• Welcome Guest

    Forum Guidelines Bluelight Rules
    Fun 💃 Threads Overdosed? Click
    D R U G   C U L T U R E

( A ) History of Dance and Rave Culture

Noodle

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Oct 21, 1999
Messages
36,057
History of Dance Culture and Rave
For that majority of the British population with no direct experience of rave culture, E stands for "danger". It evokes images of teenagers robbed of their lives; kids suffering from heatstroke through over-exertion and dehydration, being rushed to hospital with internal bleeding. Or it triggers mind's eye scenes of frenzied delirium, deranged dancing, zombie-like trances and un-English mass hysteria.
But for the several millions of young and not-so-young people who've passed through the dance-and-drug culture during rave's ten year lifespan, Ecstasy is normal, as banal and benign as a pint of lager. For many, E equals predictable, obvious, even slightly naff; in a word, "safe".
It wasn't always this way. In the late Eighties, Ecstasy was exalted as "the magic pill," a miraculous agent of individual and social transformation. It was the sacrament--the communion wafer, if you will--of a secular religion whose "loved up" adherents believed that house music and MDMA were set to change the world. At the height of the Eighties go-for-it, go-it-alone enterprise boom--whose spirit was encapsulated in Margaret Thatcher's infamous proclamation "there is no such thing as society"--Ecstasy catalysed an explosion of suppressed social energies. Rave's values-- collectivity, spirituality, the joy of losing yourself in the crowd--were literally counter to the dominant culture. Ecstasy's empathy and intimacy inducing effects didn't just offer a timely corrective to Thatcher-sponsored social atomisation; the drug was also the remedy for the English diseases of class-consciousness, reserve and emotional constipation.
But why did all this happen in the context of house and techno music? The drug seemed to fit the music like a glove. On E, its repetitive rhythms induced a blissed trance rather than irritation. And because MDMA intensifies sensations to the brink of pre-hallucinogenic synaesthesia, house and techno's ultra-vivid electronic textures became even more sensuously tactile, so that the music seemed to caress your skin and surround you like a fluid, immersive environment.
You're probably familiar with the story of how a bunch of holidaymking DJs discovered the synergy between house and Ecstasy in the clubs of Ibiza; how they brought the anything-goes "Balearic" vibe back to cool-crippled London in late 1987; how by the summer of '88, the trippy, futuristic sound of Chicago acid house had spawned the most demonized British subculture since punk, which then spilled out into the English countryside in '89 as inner city warehouse parties evolvd into massive raves in fields near the M25. It's a tale that, if not exactly sting-less, is certainly thrice told. But there's a case for saying that musical revolutions actually have their biggest impact a few years after their over-mythologized, "official" origins, when the ideas have filtered from the metropolitan hipster cliques through to suburbia.
Just as punk continued to prosper and mutate in the provinces for years after Sid Vicious's death, similarly rave really became a mass bohemia during the three year period 1990-92. A huge circuit of legal, commercial raves developed, while the liberalisation of licensing hours allowed for rave-style clubs with all-night dancing. It was also in 1990 that home-grown British house music really took off, breaking the dependence on Black American imports from Chicago, Detroit and New York. As sampling and sequencing technology got cheaper, hordes of teenage DJ/producers made tracks dirt-cheap on simple computer set-ups in their bedrooms, then sold these "white label" 12-inches direct to specialist record stores. Propelled by the demographic heft of the rave nation, these "hardcore" rave tunes bombarded the pop charts throughout 1991-92, despite next to no airplay. Hardcore was also the birth of a uniquely British rave sound--a mutant hybrid of hip hop breakbeats, seismic reggae bass, stabbing riffs and mindwarping samples. At the pop end of the hardcore spectrum, groups like The Prodigy, Altern-8, N-Joi, and SL2 invaded the Top Five. At the more underground end, hardcore was the staple of the pirate radio stations that infested the FM airwaves, and the ruling sound at illegal raves, which resurged massively in 1991 through the efforts of crusty-traveller outfits like Spiral Tribe.
