• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: swilow | Vagabond696

NEWS: The Age - 22/06/09 'Heroin: a curse or a source of meaning?'

hoptis

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
11,083

Heroin: a curse or a source of meaning?
Chris Middendorp
June 22, 2009

FOR a substance that started out as a family-friendly cough suppressant and non-addictive morphine substitute, heroin has certainly gained a fearsome reputation since the late 1890s, when Germany's Bayer Company first marketed it.

There are still some elderly retired midwives around who fondly recall heroin (available legally here until the mid-1950s) as a near-perfect sedative for labour pains.

From pain-free birth to painful death, heroin has become one of our most reviled and misunderstood substances.

I continue to meet people who assure me that heroin isn't just a drug, it's an open invitation to crime and degeneracy, a squirt of anarchy concentrate in a hypodermic.

Despite the fact that it is other substances such as alcohol and speed that tend to fuel violent behaviour, it is heroin that has acquired the sinister status.

And this is why many people become edgy when it is suggested (as it is every year or two) that heroin is making a comeback.

In the late 1990s, as many as 80 per cent of the people we met sleeping rough on the streets were heroin-dependent. Their homelessness was often a byproduct of their addiction and these were the days when the drug flowed so freely that the heroin overdose toll was printed alongside the road toll in the local tabloid.

Collingwood's Smith Street was dubbed Smack Street, many young women took to street sex work to support their dependency, and middle-class families made a concerted effort to avoid the corner of Russell and Bourke streets, then Melbourne's epicentre of drug dealing.

Are those days returning? Did we learn anything from the last heroin crisis?

This decade, heroin has had more putative comebacks than John Farnham, but open street dealing has never quite returned with the same vigour. Until now.

Many community workers are reporting a notable increase in heroin use among clients of housing and health services.

Evidently, the poppy fields of Burma and Afghanistan are fertile with product and the road of supply is open again. Some commentators believe that in recent weeks the purity of the drug has risen from 30 per cent to 70 per cent.

Heroin is stupidly expensive: five kilograms of it has a street value of $9 million (although according to one drug educator I know, the substance would cost about as much to manufacture commercially as sugar).

For the user, a single hit or "point" usually costs about $50. Because the purity varies, they never know what they've got until it's inside them. Sometimes they overdose, sometimes they die. A regular user may need to raise somewhere between $800 to $2000 a week to support their addiction. Hence the rise in prostitution, petty crime and dealing during heroin's ascendancy.

It's this expense that creates many of the drug's social problems. Scoring and paying for heroin becomes the user's entire focus. Finding money for food, clothing or housing may no longer be a priority. Homelessness and malnutrition are frequent side-effects for long-term users.

But all this has been said before. What isn't understood often enough is why some people find heroin so seductive. Heroin may have been conceived as a painkiller, but it is also extremely effective in killing emotional pain. Users I know have described the drug, not as a curse, but as a source of meaning. "Without it, I would have topped myself years ago," one 26-year-old woman told me.

Society is fragmented and it's painful to acknowledge that many people experience sexual, physical and emotional abuse. Overcoming such trauma may be a lifetime's journey. Some never manage it. I have no doubt that the stoned serenity heroin promises is seen as a solution, a tangible pathway out of despair. When he was director of Jesuit Social Services, Peter Norden memorably observed that young people use drugs in response to pain, suffering and isolation — not because they are aiming to be villainous.

In other words, heroin addiction may be best understood as the consequence of profound social dislocation, rather than an individual's weakness. Children do not ask to be traumatised and they do what they can to survive the despair. This is why we've got to reach out to users and offer more constructive therapies to address their psychological injuries.

Ten years ago, widespread heroin use created pervasive outrage in Melbourne and many people were contented with the short-sighted premise that all problems begin and end with the drug user. Heroin users I knew were bashed, spat on and called names such as "junkie" and "dero". Ironically, the perpetrators were often young intoxicated males.

It might help if we abolished words like "drug addict" and "junkie" from the lexicon of social comment. Pejoratives do nothing but efface the humanity from a situation where compassion, not condemnation, would better suit the debate.

If heroin is back to stay, we need to be prepared to look past the substance itself and recognise that this addiction is really a symbol for more formidable problems. Heroin use isn't just the product of crime, it's also the product of family breakdown, neglect and intense feelings of hopelessness.

Chris Middendorp is a program co-ordinator at Sacred Heart Mission.

The Age
 
I think this is a very refreshing article to read in a mainstream paper. Well done to the author for having the courage to make this fairly controversial claim.

But I think there is a problem with the article, in that it still represents a particular 'kind' of person as the 'kind of person' who uses heroin, ie, someone from a messed up background, probably living in poverty, who is broken by their environment, and needs to be healed, and so uses heroin.

What about all of the middle class kids out there using heroin just for a bit of risque pleasure, or the well off functional users who live otherwise completely conventional lives? I think ignoring the fact that a wide range of people use heroin in favour of a focus on the 'traditional' notion of 'junkies' perpetuates certain stereotypes.

I'm sure this perspective comes from the background of the author (Sacred Heart Mission), and I welcome this kind of perspective in the mainstream press, but not all heroin users are 'broken' and living in poverty, and I think it would be better to recognise that a diverse array of people use heroin, in order to reduce the stigma attached to the drug.
 
Really good article, great to see something with some common sense in the mainstream media.
 
Yeah basically a great article - but I have to agree with satricion - the author has made the classic error of classifying all use as "abuse".

Some other slight technical errors - although importation of heroin was banned in Australia in 1954, stockpiles were used until they ran out - I have spoken to midwives who administered heroin to women in labour in the 70s in Australia (they must have stockpiled a shitload!!)

Also - the author makes the common error of attributing homelessness to drug use. In fact, a comprehensive study done by Hanover (I think in 2004) in Melbourne identified that the causal pathway in fact most often runs the opposite way - homelessness is a cause of (problematic and/or heavier) drug use; particularly amongst young people.
 
Cool article, it is refreshing to see this side of the story being put across in mainstream media. I hope to see more stuff like this in the future.
 
Top article Chris!!!

It's good to see something semi realistic other than the usual regurgitated rubbish we usually see in the mainstream press. I have no doubt that this will be quickly disregarded by the majority as the word of a 'junky lover'. It would be nice to see these types of articles more often but I think it will be rebutted to appease the today tonight watching sheep. :\
 
Actually given the lack of response in today's Age (letters page) - it's probably sunk like a stone out of sight. No-one likes to talk too much about drugs - people might think you take them ;)
 
Well written, but in my view, nothing excuses the crime or other forms of antisocial behaviour that people engage in, in order to support their use.

That applies to any drug.
 
Was watching the ABC last week, you can buy a kilo of opium in Afghanistan for $800...but then again who can trust da media. Opium was used for thousands of years, it is only recently loonatics decided to inject purified opium on a regular basis.
 
Top