• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

NEWS: The Age 27/5/03 - Police charged over heroin

Jokerswild

Bluelighter
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Messages
181
What You Gunna Do When They Come For You

Posted: Mon, 26 May 2003 23:39 AEST

ABC News

Police charged over drug offences
Three Victorian police officers and a former officer have been arrested and charged with drug offences.

Members of the Victoria Police Ceja Taskforce made the arrests today.

Detective Senior Constable Ian Ferguson, 34, of the Crime Department has been charged with four offences including drug trafficking.

Senior Constable Joanne Ferguson, 36, from country Victoria has been charged with conspiracy to traffic and conspiracy to money launder.

Detective Senior Constable Glenn Sadler, 37, from an inner Melbourne police station has been charged with six offences including drug trafficking.

And former Detective Sergeant Stephen Cox, 39, has also been charged with drug trafficking.

Police say the three men were all members of the former Victoria Police Drug Squad.

All four will appear in the Melbourne Magistrates Court tomorrow morning.


All I can say is HHHAAAAAA HAAAAAAA

JoKeR =D
 
By John Silvester, David Adams
May 27 2003

Three members of the Victoria Police and a former member were behind bars last night after being charged in relation to an alleged $1 million heroin trafficking syndicate.

The four - three men and a woman - were charged by investigators from the the Ceja Taskforce, which was set up by Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon to investigate corruption in the former drug squad.

The men were members of the former drug squad.

The policewoman is married to one of the charged former drug detectives.

Charged were:

  • Detective Senior Constable Ian Ferguson, 34, of the Crime Department, with trafficking a commercial quantity of heroin, conspiracy to traffic heroin, perverting the course of justice and conspiracy to money launder.
  • Senior Constable Joanne Ferguson, 36, from country Victoria, with conspiracy to traffic heroin and conspiracy to money launder.
  • Detective Senior Constable Glenn Sadler, 37, from an inner Melbourne station, with trafficking heroin, conspiracy to traffic heroin, conspiracy to money launder, perverting the course of justice, blackmail and bribery.
  • Former Detective Sergeant Stephen Cox, 39, with trafficking heroin and conspiracy to traffic heroin.

The four have been remanded to appear in the Melbourne Magistrates Court this morning.

The arrests follow an investigation by Ceja Taskforce, revealed in The Age earlier this month, into allegations that police trafficked large quantities of heroin during an epidemic of the drug in Melbourne around 1999.

It takes to seven the number of serving and former police charged in relation to allegations involving the drug squad, which was axed by Ms Nixon in 2001. But last night's charges are the first in relation to alleged heroin trafficking.

Last month, the state's most experienced drug squad detective, Wayne Geoffrey Strawhorn, appeared in court on three drug-related offences, three counts of threatening to kill and one count of theft.

Another suspended drug squad detective - Detective Sergeant Malcolm Rosenes - indicated to the County Court last month that he would plead guilty to trafficking a commercial quantity of ecstasy.

Rosenes was arrested in 2001, along with former Detective Senior Constable Stephen Paton, who was also a member of the drug squad. Paton is charged with drug trafficking. The charges relate to 550,000 Sudafed tablets.


This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/26/1053801345862.html
 
IMO these cops, like all cops, were put in a position of trust by the community and therefore they should recieve harsher penalties than any civilian convicted of the same crime.
 
im sick of the amount of hatred towards police on bluelight. if your not prepared for the consequences (ie. being involved with drugs and its possible repercussions) then collect stamps or something. sure its good that justice provails and any police involved in illegal activity deserves what they get, but generic widespread branding of all police like this totally immature and uncalled for. there are bad apples in every barrel, not all police are like this.

[edit:] the comments this post was aimed at were deleted in the thread merge. my point still stands tho.
 
Last edited:
NEWS: The Age 28 May 03: Police 'ran million-dollar heroin ring'

Police 'ran million-dollar heroin ring'
May 28 2003
By Selma Milovanovic



A husband and wife, both police officers, have been accused of squandering $819,000 of drug money over three years while part of a police heroin ring.

