Psychedalienation
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2016
- Messages
- 391
Still costs money. Still could save money by using the illegal drug trade to their advantage and saving us tax dollars.
What about the farmers that legally grow them now? Should they lose their livelihood? There is enough legally grown poppies for the pharmaceutical industry already. Your plan solves no problem but creates them for people who are doing the right thing.Still costs money. Still could save money by using the illegal drug trade to their advantage and saving us tax dollars.
The poppy is used to synthesize many pharmaceuticals?
No they are no, not the poppies that are being burnt. They are only used to produce heroin.
The farmers are paid barely anything and the cartels get all the money. The same cartels that rape and murder kidnap torture behead and dismember men women and children.
When I used first used heroin I was a 16 year old kid. Kids are irresponsible so not sure what your getting at about the mountain thing, there's not a mountain on every street corner.
The point of your post was to say they should use the poppies to produce pharms? Why do they need to do that? Is there a shortage of pharms?
So to be clear you are in favour of putting the innocent farmers that grow the legal poppies for the pharmaceutical industry out of a job just so the pharmaceutical companies can reduce their costs and increase their profits. That is the only possible outcome of your plan. It makes zero sense.