N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand
My question is, is the very last plate from the article a misprint? It says "N.D." is 'not determined', and "N.A." is no activity, but one of the "N.A."s (the important one, the beta arrestin recruitment ratio) is called "not determined", now, that would be some witty juggling in a paper that is trying to somehow insinuate a drug has no affect on arrestin when it does by omitting testing for it, but from what the article claims, it should say no activity.
"Yeah let's occasionally say no detectable activity with the reason being that we just didn't even measure it. Preferably when the subtitle compound is concerned."
- no one ever, let's hope.
My mother always told me I should be a proof-reader for a newspaper.