ilikeacid
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2006
- Messages
- 975
Okay, so has anyone actually gone to the Aus & NZ section of Pillreports.com and read some of the new pill reports that have been posted lately?!
Back when I started to take an interest in what might be in the pills I was consuming, about a year and a half ago, I remember most of the new posted pills had pictures, were mainly described as what they tested as and had comments that made sense.
These days - at least the first page of the Aus & NZ page - is riddled with UN-TESTED, poorly described pills, which have even poorer user reports! Is "i had 800 of em in my hand and they felt good" a report worth reading?? 8(
Do people agree, has pill reports really gone down hill or is it just because I've become more educated about pills and their effects and therefore expect a higher quality of information?
And if PR.com (aus & nz section only) is losing its reputation as an excellent harm minimisation site then, is it really still reducing the level of harm it once was, or mearly posting pill heads opinions of what the next sic bik is?
Back when I started to take an interest in what might be in the pills I was consuming, about a year and a half ago, I remember most of the new posted pills had pictures, were mainly described as what they tested as and had comments that made sense.
These days - at least the first page of the Aus & NZ page - is riddled with UN-TESTED, poorly described pills, which have even poorer user reports! Is "i had 800 of em in my hand and they felt good" a report worth reading?? 8(
Do people agree, has pill reports really gone down hill or is it just because I've become more educated about pills and their effects and therefore expect a higher quality of information?
And if PR.com (aus & nz section only) is losing its reputation as an excellent harm minimisation site then, is it really still reducing the level of harm it once was, or mearly posting pill heads opinions of what the next sic bik is?