• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Opioids no better than NSAIDs for chronic back or arthritis pain

avcpl

Bluelighter
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
1,147
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...-chronic-back-or-arthritis-pain-idUSKCN1GI2T2

(Reuters Health) - Acetaminophen, ibuprofen and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are better than opioids at easing the intensity of chronic pain in the back, knees or hips, a U.S. experiment suggests.

And opioids are no better than these other drugs at reducing how much pain interferes with daily activities like walking, working, sleeping or enjoying life, researchers report in JAMA, online March 6.

?We already knew opioids were more dangerous than other treatment options, because they put people at risk for accidental death and addiction,? said lead study author Dr. Erin Krebs of the Minneapolis VA Health Care System and the University of Minnesota.

?This study shows that extra risk doesn?t come with any extra benefit,? Krebs said by email.

U.S. deaths from opioids including heroin and prescription drugs like oxycodone, hydrocodone and methadone have more than quadrupled since 1999, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. Today, more than six in 10 drug overdose deaths involve opioids.

Amid this worsening opioid crisis, the CDC has urged physicians to use opioids only as a last resort. Instead, doctors should talk to patients about the potential for exercise or physical therapy to help ease symptoms and prescribe other, less addictive drugs for pain including acetaminophen (Tylenol) and NSAIDS such as aspirin, ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin) and naproxen (Aleve).

NSAIDs carry their own risks, especially at high doses, including the potential for internal bleeding, kidney damage and heart attacks. But they aren?t addictive.

For the current study, researchers randomly assigned 240 patients seeking pain treatment at VA primary care clinics to receive either opioids or alternative medicines like acetaminophen or ibuprofen for one year.

Participants were 58 years old on average and most were men. Back pain was their most common complaint, affecting 156 patients, or 65 percent, and the rest had either hip or knee osteoarthritis pain.

People in the opioid group started therapy with fast-acting morphine, a combination of hydrocodone and acetaminophen, or immediate release oxycodone. If that wasn?t successful, patients next got long-acting morphine or oxycodone, and then doctors tried fentanyl patches.

In the non-opioid group, patients first got acetaminophen and NSAIDs. If those options didn?t help enough, doctors tried options like the nerve pain drug gabapentin (Neurontin) and topical painkillers like lidocaine, followed by the nerve pain drug pregabalin (Lyrica) and tramadol, an opiate painkiller.

Researchers asked participants to rate how much pain interfered with their lives at the start of the study, and again 12 months later.

By this measure, both groups improved equally over the course of the year, based on a 10-point scale with higher scores indicating worse impairment.

With opioids, scores declined from an average of 5.4 at the start of the study to 3.4 a year later. With other drugs, scores dropped from 5.5 to 3.3.

Patients also rated pain intensity on a 10-point scale with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms, and non-opioid drugs worked slightly better on this measure.

In both groups, patients initially rated their pain intensity at 5.4, but scores dropped to just 4.0 with opioids and fell to 3.5 on the other drugs.

One limitation of the study is that people knew which medications they were prescribed, which might affect how patients reported their own pain severity and daily functioning, the authors note.

Even so, the results offer fresh evidence that opioids may not be worth the addiction risk when treating chronic pain, said Marissa Seamans, a researcher at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore who wasn?t involved in the study.

?There is increasing evidence that non-opioid pain relievers are just as (if not more) effective than opioids for chronic non-cancer pain,? Seamans said by email.

Patients should only consider opioids if alternatives like exercise, physical therapy or other medications don?t help, said Dr. Chad Brummett, a researcher at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor and co-director of the Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network.

?Prior to beginning opioids, patients not responsive to these non-opioid medications should ideally be evaluated by a pain specialist before starting chronic opioid therapy,? Brummett said by email.
 
As a pain management patient this truly frightens me. I think they're looking for any excuse to stop prescribing and this will give them what they need.

never mind that the opioids ALLOW me to be able to exercise and live an active life. fuck.
 
