you forgot to stamp your feet.blissfulMenace said:just so you know, im not going to let this go until i hear some input from the people above who matter...
Ahh I promise I didn't see that until after I posted. Should probably learn to read everything before I open up my big mouth. The only issue is that it would probably be more than just images.a buddy of mine had a good idea, what if we just change words to "words and images"
Highways are built to accommodate traffic, not the reverse.blissfulMenace said:and the reason the discussion about it dies out is because, as i did, everyone figures its a futile effort as no movement comes from it.
An arts forum, if it is as important as it is made out to be (and I myself also believe it is), has to exist on its own merits, IMO, not piggyback another, which is what it's doing now anyway. I agree though that it would fit better within the Music-Words-Film grouping.a buddy of mine had a good idea, what if we just change words to "words and images"
that is exactly why i believe we need to rid SO of the burden of all the art threads that take up the first pageAn arts forum, if it is as important as it is made out to be (and I myself also believe it is), has to exist on its own merits, IMO, not piggyback another, which is what it's doing now anyway. I agree though that it would fit better within the Music-Words-Film grouping.
did you read the previous discussion thread? from the previous discussion:blissfulMenace said:i bet if you make a poll most bl'ers would love to see it...
alasdairm said:with respect, it's the easiest thing in the world to click a button which says "i'd participate in an art forum".
in an attempt to put this in perspective i had a look at the number of art-related threads started in second opinion by those in this thread who are in support of such a forum (about 14 posters). there are 5000 threads in second opinion right now and i found 6.
i guess my point is that if the people in this thread arguing for such a forum aren't starting art-related threads, who's to say anybody will?
these points are not intended to stifle discussion. rather, to show that a poll is really not that helpful in isolation.alasdairm said:so it's been just under a week since this discussion faded out and, as far as i can tell, there's been only one new art-oriented thread started in second opinion...
if each of the 31 people who voted for a new forum had bothered to start just one thread each, i might think there was something to the poll but, as it stands, to me it's just meaningless...
It pains me to say this, but you're absolutely right.Originally Posted by alasdairm
with respect, it's the easiest thing in the world to click a button which says "i'd participate in an art forum".
in an attempt to put this in perspective i had a look at the number of art-related threads started in second opinion by those in this thread who are in support of such a forum (about 14 posters). there are 5000 threads in second opinion right now and i found 6.
i guess my point is that if the people in this thread arguing for such a forum aren't starting art-related threads, who's to say anybody will?
a buddy of mine had a good idea, what if we just change words to "words and images"
You mean like this? A poll is simply an opinion. The fervour we see again and again in people's desire to see an arts forum is simply intent. Intent plus opinion does not always translate into content. In fact, in the case of arts content, it rarely seems to be the case.blissfulMenace said:i bet if you make a poll most bl'ers would love to see it
Seven out of those threads are related to the photo contest and one related to the 2-d art contest (which has withered away already). That makes the picture of averages an even sadder one. A photo contest does not an arts forum make. It was a fantastic idea by BA and I am more than happy to upkeep it (and enjoy doing so), and it can certainly serve as a building block for an arts forum. Let's face it though, it's the only block right now.alasdairm said:currently in so there are 8 (out of 40) art-related threads on the front page. that's only 20% and, even in mlb, that's a pretty poor batting average
Miss Peks said:I might have an unpopular opinion about this, but personally I think that if we were to have a sub forum for art somewhere (second opinion atm) then I think it would be much better suited with words. Yes it would need some major work happening before we could get it organised, but they're both creative topics and I think they're better suited together (even if it's just link wise).
Second opinion to me is asking about practical advice and sometimes personal advice as well. I know there's some art threads in there atm, but to me they don't mix.