Vastness
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2006
- Messages
- 2,318
Would anyone more knowledgeable than I about pharmacology care to speculate on the likely short and long term health impacts of using diarylethylamines?
I know there is precious little to no actual research (I have looked, but if you know of anything relevant please do mention it anyway) hence why I'm asking for speculation.
I am most interested in Ephenidine since that's the one I've used, and probably is the only one I'm going to use, but given the relative novelty of the entire class speculation about any of them is welcome. I understand that diphenidine has been involved in a few deaths but I am a little hazy as to the specifics of these fatalities and the exact biological mechanism by which they occurred. Really, any information or speculation at all is welcome.
The first time I used Ephenidine I felt like I'd taken some industrial chemical and like I could actually feel my body struggling to process it. Retrospectively, I think this is highly likely to be more to do with the power of suggestion and my preconceived suspicions about the Chinese lab from which it likely originated. That said, I was drawn to Ephenidine after reluctantly having to quit using Ketamine after a couple of bladder scares as well as lingering negative psychological aftereffects that I could no longer pretend were not happening, and my impression so far is that apart from the inconvenient duration, it does not share the dreaded bladder-toxicity of arylcyclohexylamines, and the psychological aftereffects are a little easier, especially given the longer duration.
Of course, I recognise that reduced psychological and immediately obvious physiological aftereffects are not by any means a reliable measure of the severity of any real, neurological or physiological changes, BUT I mention this only really because arylcyclohexylamines are my only frame of reference. If there is a more structurally congruent class of chemicals that it would make more sense to compare with then please do share also.
I know there is precious little to no actual research (I have looked, but if you know of anything relevant please do mention it anyway) hence why I'm asking for speculation.
I am most interested in Ephenidine since that's the one I've used, and probably is the only one I'm going to use, but given the relative novelty of the entire class speculation about any of them is welcome. I understand that diphenidine has been involved in a few deaths but I am a little hazy as to the specifics of these fatalities and the exact biological mechanism by which they occurred. Really, any information or speculation at all is welcome.
The first time I used Ephenidine I felt like I'd taken some industrial chemical and like I could actually feel my body struggling to process it. Retrospectively, I think this is highly likely to be more to do with the power of suggestion and my preconceived suspicions about the Chinese lab from which it likely originated. That said, I was drawn to Ephenidine after reluctantly having to quit using Ketamine after a couple of bladder scares as well as lingering negative psychological aftereffects that I could no longer pretend were not happening, and my impression so far is that apart from the inconvenient duration, it does not share the dreaded bladder-toxicity of arylcyclohexylamines, and the psychological aftereffects are a little easier, especially given the longer duration.
Of course, I recognise that reduced psychological and immediately obvious physiological aftereffects are not by any means a reliable measure of the severity of any real, neurological or physiological changes, BUT I mention this only really because arylcyclohexylamines are my only frame of reference. If there is a more structurally congruent class of chemicals that it would make more sense to compare with then please do share also.