• S E X
    L O V E +
    R E L A T I O N S H I P S


    ❤️ Welcome Guest! ❤️


    Posting Guidelines Bluelight Rules
  • SLR Moderators: axe battler | xtcgrrrl | arrall

Circumcision MEGA MERGED poll and discussion

How do you feel about circumcision?

  • I am male, intact and happy to be that way

    Votes: 170 35.7%
  • I am male, circumcised and glad to be that way

    Votes: 167 35.1%
  • I am male, intact and wish I were circumcised

    Votes: 22 4.6%
  • I am male, circumcised and I wish I were intact

    Votes: 33 6.9%
  • I am female and in favor of circumcision

    Votes: 44 9.2%
  • I am female and against circumcision

    Votes: 28 5.9%
  • Other - I'll post my response below

    Votes: 12 2.5%

  • Total voters
    476
uncut, and didnt even know the difference till i was like 19. never had a girl say anything about it till my most recent relationship, lol and not even till the last couple years out of 6... she loves it btw.

i'm glad i'm not cut, i consider it to be a form of mutilation. one shouldnt cut off parts of babies cocks.

i am american, but i was born on the army base in frankfurt germany, so that may have had something to do with my intact status.
 
Everyone here I'm sure knows my views on this topic; I am vehemently against routine infant circumcision. I approve of it only in adults, and in minors where absolutely medically necessary, and other less invasive treatments have failed.

I wish I was circumsised when I was born instead of getting it done when I was ten, I had developed some sort of rash/infection on my head and no its not cause I was dirty, I've always been a bit of a clean freak actually, and let me tell you that shit fuckin hurts real bad, getting stabbed doesn't hurt nearly as much as getting cut and my moms the type of crazy bitch that told the dr. that I wouldn't need those nasty pain killers post op, thanks mom I still have nightmares about that pain.
It sounds like you had a bad dr, and I'm sorry to hear about your experience. It's sad when physicians amputate tissue when other options (antibiotics, etc) are available. Of course, I don't know the specifics of your case, but circumcisions are mostly performed unnecessarily.

This is only an issue in America.
Not true, it's also an issue in muslim parts of the world (which are quite significant, obviously) and parts of Africa.

It is cosmetic more than anything. I got my son done, had to pay for it.
If it is a cosmetic procedure, which I agree it nearly always is, especially in infants, why did you do it to your son? Would you have amputated his outer ear if you thought it looked better?

Though I'm sure I would love being uncircumsized if I grew up like that but for the record I'm most likely gonna have my kid circumsized.

He may appreciate it when he's older.
He will appreciate it if you allow HIM to make the choice. If he doesn't like having a foreskin, he can always choose to have it removed as an adult, with far less pain and trauma than he would have experienced as an infant. It is immoral for you to make that choice for him, based on your own foreskin-ignorant state.
 
Strawberry_lovemuffin said:
I don't know about that. I'm in Australia too and it's certainly an issue in my household. Hubby is circumcised - like most Australian men aged 30 +, it was just what happened in the 70's. And these men are now poised to become dads might want their boys circumcised just because "they were" (which includes my partner).

It's good that boys your age aren't cut now as a rule. The less people who get their boys cicumcised, the less there will be who will grow into dads wanting to perpetuate the tradition. And the "norm" will become intact penises, allowing the whole thing to eventually die out entirely.

Well uh boys my age...I'm 22. I mean I don't have any research handy or anything but only one of my mates is circumcised.

As to the post about Muslim countries...I didn't know it was an issue there. Do you mean it's an issue in that there is debate but it's widely practiced or it's an issue as in this context?
 
Me and most of my mates are cut. I'm 27 and live in OZ.

From what many girls have told me, cut guys usually last longer in bed as they are less sensitive.

