• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

UK: Call to 'tolerate' drug dealers

7zark7

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jun 7, 2004
Messages
2,560
[size=+1]Call to 'tolerate' drug dealers[/size]
Police should tolerate some drug dealing to keep down levels of violent crime, a drugs' think tank has said.


The UK Drug Policy Commission's report says the government's strategy focuses too much on seizures and arrests and not enough on reducing harm.

It says new dealers often take the place of those arrested and can bring new problems such as violent turf wars.

The Home Office said: "Harm reduction underpins every element of our approach to tackling this complex issue."

The commission cites the example of the US city of Boston, where murder rates fell when police offered not to prosecute gangsters for dealing drugs if they stopped killing each other.

It said in the UK's entrenched drugs markets arrests can lead to damaging unintended consequences.

For example, the arrested dealer may be replaced by someone who is more violent.

Or if a backstreet, city-centre hot spot is shut down, dealers may move to a suburban area where the impact and fear imposed on the community is much greater.

And arresting one king-pin drug dealer also raises the possibility of creating a power vacuum with the resulting turf war and spike in violence.

A commission spokesman said enforcement was important and has reduced availability.

But he said beyond a certain point, when you impose greater enforcement you do not necessarily see an equivalent reduction in harm.

"Where drug markets are established in this country you are going to suffer from diminishing returns," he said.

Therefore it could be better not to focus on eradicating the markets altogether, but on making sure they take the least harmful form possible, he said.

The spokesman said that for example, it may be better that dealers are pushed out of local parks - where they create fear in the community and stop children wanting to play - and into a dealer's home.

"It doesn't mean don't arrest and seize, it means you do it in a smarter way so that you constantly think of how it will have a sustainable impact.

"What we all want to do is make communities safer."

But the Home Office said "tough enforcement is a fundamental part" of their strategy, but also acknowledged the complexity of the problem.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We are not complacent; communities do not want to be blighted by the effects of drug misuse and drug dealing.

"That is why police, local authorities and communities must continue to work together so that our streets and communities can be free from the crime and anti-social behaviour they cause."

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/uk/8175550.stm

Published: 2009/07/30 05:00:12 GMT

© BBC MMIX
 
Pretty interesting, not the sort of common sense I expect a drug policy commission to come out with.
 
Independent drug policy commissions come up with this sort of thing ALL THE TIME. It's just that the DEA and ONDCP (here in the US anyway) always ignore any policy suggestions that say anything but "HARDER ENFORCEMENT, TOUGH ON CRIME".
 
Same in the UK.

We had some sensible suggestions made by independent bodies about drug laws in the UK - and the government just ignores every single suggestion they make.
 
Independant (and government sanctioned 'blue ribbon panels') have been recommending serious harm reduction intiatives for 80 years in the US, generally more liberal than the British- but they are always ignored.

However, to have the British government commit to harm reduction philosophy itself is a great thing. Good find :)
 
If a law should not be enforced it shouldn't exist, abolish the law rather then asking police to turn a blind eye. I don't have a clue why so much government effort goes into ignoring bad laws rather then getting rid of them.
 
Top