I agree with you, hence why I said drugs can be both safe and unsafe. I justy hate when people do a drug vs. drug compariosn e.g. Marijuana v MDMA, Alcohol v MDMA etc. All these drugs CAN be dangerous if used improperly. I also believe the whole LTC thing can be anxiety related for some people but for me it certainly is not
I agree with the first part of your statement, though I do think certain aspects of different drugs can be compared to be able to vaguely form a safety profile, it's not because different drugs have different side-effects that one can't make a (somewhat subjective) comparison of the potential damage done.
I don't know if I agree with the second part. Reason for this is that I think you have no way of knowing that, except for when you've actually sought professional help and they diagnosed a physical cause. It is incredible the physical consequences something psychological can have. Again I am not taking sides for or against the anxiety theory, I'm just pointing out that you really shouldn't discredit it unless you have solid proof that the root cause is physical. I again point out that there are people on here that first thought they suffered from brain damage, only to come to the conclusion they had created a self-reinforcing loop of anxiety months and months later. They might do some research on this in the PTSD trials that could shed some light on this, who knows. Until someone researches it, it's only speculation and from what I've seen is that there possibly is a physical root cause, but it is not something permanent and it is possible even that it is purely psychological. Purely my opinion here, based on bluelight, experience and reading heaps of research
Agree I was hasty deluded is not fair, but it is a pretty deluded thought to think mdma is safer than booze, this is a harm reduction fourm and I'm sharing safe facts.
Obv both can be dangerous used improperly but mdma is much less forgiving fo sure
I do not agree with that and you are also not stating facts but stating an opinion. If I drink heavily once every three months, I get a nasty hangover that lasts for two days. If I take MDMA (tested & pure) in a high dose once every three months, I get a pleasant afterglow. Same for everyone I know in real life. So the recreational after-effects appear to be less severe. The real problems for both substances of course appear when abusing them. And even there it is clear to me alcohol has a much greater impact. MDMA abuse, apart from what I read on this forum, has caused no long-term effects, not in me, nor in anyone I know. I've done some pretty hardcore abuse for a pretty long time, others I know even worse, and we all came out fine. We had some fucked up side-effects for a while, but were ok after at most a month or two.
On the other hand I know people, even have one friend like that, that have been abusing alcohol for a few years now and they are seriously spiralling downhill both mentally and physically. Don't forget that this forum is the first place people with problems concerning MDMA will seek out, so naturally one will get a distorted image of how it is in reality. I'm not saying MDMA is harmless, it isn't, but I think the recreational safety margin is much greater with MDMA and I also think even when abused (more so when abused) MDMA doesn't cause the carnage alcohol does