After removing otc codeine products in Australia recently, because studies show they are in effective, apparently in many cases... it feels like a world wide movement to reduce opiod drugs being prescribed but without the true reason being revealed.

Odd indeed and unfortunate for those in pain needing these drugs
 
This stuff is frustrating. They do have a lot of issues with how they’ve prescribed opioids over the last ten or twenty years here, but frankly everything has been fucked up in terms of how opioids are prescribed (or not) ever since the 1920’s.

Anyone who knows much about pain management understands how misrepresentative this article is. It’s absolutely true that 800mg IBU is more effective if an analgesic for SOME KINDS of pain than 5mg hydrocone/any amount of APAP, but that doesn’t mean much.

Patients either seem to be prescribed opioids wholly inappropriately (such as during the 90’s/00’s) or not enough (such as where we are going now). Drug policy makes everything a matter of extremes, it’s really sad and disgusting.
 
i'm sure this article (or other articles making the exact same claim!) has been published multiple times in the last few years, and it's been posted here at least once.
see if i can find them...
 
As a chronic pain patient the entire direction of this crisis is pretty scary. Nobody can tell me Ibuprofin works as well as Hydromorphone. I call bullshit on that right now.

Attacking prescription medications hasn't done shit to prevent overdoses in the US. In fact it was announced they had increased by 59%, 109% in some States. People are dieing from Heroin and Fentanyl. Crossing the southern border and mailed thru the US postal system. Start there. Fix that.

Also, provide options that are better than shitty outpatient programs designed to make profits for the States. Everyone knows A lot of people start out by trying prescription pills. But Dr's in general have been cutting back writing opiate scripts since 2014. At least here in Michigan.

Now, Dr's are petrified to prescribe Tylenol 3. Point being, the crackdown on scripts is effecting the wrong People, and doing absolutely nothing for those that are suffering and dieing.
 
What a BS article. While 800mgs of ibuprofen works better for a tooth ache than say small amount codeine or hydrocodone for me it is not better than opiates for real nasty pain.

F*cking politicians need to stay the f*ck out of these medical issues. It really pisses me off.

Thanks God nature has provided some alternatives. Or the black market. Morons, I hate the term "opiate crises" because the wanting to fix that causes the problems. Let doctors prescribe and maintain their patients without politics coming in.

Sorry, this article pissed me off.
 
I didn't see any glaring flaws in the study discussed in this article. However, there are some points that are being glossed over in the media reports:

(i) It is unfair to pitch this as comparing opioids directly to NSAIDs for pain treatment. Over half of the non-opioid treatment group were also prescribed either a gabapentinoid such as gabapentin (Neurontin) or a tricyclic antidepressant such as amitriptyline, and over half were prescribed a topical anaesthetic.

(ii) They saw no evidence of iatrogenic addiction, nor were there any accidental deaths in the opioid group:

Krebs et al. said:
There were no significant differences in adverse outcomes or potential misuse measures. Two hospitalization or ED visit events were determined analgesic-related: 1 hospitalization in the nonopioid group and 1 ED visit in the opioid group. No deaths, “doctor-shopping,” diversion, or opioid use disorder diagnoses were detected.

The study doesn't comment on the implications of this latter point, however.
 
Last edited:
Does anyone have a copy of the full text? Apparently it's not available through JAMA without payment or subscription. Sorry if I missed it somewhere.

http://www.agencymeddirectors.wa.go...areConference2017/KrebsImprovingtreatment.pdf
In this review ^ by the same researcher tramadol is listed as a "non-opioid therapy" on page 14. And I see in the OP that tramadol is listed in the "non-opioid" group, yet it says it's an "opiate pain killer"; I'm a bit confused as to how tramadol is being classified and included in this study. Did participants who were prescribed tramadol get switched to the "opioid" group?

Thank you SJP for pointing out that other drugs were used than nsaids; I'm curious to know the full list of non opioid medications used in this study.