The Melbourne Magistrates Court heard that Detective Senior Constable Ian Ferguson, 34, and two other policemen allegedly sold $1.5 million worth of high-grade heroin to an alleged drug trafficker over more than three years.

His wife, Senior Constable Joanne Ferguson, 36, the mother of three children, was yesterday released on bail amid fears for her safety. If she had been held, she would have been the only policewoman in custody, and would have faced solitary confinement for 23 hours a day, the court heard.

Ferguson faces charges of conspiring to traffic heroin and conspiracy to money launder.

The court heard that Ian Ferguson and his two alleged co-offenders, Detective Senior Constable Glenn Sadler, 37, and former detective sergeant Stephen Cox, 39, became involved in a heroin and bribery ring in April 1999 while they worked in the former drug squad investigating heroin trafficking in the CBD.


The four were charged on Monday following an investigation by Ceja Taskforce, set up by Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon to stamp out corruption in the former drug squad.

The new arrests take to seven the number of serving and former police charged over allegations involving the drug squad, axed by Ms Nixon in 2001. Detective Senior Sergeant John Roger told the court Ceja investigations continue, but could not say whether more arrests related to this case would follow.

Prosecutor Julian Leckie, SC, said that the three policemen began their association with an alleged heroin trafficker when he was granted bail in May 1999 after agreeing to become a drug squad informer.

He said that between August 1999 and December 2002, Ian Ferguson, Sadler and Cox sold 10 kilograms of high-grade heroin to the man for $1.5 million.

Mr Leckie said that Joanne Ferguson was introduced to the conspiracy by her husband and participated in laundering and spending substantial proceeds derived from heroin trafficking.

Ian Ferguson is also accused of stealing $369,000 cash and 700 grams of heroin worth $75,000 during a raid on a Braybrook property in August 2000, Mr Leckie said.

Ian Ferguson and Sadler coached the informer to whom they sold heroin on how to avoid arrest, how to flee Victoria and avoid mandatory financial reporting, Mr Leckie said.

After a warrant was issued for the informer's arrest, Sadler allegedly received a bribe of gambling chips and heroin from him at Crown Casino to ensure he was not arrested.

Mr Leckie said that in 2000, Ian Ferguson bought two Toyota Landcruisers and registered one in the name of Sadler's wife. He also allegedly bought a $30,000 BMW from the informer, paying for it in heroin and cash.

Mr Leckie said the Fergusons had spent $819,000 over three years in untraced deposits, cash deposits and purchases. Detective Senior Sergeant Roger told the court that during a swoop on the Fergusons' Lara home last November, police seized their cars, farm equipment and household electrical items.

Between January and April 2001, Joanne Ferguson allegedly kept an account in her maiden name, into which she and her husband deposited cash and cheques under $10,000. When the account was closed, the money allegedly was transferred to other accounts the couple held to avoid mandatory cash transaction reporting, Mr Leckie said.

Detective Senior Sergeant Roger said that while most of the evidence against the four police came from the informer, Ceja investigators had obtained more than 50 witness statements and expected to get another 30.

Duncan Allen, for Joanne Ferguson, said the "humble uniform policewoman" was on anti-depression medication and would suffer in jail.

He said the delay before any trial - estimated to begin in 2005 - formed part of the exceptional circumstances that warranted his client's release.

Magistrate Noel Purcell released Joanne Ferguson on bail with a $100,000 surety.

He refused bail to Sadler and Cox, ruling they had failed to prove exceptional circumstances. The pair, who have 18 years' police experience each, are charged with trafficking and conspiring to traffic a commercial quantity of heroin, while Sadler also faces charges of conspiracy to money launder, perverting the course of justice, blackmail and bribery.

Ian Ferguson did not apply for bail. He is charged with trafficking a commercial quantity of heroin, conspiracy to traffic heroin, perverting the course of justice and conspiracy to launder money. All four face court again in October.

From: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/27/1053801392869.html

The Age seems to be following this story closely. In order to keep the information in one place, I will merge the threads on this topic, and delete off-topic replies.

