Pythagoras
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2009
- Messages
- 625
^^^
The History of science is littered with the contra-normative science, some of it by those driven insane by too much 'pseudouniverse' and 'cosmic censorship': both terms are Penrose's. I think his naive partnership with Hammerhof has not helped his cause. A Theory it is, of that there can be no doubt.
If ever there was a mind that could give answers to Quantam weirdness and a theory of consciousness, two of the most important gaps in Scientia, then Penrose fits the bill nicely. A polymath with an empirical fondness, he has cast light on cosmology, entropy, the Big Bang and has proferred solutions to relativity, space-time and geometry. To my mind he proposes an interesting hypothesis as to why a space filled with energy alone remains a bubbling soup of quantum froth until an observer settles it back to Newtonian matter. Leave out Hammerhoffer, and the piqued egos of consciousness Academe who naturally cannot think outside of their narrow specialisations, and admit a physicist to their higher ranks.The Hypothesis requires paradigm shifts in several subjects whose friction against radical change is understandable
Penrose is a remarkable mind, able to tread on convention, holistic in its outlook, and uninterested any more in accolades - I feel his constantly evolving Hypothesis holds great promise. It is often the counterinstinctive that holds true and I think Penrose's marriage of consciousness and elementary particle physics will one day be lauded throughout the academic world..
PS - I think his rigourous empiricism was the cause for his hasty alignment with Hammerof. The latter could be wrong, whilst Penrose's Hypothesis is no more outlandish than M-Theory or tachyon light switches.
MENS AGITAT MOLEM
The History of science is littered with the contra-normative science, some of it by those driven insane by too much 'pseudouniverse' and 'cosmic censorship': both terms are Penrose's. I think his naive partnership with Hammerhof has not helped his cause. A Theory it is, of that there can be no doubt.
If ever there was a mind that could give answers to Quantam weirdness and a theory of consciousness, two of the most important gaps in Scientia, then Penrose fits the bill nicely. A polymath with an empirical fondness, he has cast light on cosmology, entropy, the Big Bang and has proferred solutions to relativity, space-time and geometry. To my mind he proposes an interesting hypothesis as to why a space filled with energy alone remains a bubbling soup of quantum froth until an observer settles it back to Newtonian matter. Leave out Hammerhoffer, and the piqued egos of consciousness Academe who naturally cannot think outside of their narrow specialisations, and admit a physicist to their higher ranks.The Hypothesis requires paradigm shifts in several subjects whose friction against radical change is understandable
Penrose is a remarkable mind, able to tread on convention, holistic in its outlook, and uninterested any more in accolades - I feel his constantly evolving Hypothesis holds great promise. It is often the counterinstinctive that holds true and I think Penrose's marriage of consciousness and elementary particle physics will one day be lauded throughout the academic world..
PS - I think his rigourous empiricism was the cause for his hasty alignment with Hammerof. The latter could be wrong, whilst Penrose's Hypothesis is no more outlandish than M-Theory or tachyon light switches.
MENS AGITAT MOLEM