As someone living with diagnosed chronic pain, having been a pain patient on opioids and no longer am due to doctors decision/refusal to continue, I am tired of being told to exercise, eat healthy, use non medication treatments etc, because I already do those things daily. As someone touched on above, having a bit of a narcotic allows me to do my exercises. In the 4 years since my pain began I've lost 90lbs through change in diet, quit smoking tobacco, done physical therapy for 2 years, work out regularly, do yoga regularly, and it still hurts. I don't understand removing a tool from the toolbox so to speak. Narcotics should not be the end-all answer, but they should be part of a treatment plan if it aids in daily functioning imo.
this is disgusting to me. especially the news headlines such as "the jury is in" from NBC or "Finally proof" from Vox
 
Last edited:
Awful shit study.

The mass implication is that opioids are ineffective analgesics.

They're very effective for extreme and moderate pain, and always effective for acute pain.

Sure, maybe chronic mild pain patients, i.e. arthritis and mild back/joint pain don't need opiates, but the way the media's broadcasting this story makes it seem like opioids have no advantages over NSAIDS. NSAIDS increase heart attack risk, and over-consumption harms the liver.

More reactionary anti-opiate activists are trying to lie and dupe us out of decent medicine.
 
As a pain management patient this truly frightens me. I think they're looking for any excuse to stop prescribing and this will give them what they need.

never mind that the opioids ALLOW me to be able to exercise and live an active life. fuck.
"patients not responsive to these non-opioid medications should ideally be evaluated by a pain specialist before starting chronic opioid therapy" It seems like even this study points out that if a Pain Dude inspects you and deems you Certifiably Inpain that no one should protest. Right?

Sure, maybe chronic mild pain patients, i.e. arthritis and mild back/joint pain don't need opiates
No one needs opiates imho. It's just that a lot of those people will no longer be able to work, go out to eat, take vacations and in fact won't really even be able to leave the house much. Some may need to stay in bed all day. But they don't need opiates as long as someone gives them money and does their housework.
 
No one needs opiates imho.

There's religious people who would argue no one needs medicine of any kind, they just need to be a believer, and to pray. :|

Sorry, poor argument.

We're moving forward in time, and medicine is coming with us.
 
As long as they keep heroin flowing into the US we are ok. I would've honestly killed myself at point after my back surgery if it wasn't for heroin.

It's took months to find a doctor to presribe me opioids even though I had just had back surgery and was bedridden for almost a year. Heroin dealers really came through though
 
ibuprofen causes renal failure

so for a chronic condition its completely unsuitable
 
In this review ^ by the same researcher tramadol is listed as a "non-opioid therapy" on page 14. And I see in the OP that tramadol is listed in the "non-opioid" group, yet it says it's an "opiate pain killer"; I'm a bit confused as to how tramadol is being classified and included in this study. Did participants who were prescribed tramadol get switched to the "opioid" group?

Thank you SJP for pointing out that other drugs were used than nsaids; I'm curious to know the full list of non opioid medications used in this study.

Krebs et al. said:
Opioid Prescribing Strategy

Per protocol, patients in the opioid group started taking immediate-release (IR) opioids. Step 1 was morphine IR, hydrocodone/acetaminophen, and oxycodone IR. Step 2 was morphine sustained-action (SA) and oxycodone SA. Step 3 was transdermal fentanyl. Single-opioid therapy was preferred, but dual therapy with a scheduled SA opioid and as-needed IR opioid was considered based on patient needs and preferences. Opioids were titrated to a maximum daily dosage of 100 morphine-equivalent (ME) mg. If dosages were titrated to 60MEmg/d without a response, rotation to another opioid was considered before dosage escalation.

Nonopioid Prescribing Strategy

In the nonopioid medication group, step 1 was acetaminophen (paracetamol) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Step 2 included adjuvant oral medications (ie, nortriptyline, amitriptyline, gabapentin) and topical analgesics (ie, capsaicin, lidocaine). Step 3 included drugs requiring prior authorization from the VA clinic (ie, pregabalin, duloxetine) and tramadol. Patients were initially prescribed a step 1 medication, unless all were clinically inappropriate. Subsequent changes included titrating, replacing, or adding medications.

