yougene said:I think if using an ontology that differentiates nothingness from its finite content( e.g scalars ), everything is different in that it is a union of both. In that case, everything is a partial ordering of the nothing/something dichotomy.
God contains the intrinsic propertyof completion and as Godel has shown us, nothing complete can be consistently delineated. Yes it is God, as is everything else. God as completion exists within a phenomonological space where the delineation of wholes/parts is in flux. Where the act of delineating God and drawing relations, modifies said delineation. Maybe.Is this God?
i can conceive the concept of "nothing".
alasdair