I would definitely chop off my sons rain coat. I've heard too many stories of men tearing their hood during sex. Thats gotta hurt! Get rid of the excess baggage I say.
 
uncut and proud. no need.

more sensitivity = less sexual stamina? not if you can breathe :)
 
I am cut, and kind of pissed me off. They sliced up my body before I even had a chance to weigh in. I like my body the way it is, I don't need it to be more asethetically appealing. Fuck circumcision. If I ever have a kid, no way is he getting circumcised. All natural all the way!
 
I will admit that circumcision is mostly done (at least in first world countries) for cosmetic purposes. However, I have noticed that the views of most board members seem to be malleable and at least open to change. Specifically, there have been studies conducted that have been reported in this board and in major newspapers (e.g. NYT, WSJ) that have suggested that the transmission of HPV and HIV may decrease when the male partners have been circumcised. Two caveats here: 1. these studies are not definitive and 2. there are other ways of preventing the spread of these diseases such as contraceptives and abstinence. However, if true it certainly proves that circumcision is useful and not simply cosmetic.

What I find funny is that although boardmembers have pointed out such studies in the past, fairnymph would never accept the fact that circumcision may be desirable for infants (except in the rare cases where it is medically necessary) no matter what science showed. She has proven time and again that no matter how open boardmembers are to the views of others, she most certainly is not.
 
Last edited:
Frankly, I don't give a damn, my dear. :)

I've been with cut and uncut guys, and there really isn't any difference. The only time I can imagine there ever would be is if a guy had some kind of freakishly long foreskin or something, and even then it would mostly be a problem for him, not me. I think cut pen0rs do look nicer when flaccid (most cocks look pretty much the same when erect), but that certainly isn't going to make or break anything for me. I don't spend a lot of time looking at my partner's dick anyhow - I'd prefer to have it in me, tyvm! :D

There was actually a fight over this when my brother was born. My mom didn't want to get him circumcized, but my dad absolutely would not have anything to do with that. He was going to have his baby boy cut and that was final! His reasoning was that he didn't want my brother to be made fun of in the locker room. Maybe it's just cuz I'm a girl and don't understand, but a) why are guys staring at each others dicks in the locker room, and b) why is that something to make fun of? Do they make fun of guys with attached vs. unattached earlobes? Meh, whatever, lol.
 
I've never seen an uncut penis of a grown person. I have of a little kid, and it looked like my classmate's boneless extra finger.

But I would like to observe one, before I die.
 
^to chopped chimp - Uhhh..

1. I last plenty long - too long in fact, I don't finish (ever, unrelated to uncut status, its mental). Stamina might have something to do with being circumsized but probably has a LOT more to do with experience and mental factors.

2. If you play with your dick regularly, ie, wash it in the shower, wank off every once in awhile, the skin grows elastic and is not tight. I can't imagine tearing my foreskin - I don't even think its possible. And I've had EXTREMELY rough sex before.. no irritation or threat of tearing whatsoever.


Sometimes I wonder if people without foreskin even know what the fuck it is.
 
Specifically, there have been studies conducted that have been reported in this board and in major newspapers (e.g. NYT) that have suggested that the transmission of HPV and HIV may decrease when the male partners have been circumcised. Two caveats here: 1. these studies are not definitive and 2. there are other ways of preventing the spread of these diseases such as contraceptives and abstinence. However, if true it certainly proves that circumcision is useful and not simply cosmetic.

You forget to note that these studies were done in Africa on people not having safe sex and probably having multiple partners in an EXTREMELY high infection rate part of the world. If you cant see how the circumstances effect the study outcome then I duno what to say.

Dtergent said:
I've never seen an uncut penis of a grown person. I have of a little kid, and it looked like my classmate's boneless extra finger.

But I would like to observe one, before I die.

You've probably seen them plenty in porn movies and didn't realize it. While erect a uncut dick looks pratically identical to a cut one. While flacid it looks, for lack of a better word, like a shnuflelupogus.
 
aanallein said:
You forget to note that these studies were done in Africa on people not having safe sex and probably having multiple partners in an EXTREMELY high infection rate part of the world. If you cant see how the circumstances effect the study outcome then I duno what to say.