BigTrancer :)
 
mac: agreed. there is a world of difference between "all cops are fucking corrupt" and "some cops have been and probably are now corrupt and we need eternal vigilence if we are to lessen it".

The underlying message in all of these stories is the criminalization of drugs leads to a black market from which people can make far too much money, be they cops or not. It is just too tempting to make a quick buck if you think you can get away with it.
 
The Age 4th June 2003

Drug squad 'fostered' elite dealers
June 4 2003
By Richard Baker, Darren Gray





Victoria's disbanded police drug squad may have helped create an "elite group of drug manufacturers and suppliers", the State Ombudsman has found.

In a report tabled in State Parliament last night, Ombudsman Barry Perry condemned the squad's practice of supplying large quantities of chemicals to drug manufacturers throughout the 1990s to monitor drug trafficking.

Dr Perry said the policy of "controlled chemical deliveries" had started without authority and put large quantities of chemicals into the hands of drug manufacturers without adequate controls.

Chief Commissioner Christine Nixon abolished the drug squad in 2001.

The report reveals that the squad "accumulated substantial profits" by supplying chemicals.



advertisement

advertisement

Dr Perry said the balance of the chemical purchase account stood at $267,137 in August 2001. But he said: "Because of the lack of proper accounts and record-keeping and the disappearance of records, the details of many transactions will never be known.

"However, the scale and complexity of many of the transactions uncovered is beyond belief."

The report said that although the practice had been in existence since 1992, financial records prior to 1996 were "virtually non-existent".

Dr Perry, who had prepared most of his interim report on the Ceja taskforce investigation into allegations of drug-related corruption before suffering a stroke on April 25, found the money had not been returned to government coffers as it should have been.

He said it had been estimated that 40 to 80 per cent of the chemicals or drugs supplied by police were not recovered.

"It is therefore reasonable to assume that the chemicals or drugs not recovered have been converted into amphetamine and illegally sold to the community."

His report said the Ceja taskforce investigations into corruption had progressed well and predicted the results of the operation would be revealed over the next 12 months.

Although stating that some would be disappointed with the lack of detail in his report, Dr Perry said he would not compromise the investigation by revealing other matters prematurely.

The report also gave details of two successful Ceja investigations that have resulted in the charging of at least seven drug squad members with numerous offences, including drug trafficking, threats to kill, money laundering and the perversion of justice.

Dr Perry alleged that former drug squad detective Wayne Strawhorn had in March this year threatened to kill a Ceja taskforce inspector. Strawhorn was arrested on March 17 on various serious charges and has been remanded in custody.

Dr Perry's report also criticises the former drug squad's use of criminal informers. "Unfortunately, the former drug squad has used unstructured, secretive, unaccountable and sometimes unprofessional methods in handling informers," it said.

The report recommends that police consider changes to the way they manage criminal informers. It suggests that police contact with informers be tape-recorded, "remotely if necessary", for safety reasons.
 
Just a suggestion, maybe we should rename this thread 'Victorian Police Drug Corruption' or something like that, and all news articles about corrupt drug squad officers in Vic and Ceja taskforce outcomes and all related discussions about it should be kept in this thread.

It's just that I've noticed that there's a new article about corrupt Vic cops every few days in either The Age or The Herald Sun.

I love living in Victoria. Our cops are the best. :D
 
Drug squad culture made me break the law

Drug squad culture made me break the law
By Dan Silkstone
June 12 2003


A former detective who admitted yesterday to drug trafficking said he was lured into corruption by a drug squad culture that rewarded rule-breaking.

Stephen Andrew Paton, 41, was a member of the squad for four years, working on major cases.

The County Court heard Paton was building a promising career as a detective, with Judge Michael McInerney describing him as an intelligent man.

Paton fears for his life and his family's safety after pleading guilty to two charges of trafficking in a drug of dependence.

He is at the centre of corruption investigations by the Ceja taskforce, created by the Police Ethical Standards Department after the 2001 arrest of Paton and another drug squad detective, Malcolm Rosenes.


Rosenes, 48, has indicated he will plead guilty to one count of drug trafficking.

