Salutations,
Hence still interested i gather?... M'well, by the way, have you ever noticed how each new title actually adds more "statement" to our (aHummm...) "front page"? So to speak?... Anyway, lets keep focussed for a minute, even if this aspect alone could have sustained more of my attention in itself - but the thing is, i really got to proceed with my intended menu!
8)
The "plugging marijuana" consumption method (as you chose to call it) happens to belong to at least 2 overlapping and yet very opposite realities.
Simply attempt to imagine a battlefield with Cheech & Chong as the pro-cannabic leaders, standing proudly on one side, with a duo of gogo-dancing escorts for each guy...
And of course never hesitate to fill the voids, etc...
Then comes what Kevin Sabet and so many more antipathic "Tough-Love"/"Fix-My-Kid" style of socio-toxic advocates got to chat about:
Euh... Anyone now finally getting my point?
Ah, and no doubt most of them are obcessively envious to see each of us "cured" by force, if ever given a chance that is...
...
Back to my main topic, in between there's that overlapping area which i previously mentioned.
So here's what's so "funny" that i managed to detect in your linked article, or more exactly what i actually failed to find:
It doesn't contain 1 single occurence of the "vap" character chain, as in "vapo", or "vaporizer".
Go figure. Still interresting?...
As a matter of fact don't even stop at the text, search for a strategy, an underlying intent (anti-banalisation/vilification IMO)... I mean its author vaguely enumerated consumption methods thinking of "but plugs" besides edibles spontaneously (...), as the only alternative to smoking since vaporization shown nowhere on that biased landscape, euh...
IMO this is the type of unpleasant reading i got no spare-time to waste over, not to mention its origin host brought back more unpleasant reflexions too, as i've once tried to join this specific board a long while ago, euh...
So all i care about is the fact that this particular subject seemed considered worthy enough of public attention though it still proved insufficient, somehow, in justifying true public education relatively to what a "vapo" is, what it does which smoking doesn't, whatever.
M'well, that sort of trivial things! Yano? Euh...
Now lets have my compact version: the most important information is that which was voluntarily dropped only to serve bigot humour, at least that's what i've retained from this most peculiar sample: "voluntarily generated noise", just as i happened to comment initially...
I was extremely opposed to the idea. Still am, actually.
Although i'm no prohibitionist i prefer to highlight all available alternatives, inclusively. For example:
Lets save the lost children of planet Itnoc (from socio-toxic devices shown at
left) using Weapons of Mass Seduction (illustrated at
right)!! %)
And i'm not even in the medical business or anything mercantile...
« There’s no reason a patient should be taking the risk of smoking when safer, more effective administration methods are readily available... »
M'yeah, you don't say!...
...no hard feelings, Egzoset.
In conclusion sometimes what you see is NOT what you get. To each his own (readings) indeed and yet please try being more critical of your own sources...
Most of us we all fall for it at least once, it's a game in some mirror house and they've been at it before many readers were even born: practice makes perfect.
You are absolved. Do no sin again! ...
Good day, have fun!!