As an anarchic cultural force, rave culture peaked in the summer of 1992, when the biggest commercial raves peaked at 25 to 35 thousand, and the techno traveller festival at Castlemorton Common in the West Country drew an estimated forty thousand revellers during its six days of highly illegal existence. By 1993, though, rave culture was in disarray: illegal raves were systematically crushed by local police forces across the country, the commercial rave circuit was in decline owing to bad vibes and rip-off events. Hardcore had always been less utopian than the uplifting house of 1988-89,. During the early Nineties, as ravers took progressively higher doses of Ecstasy and amphetamine, the subculture's metabolic rate accelerated drastically, resulting in ever-escalating tempos and a vibe that exhiliratingly blended euphoria and aggression. The result was a teenage "rush" culture that had more in common with videogames, extreme sports and joyriding than late Sixties transcendence-through-altered-states. By 1993, hyperkinetic hardcore rave plunged into the darkside, becoming the convulsive, bad-trippy soundtrack to paranoia, panic attacks and eerie feelings of the uncanny (all symptoms of long-term Ecstasy abuse). As the scene's atmosphere deteriorated, many abandoned the large one-off raves for the milder song-oriented house music of the club scene; those that persisted with the rave spirit witnessed the evolution of hardcore into jungle, a sound and a subculture as revolutionary as acid house, but blacker in sound and militant in mood.
By the mid-Nineties, rave culture--hitherto a chaos of social and sonic mixing--was stratifying into increasingly narrowcast scenes organised around race, class, and region. Once, you could go to a rave and not know who you'd end up talking to, or what kind of music you'd be exposed to; now, it was all too easy to choose a soundtrack that guaranteed satisfaction but no surprises, and to ensure that you only mixed with "your own kind". Club culture became professionalized, with the rise of "superclubs"like Cream, Renaissance and Ministry of Sound (mini-corporations who raked in the money with merchandising, sponsorship deals, even club tours that took their legendary "vibe" around the county), and with the emergence of a Premier League of star DJs who travelled up and down the UK, earning up to two thousand pounds for a two-hour set, and often playing several gigs per night at the weekend.
All this took the edge out of E culture. As the late Gavin Hills, journalist and acid house veteran, put it: "Ecstasy culture is like a video-recorder now: an entertainment device, something you use for a certain element of pleasure. The club structure is like the pub structure: it has a role in our society." That role is arguably as a kind of safety-valve/social-control mechanism, with youth living for the temporary utopia of the loved-up weekend rather than investing their idealism in a long-term collective project of political change. It's the traditional working class "culture of consolation", with three E's replacing ten pints. And E, the magic pill, has lost both its aura of enchantment and its status as the most favoured drug of the "chemical generation"; it is now just one brain-blitzing weapon in the neurochemical arsenal. Because of this "polydrug" culture of mixing-and-matching, the atmosphere in clubs has changed: instead of the clean, clear high of MDMA and the electric connection between total strangers, the vibe is bleary and untogether. Instead of getting "loved up", people talk of getting "messy".
In 1998, there's a feeling of exhaustion in British dance-and-drug culture, inevitably accompanied by a longing to return to the moment when it all felt so fresh and innocent and world-historical. There's been a boom in old skool nostalgia, with Back to '88/'89 or Back to '91/92 raves. Pop critics usually condemn nostalgia as a weak-willed retreat from the problems and challenges of the present. But sometimes nostalgia can be the recognition of real loss--in rave's case, the loss of the chaos in the culture and the madness in the music. Certain periods in the life of an individual or a culture are simply more intense, precious and *on fire* than others; nostalgia can be the first step towards reigniting the spark.
from: http://www.epidemik.org.uk/features/articles/history_rave.htm
 
