And "statistics" are a set of tools, not a discipline (I guess it can be a major though, which just seems odd to me).
"Statistics" is now pretty much synonymous with "applied mathematics." I understand the inconsistancy of how the word is being used, though. C'est la vie...
Kyk said:
I mean, are we talking in terms of how difficult it is to pass? How well paying the jobs are after graduation? How smart the students are?
I don't think people who excel at math-related courses are necessarily better academics. There are people who know 10 different languages but can't solve a quadratic equation. Does that make them 'shit'?
Difficulty to pass, as opposed to how smart the average student in the discipline is. Clearly your foreign language example demonstrates this -- the programs in FL tend to only want one to learn 2 or so. I think dilligence can lead one to 2, but you gotta have a gift upstairs to learn 10. Likewise, a computer programmer can learn enough languages required to graduate a lot easier than s/he could learn 5x as many. Similar arguments for other fields...
--
Okay, so I think the creator of the meme, whether it was the OP or was found on the net by the OP, is basically trying to say which majors are "harder" than others. Now this is pretty much impossible, given the amount of variables that need to be considered. But when people try to do this, more often then not, the argument is something like this:
To find the most difficult majors, look at the starting pay for the jobs in the prospective majors. Generally, the more money they make starting out, the harder the coursework, the less graduates, therefore the a higher demand.
I am not saying I necessarily agree with this argument (in fact I see blatent flaws), but I'm putting it out there as something a bit more formalized than the 5 tiers. Thoughts? Either about where ya fall on such, or about the merit of such an argument...
Note that these charts tend to change based on who is doing the research. I just went fish.