A total of seven serving and former police have been charged in relation to the taskforce investigation. The squad was axed in 2001 and replaced by the Major Drug Investigation Division.

Paton worked for the squad's chemical diversion desk and was entrusted with buying chemicals used in the manufacture of amphetamines.

The chemicals were bought from the Croydon factory of manufacturer Sigma and used as part of authorised undercover police operations.

But the 21-year police veteran was doing some chemical diversions of his own.

Between October 1999 and May 2000 he made five secret purchases of pseudoephedrine for a total amount of 5.5 kilograms. The drugs were purchased for only $935 but had an estimated resale value of $110,000.

A second set of illicit purchases between May and December 2000 netted the former detective more than 425,000 cold and flu tablets, with a street value of up to $25 per pack of 90 tablets.

Prosecutor Bill Morgan-Payler, QC, said the purchases were made with bank cheques obtained by Paton using a false driver's licence bearing the name of a person who had died in 1995.

For the defence, David Parsons, SC, said Paton had been an ambitious workaholic who fell into a drug squad culture that rewarded excessive work and rule bending.

He said during major investigations squad members often worked 20-hour days, seven days a week, with an average working day of 16 hours.

Under such conditions, Mr Parsons said, "The police department must bear some responsibility for errors of judgement."

The court heard Paton pushed himself to work the long hours at the expense of his family relationships. "Then if you're not drinking with the boys on a Friday night then you're not one of the mob, not part of the culture," he said.

Mr Parsons said squad detectives competed to be assigned high-profile cases and were rewarded for complying with the prevailing culture and behavioural norms of the squad.

Detectives who did not participate were given menial tasks and publicly embarrassed: "If you're the one effectively cleaning the lavatories, then everybody knows it," he said.

Paton has admitted to receiving between $20,000 and $30,000 for the drugs but Mr Parsons said his client was not a wealthy man. He owned a $280,000 house with a mortgage of $200,000 and had been forced to sell his car to pay legal fees.

The court heard Paton had received threats, including an envelope containing four bullets, one for each member of his family. He is fearful of being identified by prisoners should he receive a custodial sentence, and is concerned of the effect his case will have on his wife, who is also a serving police officer.

Paton was remanded in custody and will be sentenced at a later date.


This story was found at: http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/11/1055220655965.html
 
Ha Ha

Almost started feling sorry for old steve, but that emotion soon evaporated. Sucked in mate, now you know it feels to be on the other side, not so tough anymore without your badge and service revolver. Hope you enjoy your Govenerment funded holiday.

JoKeR =D.
 
Cowboy Mac said:
im sick of the amount of hatred towards police on bluelight. if your not prepared for the consequences (ie. being involved with drugs and its possible repercussions) then collect stamps or something. sure its good that justice provails and any police involved in illegal activity deserves what they get, but generic widespread branding of all police like this totally immature and uncalled for. there are bad apples in every barrel, not all police are like this.

[edit:] the comments this post was aimed at were deleted in the thread merge. my point still stands tho.
Police are trained to be nasty people, its what makes a good cop, from day one they are indoctrinated with an "us and them" attitude. Maybe its necessary, but it doesn't change the fact that they are for the most part quite unpleasant people. That's my two-cents anyway...
 
Fuck 'em, they deserve everything they get and I hope the filthy bastards cop it HARD in jail.
Every cop I've had to deal with has been an arrogant racist ignorant tool.
When I lived in Perth, I got used to a constant regime of arbitrary arrest, minor floggings and unlawful detainment.
When I came to Melbourne, though I haven't been hassled personally, I spent a night searching for a close friend only to find her stumbling down Smith Street after being raped by four plain clothed cops who decided they wanted a bit of fun.
They show their badge then take your fucking life away.
And of course there's always the lives of some of my friends all but ruined by hard time for victimless crimes.
This 'few bad apples' theory is a load of bullshit. Corruption, brutality and blatant abuse of power is the norm in the organised crime gang we call the police. It's the ultimate boys club, with a mandate to do precisely whatever the fuck they want. And they do.
Few bad apples? You'll be lucky if there's a few good ones.