wow the first half was really interesting, but the second half was the stereotypical jadedism...
[ 07 February 2003: Message edited by: THE WOOD ]
 
This article appears to be about 5 years old.
It is actually a mish-mashed synopsis of a full book on the subject.
Follow the link for more info.
[ 08 February 2003: Message edited by: Noodle ]
 
Originally posted by THE WOOD:
wow the first half was really interesting, but the second half was the stereotypical jadedism...
Pretty accurate though. All popular culture gets recuperated in the end.
 
Im sure thats how all the day-trippers who were never really into it anyway feel about e and raves. Its simply called mainstreaming, look at the 70s and hippidom. Funny thing about that is that there are still plenty of hippies. Prolly as many as there were when it started, only the media has declared it to be over because its mainstream appeal has floundered. Big deal as far as rave goes, we never wanted those people anyway. Mainstream culture never understands these things. And i know for a fact the case for es involvement is overstated, and all this talk of cultural change is bullshit. In countries where e is rare and expensive, the vibe is just as good. Just go to a good psy trance party.
Sounds like a bunch of post-trip cynical romatisizing about something that is really pretty crap - dance culture mainstreaming. Pity so many people in the UK now think that going to a house club is like going to a real underground party. If u wanna get rid of those who arent adding to the vibe, just crank up the distorted industrial tech - theyll go home pretty quick.
If that doesnt work, use a mailing list or invites.
[ 10 February 2003: Message edited by: Cimora ]
 
Originally posted by Cimora:
Pity so many people in the UK now think that going to a house club is like going to a real underground party. If u wanna get rid of those who arent adding to the vibe, just crank up the distorted industrial tech - theyll go home pretty quick.
Theres plenty of underground house about - never heard of DIY, Smokescreen or TVC?
Theres more to the underground than "distorted industrial tech" and psy-trance y'know.
 
Bohemians have been around for a very long time... generations even.
 
But why did all this happen in the context of house and techno music? The drug seemed to fit the music like a glove. On E, its repetitive rhythms induced a blissed trance rather than irritation.
I hate it when people write about music they know nothing about.
First of all, ALL music is repetative. What makes pop music digestable to the masses is melodic vocals. Without the vocals all of the sudden the music is boring and repetative. Add non-melodic vocals and people say it sounds like abbrasive noise.
Second of all, people who like house like house and don't find it irritating when they listen to it sober.
During the early Nineties, as ravers took progressively higher doses of Ecstasy and amphetamine, the subculture's metabolic rate accelerated drastically, resulting in ever-escalating tempos and a vibe that exhiliratingly blended euphoria and aggression.
Funny, I know a lot of professional drum n bass DJ's and producers that do not use stimulants, rather they favor marijuana and alcohol, yet they keep increasing the tempo of their music.
I have a very difficult time believing that an increase in drug use had anything to do with an increase in tempo.
And it's definantly absurd to even think that for some reason when people decided to take 5 pills instead of 1 pill or a gram of meth rather than a half gram is what inspired people to write faster music.
By 1993, hyperkinetic hardcore rave plunged into the darkside, becoming the convulsive, bad-trippy soundtrack to paranoia, panic attacks and eerie feelings of the uncanny (all symptoms of long-term Ecstasy abuse).
I can't believe this writer is suggesting that the symptoms of long-term ecstasy abuse are what influenced these records.
When a new genre of music is created, it always starts off simple. As time goes by and people start mastering the techniques, they push it farther and farther. That's what was happening in 1993. People were trying to do new things with the sounds and exploit the technology of newer synthesizers and samplers and effects.
What would have been the point of just doing the same thing over and over again?
You don't even have to know about electronic music to understand this. It applies to all music.
This is totally why I hate most music writers. They're close-minded elitists who don't know what they're talking about.
Because of this "polydrug" culture of mixing-and-matching, the atmosphere in clubs has changed: instead of the clean, clear high of MDMA and the electric connection between total strangers, the vibe is bleary and untogether. Instead of getting "loved up", people talk of getting "messy".
I don't know about the UK, but in America the scene always had a "polydrug culture" as early on as 1993. And yet that connection between people and the good vibes and positivity and this and that were around until about 1997.
It wasn't the drugs that changed the scene. It was simply the victim of success. All scenes fall apart as more and more people are exposed. When it goes from underground to mainstream.
There are a billion reasons why this happens and it's ridiculous that someone trying to write such an in-depth article wouldn't know and could be so ignorant.
Big deal as far as rave goes, we never wanted those people anyway.
Definantly. I was talking about things really changed. With raves, it was when it went from people going to be apart of an underground scene and feel connected to something to when the mainstream crowd invaded and did it just to say they did. Normal people who didn't want to be "ravers". Or people who didn't know what raves were about and wanted to be what they read about in magazines or heard about on the news.
I think it's hillarious when I read articles about how mainstream raves are starting to disappear and law enforcement is cracking down and oh what a loss. Pssh. I won't even go out anymore unless I'm going to some small event at a bar with no more than 300 people in attendance. I want to listen to the music without all the other crap that goes along with "the scene" anymore.
 
Top