In the non-opioid group, over half of the patients were at some point prescribed an "adjuvant" as described above and over half were at some point prescribed a topical anaelgesic. Few patients were prescribed tramadol, although the precise frequency is not given, and there is no info at all on the frequency of prescription of pregabalin or duloxetine.
 
"patients not responsive to these non-opioid medications should ideally be evaluated by a pain specialist before starting chronic opioid therapy" It seems like even this study points out that if a Pain Dude inspects you and deems you Certifiably Inpain that no one should protest. Right?

No one needs opiates imho. It's just that a lot of those people will no longer be able to work, go out to eat, take vacations and in fact won't really even be able to leave the house much. Some may need to stay in bed all day. But they don't need opiates as long as someone gives them money and does their housework.

I agree with the second paragraph, tried deleting the first but my phone deletes too fast and the quote info ends up long gone.
I think we ARE moving forward and in doing so we will let go of this obsession with opioids. They serve a purpose but not nearly to the extent they've been used.

They were seriously so easy to get for such trivial types of pain. It convinced me that the mindset was this: they're in pain that nsaids won't fully alleviate so let's add a high to their pain so they're at least in a good mood.

I'm not talking about palliative, end of life treatment. I'm not talking about serious neurological pain or pain resulting from big time injuries. But as a country we have definitely over prescribed these shits for a long time and, as drug community, we tend to get pretty defensive when faced with this reality.

Edit: also, to be clear I do think this article misrepresents opioids in a big way. They do serve a purpose for a lot of people. The real problem lies with how unnecessarily large that "lot of people" is. And it's only that large because we've decided to make it that large.
Most of what my comment is in regards to is a acute pain. I apologize, Topamax has destroyed my memory and I couldn't think of the word but didn't wanna give up on the comment so I went ahead anyway.
I don't think most people who've gotten opioids for acute pain have really needed them. Keyword being most.
 
Last edited:
I know there's bigger fish to fry than the tramadol; I just don't understand how that can be included in the non-opioid group and then be labeled an opiate pain killer in the same text.

I hope that, as a whole, our medical system doesn't run with this single study and use it to justify furthering the already inadequate and inhumane treatment practices in place. Every study should be replicated and altered before it influences patient care imo.

not that this is a valid argument, but I hypothesize that further reduction in medical, controlled prescribing will lead to an increase in black market and adulterated products, likely not improving the "opioid epidemic" in any way; perhaps setting the stage for further damage to be done and more lives lost.
 
This stuff is frustrating. They do have a lot of issues with how they’ve prescribed opioids over the last ten or twenty years here, but frankly everything has been fucked up in terms of how opioids are prescribed (or not) ever since the 1920’s.

Anyone who knows much about pain management understands how misrepresentative this article is. It’s absolutely true that 800mg IBU is more effective if an analgesic for SOME KINDS of pain than 5mg hydrocone/any amount of APAP, but that doesn’t mean much.

Patients either seem to be prescribed opioids wholly inappropriately (such as during the 90’s/00’s) or not enough (such as where we are going now). Drug policy makes everything a matter of extremes, it’s really sad and disgusting.

That's always how humans work. They can't ever get it right. They always wind up going to an extreme. Can't ever just be sensible and moderate.

It's the same with everything.
 
There's religious people who would argue no one needs medicine of any kind, they just need to be a believer, and to pray. :|

Sorry, poor argument.

We're moving forward in time, and medicine is coming with us.
hmm
I agree with the second paragraph, tried deleting the first but my phone deletes too fast and the quote info ends up long gone.
I think we ARE moving forward and in doing so we will let go of this obsession with opioids. They serve a purpose but not nearly to the extent they've been used.

They were seriously so easy to get for such trivial types of pain. It convinced me that the mindset was this: they're in pain that nsaids won't fully alleviate so let's add a high to their pain so they're at least in a good mood.