FUCK THEM.
FUCK THEM ALL. :X :X
 
What a load of shit. Police are people just like you - if you had a job where everyone thought you were the enemy you'd have an attitude too. The difference is in the police force they have the power to do something about it, rather than have to smile and say "yes sir" like you have to in most other jobs where you get an asshole customer. There's no need to assume that someone is a prick just because their job often requires them to be one occasionally to ensure they have the upper hand in a situation. In today's society people have so little respect for the law that they are as likely to say "fuck you" to a police officer than "hello", and the police have to face that every day. If it was me, I'd be a prick too under those circumstances.

Most people that I know, and have known, that have worked in the police force are great people. Saying that all police are pricks is like being racist, just because they have blue uniforms doesn't make them all bad ...

In this case - the guy fucked up, and he's now realising that if you do the crime, you do the time. It's reality, and it's "justice" as defined by our legal system. It's not a vengeance for a drug-using public that's for sure, because the harder the police get on drugs, the less likely you are to get off with a warning when you get busted with 2 points.

BigTrancer :)
 
^^ Notice I said "Every cop I've had to deal with has been ......"

My opinion is formed out of personal experience. I made this pretty clear in my above post. Your opinion may be different, and I respect that, but know that I've seen enough shit from what I see as a gang of government run criminals to have a severely low opinion of them. You'd probably feel the same way if you had been through the same shit.

Needless to say, I have a philosophical distaste at all forms of forced authority, most likely derived my my life experience with it. IMO, any body given such powers will always be corrupt. This is the nature of power. Short of getting into a deep philosophical argument about power and human nature, that's all I really have to say.
 
BT Surely someones personal experience counts for something when forming and expressing and opion????

How often have you been arrested, stuck in a cell and treated like a piece of shit by some fat slob of a cop???? How many times have you had a steriod munching muscle boy cop throw you to the ground for standing in the wrong place???? How many times have you had money confiscated from you and never seen it again??? How many mate????


JoKeR :X
 
Actually I've never been that badly treated by cops, but that's not the point.

Look at what BT said about racism. How long would we put up with someone using that sort of language about aboriginies? They may feel they have every reason to harp on about how much they hate them, and list the reasons why, but does that make it acceptable?

I've sat thru many a similar rant coming from racists that have wholeheartedly believe in what they said. And each time I've said the same thing; hate doesn't solve anything. Keep wallowing in that hate and you will get nowhere. Ignorance and hate, that's all it is.

These are all comments about the person saying the things, remember, and have nothing to do with the person or group being villified. You can only change things in them by setting an example within yourself. Lower yourself to their level and you'll just perpetuate the hate.

As I said above there is a world of difference between pointing to an indivdual cop who has broken the law, and making sweeping generalisations about all cops. What you say says more about you than them.
 
^^ Well like I said, my feelings are based on personal experiences, and I have had the displeasure to have dealt with quite a few cops, especially in my younger days. You don't have to agree with me, but for the third time in this thread, let me say that my feelings are far from unfounded.
We're not talking about one cop here, we are talking about every single cop I have dealt with. And believe me, that's a fair few.
Contrary to what you say, I'd argue that my feelings don't come from ignorance at all, and that perhaps yours do.
One thing I've noticed is that no-one who's ever had REAL dealings with the police ever comes back with this whole 'few bad apples' shit.
People who have dealt with them, and I mean REALLY dealt with them, know that power corrupts, and quite well.
I don't want to sound like an asshole here, but if you had been victimised by them systematically for a significant portion of your life, had a close friend raped by four of them, and had mates thrown in jail by them for crimes far pettier than the shit I have personally seen cops get away with, I think your views may be a little different. I really think you are failing to compreghend just how widespread the abuse of power is in the police force. It is RAMPANT.
End of story.

Personally, I find it offensive when someone even attempts to suggest that all of this is merely the work of 'a few bad apples'
 
OT: Actually, forget it. I was way too off topic, and this whole issue has nothing to do with drug discussion.

BigTrancer :)
 
Last edited:
Top