• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Britain's top drug advisor says LSD should be downgraded

melange

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 11, 2006
Messages
9,414
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...viser-wants-to-downgrade-LSD-from-A-to-B.html




Now Home Office drugs adviser wants to downgrade LSD from A to B
LSD, the powerful hallucinogenic drug made famous by The Beatles, should be downgraded from a Class A drug, according to the Government's drugs adviser.



The news has emerged after the Professor David Nutt was ordered to apologise by the Home Secretary for saying that taking ecstasy was no worse than riding a horse.

Prof Nutt is chairman of the Government's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, which is set to recommend that ecstasy should be downgraded from A to B.

In a radio interview last year, months before he became chairman of the council, Prof Nutt disclosed that he also favoured downgrading LSD from A to B.

He said: "There are several drugs that are in class A and probably should not be there, like ecstasy and LSD. There are other drugs that should be up the scale.

"Ecstasy and LSD which tend to cause little dependence and relatively moderate degrees of personal damage are probably too highly classified."

LSD is ranked as a class A drug under the Misuse of Drugs Act. The maximum penalty for supplying the drug is life imprisonment.

Prof Nutt, who took over as chairman of the council last November, went on to call for a major overhaul of the drugs classification rules in Britain.

He said: "I think it is time to have a complete review of all the drug laws. And I would like to have that in the UK."

Prof Nutt said he was content that drugs like "heroin, crack, cocaine and metamphetamine pure" should remain as Class A drugs.

He told Radio New Zealand: "It is quite hard to move drugs out of classes. In the UK we have has these class system now since 1971.

"Only one drug has ever been moved down a class and a couple have moved up. Cannabis moved down and opiates moved up."

Prof Nutt said that if alcohol emerged as a substance in modern Britain it would be classified as an illegal Class B drug.

He said: "If alcohol was suddenly to emerge in society now and it was suddenly assessed as other drugs of abuse it would be rated as a B class drug and therefore not be made legal."

The Daily Telegraph disclosed last week how Prof Nutt had written in an academic journal that taking the drug was no more dangerous than an addiction to horse riding.

In the House of Commons on Monday, Jacqui Smith told MPs that his comments sent the wrong message to young people about the dangers of drugs.

She said: "I made clear to Prof Nutt that I felt his comments went beyond the scientific advice that I expect of him as the chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs."
 
I'm glad to see the drug with the least dependance risk is being shown in that light and not an acid makes you crazy one.
 
The whole classification system in the UK is a joke and needs scrapping. We need open-minded, unbiased research into the short and long term effects of recreational drug use. Only then can the Government created a sensible classification system - hopefully decriminalising a few substances in the process.
 
I think thats half the reason they have legalised anything..

...once the ball starts rolling its hard to stop.. Once they legalise amp.. theyd have to consider MDxx... and when thats out the 2C's... then another class of drugs n so on...
 
its interesting to see the consideration in changing classes of them though. Lsd and mdma really aren't all that bad for the body. its about time some things are looked at again with all of the research that has been conducted over the years.
 
^I'd argue that LSD is not bad for you body at all except in the case of pregnancy or extreme misuse.
 
Top