I'm not talking about palliative, end of life treatment. I'm not talking about serious neurological pain or pain resulting from big time injuries. But as a country we have definitely over prescribed these shits for a long time and, as drug community, we tend to get pretty defensive when faced with this reality.

Edit: also, to be clear I do think this article misrepresents opioids in a big way. They do serve a purpose for a lot of people. The real problem lies with how unnecessarily large that "lot of people" is. And it's only that large because we've decided to make it that large.
Most of what my comment is in regards to is a acute pain. I apologize, Topamax has destroyed my memory and I couldn't think of the word but didn't wanna give up on the comment so I went ahead anyway.
I don't think most people who've gotten opioids for acute pain have really needed them. Keyword being most.
I'm not sure CH and MRyder noticed I was being sarcastic on second paragraph.
 
This seems like more propagandist bollocks and opioid-hatred from a bunch of politically-vested, selfish and generally idiots with sand up their cunt flaps. I am well aware of the difference between NSAIDs, parashitamol, and opioids. Although now I can only use NSAIDs topically, rather than orally, because of GI issues, I have taken a fair bloody menu sheet of NSAIDs in the past. So I am more than qualified to speak of their efficacy in me. As for APAP, then I've even been forced, yes FORCED to accept INTRAVENOUS infusion of paracetamol in an ER unit after BADLY hurting my leg, so badly that it had swollen to the point where the skin was beginning to split, in so much, such intense pain that eventually they did 'relent' and give me 10mg oral morphine, then another 10. DESPITE knowing that I am not only opioid tolerant, but physically dependent, as a long term chronic pain patient with a legitimate set of scripts.

And despite the fact that I had told them that paracetamol does not affect me. It can reduce a fever, but it will not have any impact on even the mildest pain. I've currently to deal with a nasty foot injury too, that had gotten infected. Intensely painful, and I am absolutely certain that paracetamol would have done nothing whatsoever. And there is no question of even attempting to use the topical NSAID gels on a wound of this nature. Thankfully the doctor who has been making home visits in his own time after hours when needed, been giving me an additional increase in my morphine script, and also oxy IR to the tune of equivalence to a bit under a half gram of morphine a day.

Doesn't know that I've been shooting it. But its the difference between night and day. Minutes after depressing the plunger and administering an intramuscular injection then the pain just goes. Fades away to the point where I can at least rest it as it heals, sprawled out on the sofa with a cushion under my ankle. I've swallowed APAP tablets as OTC paramol (+7.5mg or so each of DHC) and they do nothing. I'd die of liver failure long before I even approached a little pain relief for just a couple of hours, if it were not for doing an extraction on several boxes at a time)

So, there really isn't even the option of using non-opioids IMO for acute, severe pain. And as for chronic pain, I've trochanteric bursitis, bilaterally, I've a fucked up knee with tendinitis, caused by a penetrating wound directly into the joint as a child, from falling onto an upraised glass spike which was driven into my knee joint, straight through my patellar tendon. And in recovery, being attacked and, after having my kneecap and head stamped on viciously and left for dead by a pack of chavscum. Nerve damage after failed knee surgery, and the only option is, if, day to day without additional injury, for me to strike the faustian pact and get on longterm opioids.

If it wasn't for the morphine and oxy, I'd have such pain even lying down, in my hips and knee that sleep would be impossible, even with my taking chlormethiazole as a seizure prophylactic and for actively shutting them down, even with nitrazepam thrown in on top. Its either opiates, and no need to take nitrazepam save occasionally on days where shit hits fan, for some reason. Or just occasional needing a sleep aid. Don't need it because of the pain though, and the amount of pain I am usually in, even 100mg doses of nitrazepam plus my daily chlormethiazole treatment, prevents sleep without the pain meds.

Other, nonopioid drugs just simply cannot step in and fill that void. I'd know, I've tried, well not quite every single option, but most of them, there are a few things, like lidocaine patches, that can't be prescribed on the NHS, for example, but otherwise, I've gone through the gamut of analgesics. Opioids, strong ones and heavy doses are the only thing that has worked.
 
Top