• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Bluelight stars in scientific article: Prescription Drug tampering

Tronica

Executive Director
Staff member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
4,410
This article came out last week:

Cone, E. J. (2006). Ephemeral profiles of prescription drug and formulation tampering: Evolving pseudoscience on the Internet. Drug Alcohol Depend, 83 Suppl 1, S31-39.

Abstract:

The magnitude of non-therapeutic use, or misuse of prescription pharmaceuticals now rivals that of illicit drug abuse. Drug and formulation tampering enables misusers to administer higher doses by intended and non-intended routes. Perceived motives appear to be a combination of interests in achieving a faster onset and enhancing psychoactive effects. Narcotic analgesics, stimulants, and depressants are widely sought, examined, and tampered with for recreational use. This review examines tampering methods reported on the Internet for selected pharmaceutical products. The Internet provides broad and varied guidance on tampering methods that are specific to drug classes and unique formulations. Instructions are available on crushing, separating, purifying and chemically altering specific formulations to allow changes in dosage, route of administration, and time course of effects. Many pharmaceutical formulations contain features that serve as "barriers" to tampering. The nature and effectiveness of formulation barriers vary widely with many being overcome by adventurous misusers. Examples of successes and failures in tampering attempts are frequently described on Internet sites that support recreational drug use. Successful tampering methods that have widespread appeal evolve into recipes and become archived on multiple websites. Examples of tampering methods include: (1) how to separate narcotic drugs (codeine, hydrocodone, oxycodone) from excipients and non-desirable actives (aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen); (2) overcoming time-release formulations (beads, layers, matrices); (3) removal of active drug from high-dose formulations (patches, pills); (4) alteration of dosage forms for alternate routes of administration. The development of successful formulations that inhibit or prevent drug/formulation tampering with drugs of abuse should take into consideration the scope and practice of tampering methods available to recreational drug users on the Internet.

Starring:

Brown Deer, 2004. The New Bluelight—Ritalin Snort or Swallow? [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?postid=2436273#post2436273 (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

Ephemeral, 2004. The New Bluelight – Adderall – How to Avoid XR? [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?threadid=164719&highlight=adderall (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

Paradoxcycle, 2004. The New Bluelight—Oxy Just Doesn’t Work? [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?threadid=182683&r=48 (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

The Armed Forces, 2004. The New Bluelight—Adderall XR Lemonade (extraction technique) [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?threadid=150140 (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

The Wood, 2001. The New Bluelight—Pharmecutical Companies have Come a Long Way [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?postid=2635268#post2635268 (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

Xenoc, 2004. The New Bluelight—Concerta I Wannaw Do Some Linezzzz [online]. Available at: http://www.bluelight.nu/vb/showthread.php?postid=1752814#post1752814 (Accessed on April 5, 2005).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was not sure where to post this - but thought people (and Bluelight as a whole) might be interested to see Bluelight discussion being referenced in a journal article. Perhaps this should spark a discussion about whether people really consider the possibility of their writing because quoted by complete strangers for reasons they may not endorse... I have the pdf of the article if people would like to read it.

cheers
tronica
 
It's not really media... but this could go well in Drugs in the Media?

Or maybe in Other Drugs...

I'm really not sure.

What I'll do is shift it over to DitM, and if you guys over there think it ain't really appropriate, then please shift as you see fit :)

CB :)
 
AB-BP-24818.jpg
 
Abuse of prescription drugs fuelled by online recipes

Abuse of prescription drugs fuelled by online recipes

03 June 2006
NewScientist.com news service
Hazel Muir


"IF YOU just swallow them you will not be getting the full effects." Instead, the website tells abusers of a common prescription drug to crush the time-release beads and snort them, or swallow the powder in a piece of tissue paper to get a longer-lasting "hit".

These words could kill. Yet tampering with prescription drugs to amplify their effects is a growing health hazard. A study published this month suggests that droves of people are turning to the internet to search for and swap advice on how to tamper with prescription drugs, for instance, by snorting those prescribed for hyperactivity disorders, or chewing skin patches containing potentially lethal painkillers (Drug and Alcohol Dependence, DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2005.11.027). Toxicologists are calling on pharmaceutical companies to wise up to these tricks.

