StoneHappyMonday
Bluelighter
- Joined
- May 10, 2001
- Messages
- 18,084
Fucking hell Raas. Get some reading lessons. And some understanding outside of this good/wicked God bollocks. You're regressing man.
Erm, being an opiate addict is nothing like being a child molester. Did I even read that right? are you really comparing the two?
Proper justice is something society could benefit from imo
Fucking hell Raas. Get some reading lessons. And some understanding outside of this good/wicked God bollocks. You're regressing man.
You didn't read it right - some people think about opiate addicts (or christians or muslims or athiests) the same way that most people think about paedophiles. Btw how does the 'love your enemy' bit fit with 'no sympathy'?
No I did read it right.
If someone hates on a peado, they have valid reason (It's likely that person is quite ill-intended, deliberately careles). If someone hates on an opi addict, they do not have that same valid reason. So it is misplaced.
I understand your point, but I feel we all have an awareness of what is right in our heart and what we should never do.
"hell and heaven" is on earth
but I feel we all have an awareness of what is right in our heart and what we should never do.
Less economical drain, zero chance of re-offending, if a dog bites somebody it gets put down... if a monster fucks somebodys life up they banged up for a few years then released with a new identity or some shit... eye for an eye. or operate. or do something
I think very much the same.. however as a father myself I think id soon turn hypocrite if somebody were to harm my daughter... its a difficult one indeed
Books and literature come under free speech Shammy. I don't go with the argument that books and video games and films make people rape/kill etc.
But if someone wants to hang a paedophile it's as wrong as them wanting to hang an opiate addict in my opinion - and your answer on love your enemy? Is the paedophile not your enemy - why are you not loving them? (which is not to say not putting them in jail or whatever)
That simply is not true. Certain personality orders, brain injuries and mental illnesses specifically involve not being able to tell right from wrong. Obviously it's not only people in those situations that commit crime but they are still people and some do commit crime without being able to understand they are doing wrong - would you class those separately and treat them differently or should they also be locked up until their lonely death? If that sounds at all sarcy it really isn't I'm just wondering as you didn't mention situations like that and they wouldn't fit with your idea of universal moral awareness.
Morals and ideas of what is right and wrong also vary quite dramatically over time too. Are we at the pinnacle of moral awareness or is it likely we still have a lot to learn and improve on? I strongly suspect the latter so don't really go in for statements of absolute moralaties like those. If a thing used to be considered perfectly acceptable but would know be utterly abhorrent to us would that person know in their heart they were doing right if born years ago and know it was wrong if born now?
Of course not... How can a drug user even be compared to a peado?.... Fuck societys fucked up backwards media properganda brainwashed views, absolute horseshit