…Such info must at least be made available to hospitals. IMO not to do so would be a crime.
Possibly the only argument that would carry enough weight
I suppose this all seems like good news, but it is important to note that this database, or at least from the way it currently appears, is not intended to aid or even protect users. I guess you might predict it be beneficial if you support the unrealistic view that reducing supply reduces demand. But bottom line intentions are to catch crooks and reduce the availability of pills etc. It is a police initiative, not a health one.
I feel it almost impossible to conceive this intelligence would be distributed openly to users. It would defeat the purpose. If x pill was seized in Perth and cops were trying to get the rest of the ring in Sydney, Melbourne, wherever; any announcement could tip off these groups and reduce the value of this info altogether.
Anyway, a restricted national database may prove to be of little intelligence value to police. Big networks I’ve heard rumors about appear to distribute and launch a product (new logo etc.) in much the same way as do franchised retailers. Adhering to a set release date ensures no product is circulating early, and as simultaneous release is nation wide or where-ever product branches to, it is very difficult to trace the origin.
Then there is the question of security. If a police only database is universally available to all police, how long would it take before this info is distributed through a back door?
It’s possible the proposed database would also list quantitative amounts. This data could be worth much in the hands of dealers who buy big on blind faith, or have more than one option available.
Perhaps JB will be able to allay some of these fears after the conference - we'll see
If such a system was instead initiated and run by independents, anyone including police could access the database. Harm reduction benefits are obvious, and police wouldn’t have to reveal what they know. Makes perfect sense to me.
The other obvious benefit is the number and variety of pills which would be tested. Police labs would likely rely on seizures, whereas an independent testing body would be utilized by all. Smaller batches would be recorded, and as pillreports now operates, samples would be tested as soon as they hit the streets –perhaps even sooner.
Good Luck with the seminar JB, and if you can, ask if anyone’s aware of Capillary Electrophoresis.
Last week I attended a seminar on "Aspects of the chemistry of the amphetamine and ecstasy classes of illicit drugs" at Griffith Uni, presented by Dr Jeff Rowe (La Trobe). Much of what I heard was nothing new, except for a really interesting talk on Capillary Electrophoresis or CE.
La Trobe Uni has achieved excellent results in the separation and isolation of amphetamines and similar drugs using CE with refined techniques and surfactants. When I asked if this technology is expected to soon replace reagents for in-field testing, “YES!” was the enthusiastic answer.
So perhaps the near future may see users with these affordable devices. Pillreport type boards may still be the best place for users to turn to for both up-to-date reports and repeatable, scientifically refutable/reputable results.