I'm not citing anyone in particular, but what I
appear to be reading a lot of in this thread is (mostly men who've been circumcised) getting a bit defensive about their cocks, projecting their own insecurities and saying "I've been circumcised, I'm fine, all girls tell me its great, it's clean, and sex is amazing," and using this to justify genital mutilation for minors who have
no choice or understanding of the matter.
I've already mentioned that there are potentially serious consequences for
some children and adult men who are circumcised (on top of the more immediate failures that occur during the procedure). Thus if you don't
need to perform the operation, it is not logical to submit yourself or your child to the risk, no matter how small. That should be patently obvious, especially to any caring parent who's thinking more about their child than their own ego.
Over in Europe, Asia, South America, Southern Africa and Oceania (ie
most of planet Earth) the majority of men are not circumcised. They are not rushing out to randomly chop their or their children's naturally-evolved foreskins off for no medical reason whatsoever. Most women are not asking for men with circumcised penises, and meanwhile the foreskin enhances a women's clitoral stimulation during sex.
Infant male circumcision is genital mutilation
Men should have the right to choose circumcision, not have the choice forced upon them. Infant circumcision without consent or immediate medical justification is an unjustified violation of basic human rights, that shares more in common with ancient coming-of-age rituals than responsible medical practice
https://www.theguardian.com/science/the-lay-scientist/2011/dec/06/1