Study Volume for Muscle Hypertrophy and Health Outcomes

Genetic Freak

Moderator: SIED
Staff member
Joined
Mar 18, 2012
Messages
2,759
An interesting paper released recently

Some key points:

  • Low-volume resistance training has recently gained attention among many individuals, trainers, and researchers as a means of achieving or promoting time-efficient training.
  • The literature has convincingly shown that the volume of resistance training has a dose-response effect on muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes, and that the doses causing a ceiling effect or even detrimental effects are currently unknown.
  • Increasing training volume may be the most easily modifiable variable causing beneficial adaptations in an exercise program.


Volume for Muscle Hypertrophy and Health Outcomes: The Most Effective Variable in Resistance Training
Vandre´ Casagrande Figueiredo1,4 • Belmiro Freitas de Salles2 • Gabriel S. Trajano3

Abstract Resistance training is the most effective method to increase muscle mass. It has also been shown to promote many health benefits. Although it is deemed safe and of clinical relevance for treating and preventing a vast number of diseases, a time-efficient and minimal dose of exercise has been the focus of a great number of research studies. Similarly, an inverted U-shaped relationship between training dose/volume and physiological response has been hypothesized to exist. However, the majority of available evidence supports a clear dose-response relationship between resistance training volume and physiological responses, such as muscle hypertrophy and health outcomes.
Additionally, there is a paucity of data to support the inverted U-shaped response.
Although it may indeed exist, it appears to be much more plastic than previously thought. The overarching principle argued herein is that volume is the most easily modifiable variable that has the most evidenced-based response with important repercussions, be these muscle hypertrophy or health-related outcomes.

http://sci-hub.bz/10.1007/s40279-017-0793-0
 
I'd assume the limit is even more malleable for us enhanced individuals?
 
I feel like most emphasis on low volume is done to try and sell programs where people don't have to try as hard.

"You can get ripped on two 45 minute sessions per week!"
 
I can't view all of it, not sure if it's because I'm not on my phone.

I'd be interested to see what the range of volume looked like in their studies and the RPE. CNS recovery, or lackthereof, has been my number one problem over the years when it comes to progress. I cannot physically train with as much volume as I enjoy (unless it's very low intensity/weight) and still have my CNS recovery so it's been tricky to find some medium and still never feel like I quite hit it, also likely due to the fact that I enjoy more volume.
 
Have you ever experimented with full body training, swim? I know I virtue signal a bit about it and I don't want this to sound that way. But my CNS fatigue went down simultaneously with my strength going up after I converted. And DOMS also goes away. Granted I am starting to think a split might be better for building mass and may actually try a split again next cycle.
 

just a heads-up: sci-hub has been having trouble recently; I have to try a new
domain every couple weeks it seems. The above link goes nowhere.

Here it is on pubmed:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29022275

... and while getting that one, I bumped into:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433992
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jun;35(11):1073-1082. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
snip
"The findings indicate a graded dose-response relationship whereby increases in RT volume produce greater gains in muscle hypertrophy."

 
just a heads-up: sci-hub has been having trouble recently; I have to try a new
domain every couple weeks it seems. The above link goes nowhere.

Here it is on pubmed:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29022275

... and while getting that one, I bumped into:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27433992
J Sports Sci. 2017 Jun;35(11):1073-1082. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1210197. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
Dose-response relationship between weekly resistance training volume and increases in muscle mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
snip
"The findings indicate a graded dose-response relationship whereby increases in RT volume produce greater gains in muscle hypertrophy."



Try these:

sci-hub.la
sci-hub.hk
sci-hub.tv
sci-hub.tw
sci-hub.name
sci-hub.mn
 
Top