I didn't "forget" to note anything. You fail to accurately respond to what I wrote.

If those studies are right then the fact that people could prevent STD transmission via other means does not negate the fact that circumcision has utility beyond merely cosmetics.

The only point you are making (whether you realize it or not) is that if those studies prove what they suggest then circumcision may be useful in places where HIV infection rates are extremely high and not in other places. However, that does not actually (read above) speak to what I wrote.
 
^ I wasn't being argumentative I'm just pointing out exactly what you just now said.

It is without doubt that circumcision has utility unrelated to cosmetics. That's the reason it was started as a practice in the first place (6000 years ago).

When people don't bathe often and are uncircumcised theres a build up of smegma and other shit under there and its unhealthy. It promotes disease and possibly cancers. 6000 years ago and indeed, til rather recently (and still continuing in large parts of the globe), people didn't wash hardly at all. In modern society where people bathe this problem doesn't exist, so the utility is removed.

Similarly, in areas of the world without proper sexual education, absense of protective measures like condoms, a high HIV infection rate, and promiscuity, removing the foreskin likely prevents transmition of HIV by some degree because there is lower surface area to transmit the disease. BUT, again, like the case with cleanliness, in modern society with proper sex education, high protection use, monogomy, wide screening/testing for HIV, and low infection rates, the protection circumcision offers is vastly reduced if not completley nil.

That's what I'm pointing out. Utility is not universal.

Ya I'd promote circumcision in 3rd world countries especially but also areas where poor hygeine and high STD infection rates and promiscuity are a problem, but elsewhere I see no utility aside from cosmetics. And choppin' one of the most sensitive parts of a baby's dick off for cosmetic reasons alone is hardly justified.
 
aanallein said:
^ I wasn't being argumentative I'm just pointing out exactly what you just now said.

It is without doubt that circumcision has utility unrelated to cosmetics. That's the reason it was started as a practice in the first place (6000 years ago).

When people don't bathe often and are uncircumcised theres a build up of smegma and other shit under there and its unhealthy. It promotes disease and possibly cancers. 6000 years ago and indeed, til rather recently (and still continuing in large parts of the globe), people didn't wash hardly at all. In modern society where people bathe this problem doesn't exist, so the utility is removed.

Similarly, in areas of the world without proper sexual education, absense of protective measures like condoms, a high HIV infection rate, and promiscuity, removing the foreskin likely prevents transmition of HIV by some degree because there is lower surface area to transmit the disease. BUT, again, like the case with cleanliness, in modern society with proper sex education, high protection use, monogomy, wide screening/testing for HIV, and low infection rates, the protection circumcision offers is vastly reduced if not completley nil.

That's what I'm pointing out. Utility is not universal.

Ya I'd promote circumcision in 3rd world countries especially but also areas where poor hygeine and high STD infection rates and promiscuity are a problem, but elsewhere I see no utility aside from cosmetics. And choppin' one of the most sensitive parts of a baby's dick off for cosmetic reasons alone is hardly justified.

No, the protection circumcision offers would still be the same, it is simply that people may be more prone to employing additional methods of protection in first world countries.
 
Last edited:
I am un cut cuz you let the nerve grow a little longer then the average guys wang I am 7.5 now age 26 when I was 19 I was 8inches
 
I have never been with a guy who was uncut and I think I would be grossed out if I was. I just dont like the look of it.

If I hadnt grown up only knowing circumsized penises then I would probably feel differently, but because I have done the opposite it just would creep me out based on what is familiar to me.
 
dreamgirlie19 said:
I have never been with a guy who was uncut and I think I would be grossed out if I was. I just dont like the look of it.

If I hadnt grown up only knowing circumsized penises then I would probably feel differently, but because I have done the opposite it just would creep me out based on what is familiar to me.


once the cock is hard it looks the same.


if men are uncut they are better lovers
 
smegma is not just a male issue, girls get it too.

the cure? take a shower. simple as that.
 
Top