 mg of suboxone I took got me high was somewhat amusing. Sober homes should be ashamed of themselves for turning away clients who are stabilized on Suboxone and are actively attending groups. A lot of the suboxone clients are actively engaging in evidenced based treatments compared to a subset who only attend twelve step based meetings. The overdose rate and relapse rate is far higher in the second group.

We have gotten to the point of realizing that a majority of these other medications used in addiction treatment can cause a physical dependency. They do not have to containe an opioid to cause concerning side effects and physical WD's once discontinued. If they do not allow Suboxone then they should not allow SSRI's, beta blockers or gabapentiniods.
 
Last edited:
Sober homes just as big a crock of shit as AA/NA. I treatment center I went to was trying to strong arm me into going into one. I flatly refused telling them I was over 40, owned my own home, had professional employment and that college was over 20 years in the past and there was no way I was going to live in basically a dorm with an overbearing houseparent. They discharged me over that and then had the gall to notate "against medical advice." If this means anything to anyone reading this, ORT saves lives. Period. Do not listen to the haters. If you think ORT is appropriate for you, you don't need to spend bucketloads of money on treatment, just a good doctor and a psychologist (and get one that has a real PhD from a credible institution and not someone with a masters in addictions counseling from some school that has late night infomercials) to help sort out your mental health issues.
 
AA/NA philosophy of "all drug use is a disaster" didn't work for me. It had the effect if I slipped it turned into a binge because you have to go in and get shamed and get your chip so fuck it keep going. I was somewhat brainwashed by the "AA or jails, institutions, death" (which means all but 5% of people who walk in there end up in jail or dead, according to them. Shit track record.)

Since I cleared my head of all their bullshit my drug use is under much better control. I smoke weed and take kratom (as a substitute for suboxone or methadone which I find have more of the negatives of other opiates.) Occasionally trip that's about it. I very rarely (like every couple months) pull all nighters getting high etc. I have been pretty much steadily employed since quitting AA, much higher self esteem in generally (I don't feel like going into a room every night bored to tears and telling everyone what an asshole I am) and am back in school.
 
They'd have to change their names to "Withdrawal Hell Squat", there's no such thing especially IV use without some 'done or subutex/suboxone/the thousand brrands bupe comes in + some comfort meds to add to that. Taking 'done without an antihistamine that's a sedative also is pointless, doctors script Morphine, Codeine, Demerol, etc. with Hydroxyzine often because it can cut the dose of the opiate in half, especially with Demerol and Talwin...those allergic to morphine often get those completely synthetic painkillers.
 
I'm dealing with this now. It's bullshit.
 
AA/NA philosophy of "all drug use is a disaster" didn't work for me. It had the effect if I slipped it turned into a binge because you have to go in and get shamed and get your chip so fuck it keep going. I was somewhat brainwashed by the "AA or jails, institutions, death" (which means all but 5% of people who walk in there end up in jail or dead, according to them. Shit track record.)

Since I cleared my head of all their bullshit my drug use is under much better control. I smoke weed and take kratom (as a substitute for suboxone or methadone which I find have more of the negatives of other opiates.) Occasionally trip that's about it. I very rarely (like every couple months) pull all nighters getting high etc. I have been pretty much steadily employed since quitting AA, much higher self esteem in generally (I don't feel like going into a room every night bored to tears and telling everyone what an asshole I am) and am back in school.

I hated AA for this. It got boring telling everyone how much of a fuck up I am and was when using alcohol etc...Then there was the whole not getting selected to talk when you wanted to or just listening to someone who had 10 years clean time saying it is all because of the program yet doesn't realise they have put in the effort and that's why it got this far.

Unfortunately my psychologist seems to encourage me every week to go to an AA meeting cause of my desire to still want to use. In essence she is right, I need to do more about it but I just can't be fucked caving in to AA and making myself feel depressed after every meeting that I am a fuck up.

I have 118 days clean time now with only one relapse that lasted a day and I have done this all without AA, so may as well continue this way.

The other problem about AA / NA is you are forced to communicate with some oddball characters.

Then there is the other case of having a sponsor, I remember when I had one he was calling me up at positive times of my day telling me how crap the world is. It would always leave me with having a shit day.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, the oddballs... seems a lot of sex offenders, sketchy not actually sober folk, people dealing out the back etc
 
Top