"Drug misusers are tampering with the drugs to get high, and you get high by getting the drug in faster or giving a bigger dose," says Edward Cone, the author of the study and a toxicologist at ConeChem Research in Maryland, which advises the pharmaceutical industry on drug abuse prevention. "All of these drugs are toxic or lethal at certain levels, so this is a very real health issue."

In March, the International Narcotics Control Board released a report identifying North America, especially the US, as a hotspot for prescription drug misuse. In 2003, the US National Survey of Drug Use and Health showed that the number of people misusing legal painkillers, tranquillisers, stimulants and sedatives had reached 6.3 million - more than twice the number taking cocaine.

Users get hold of the drugs by every route imaginable, including conning doctors with bogus ailments, using prescriptions intended for other people or buying them from illegal internet pharmacies. "In the US, the abuse of pharmaceutical drugs is reaching epidemic proportions," Cone says.

The appearance of websites detailing the recreational use of these drugs, which even post recipes on how to heighten the hit, is the latest twist in this trend (see "Recipe for abuse"). The traffic on some of the sites is enormous. One, which includes around 3000 personal accounts of experiences with a wide range of legal and illicit drugs, receives an average of 420,000 hits a day. "Some people post their progress on beating a new formulation almost on a daily basis. Then others respond with questions and experiences of their own - it feeds on itself," says Cone.

For instance, some sites suggest ways of tampering with skin patches designed to slowly release the opioid painkiller fentanyl. Users sometimes extract the drug from a patch to eat, inject or smoke. Yet a single patch can contain enough fentanyl to kill several people, according to toxicologist Bruce Goldberger from the University of Florida in Gainesville. "It's like Russian roulette - you just don't know how much drug you're going to get," he says.

“Users sometimes extract fentanyl from a patch to eat or inject. Yet a single patch can contain enough to kill several people”
Goldberger says the tampering problem began to escalate in the mid-1990s when OxyContin came on the market. OxyContin, made by Connecticut-based company Purdue Pharma, is a sustained-release formula of oxycodone, another powerful opioid painkiller. Recreational users quickly realised they could defeat the sustained-release formula by chewing the tablets, or crushing them to snort or inject.

Surveys by the US Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) suggest the number of emergency hospital visits involving oxycodone misuse increased about 10-fold between 1996 and 2004. Estimates suggest that in 2004 there were more than 36,000 admissions involving misuse of the drug, now nicknamed "hillbilly heroin".

There are no official US national statistics on how often drug tampering leads to a fatal overdose. But tampering is implicated in roughly 200 deaths each year in Florida alone, according to Goldberger, whose lab oversees much of the state's post-mortem investigations. He adds that because the circumstances of a drug overdose are often unclear, that is probably the tip of the iceberg.

Whether the popular online schemes for drug tampering are effective is often unclear. "Many of the procedures look like they would work," says Cone. "But as far as I know, there is no one evaluating them." Users therefore have no way of assessing them - except by giving them a go.

Goldberger says he was reluctant to discuss the problem of drug tampering publicly several years ago, for fear of planting the idea in someone's head. "But today, the information is already out there," he says. "If you don't know how to tamper with a product all you have to do is a Google search."

So what should be done? Goldberger says education about the hazards of drug tampering is vital, along with systematic surveys to uncover the real extent of the problem. Cone argues that companies could also do much more to make their drugs tamper-resistant, by making tablets that are likely to be abused harder to crush and snort, for instance (see "Tamper proof"). While these measures wouldn't stamp out drug tampering completely, "we can certainly do better than we're doing now," says Cone.

“The number of emergency hospital visits involving oxycodone increased 10-fold between 1996 and 2004”
The good news is that some barriers to tampering seem to be genuinely effective. Disgruntled recreational users report online that one methylphenidate drug called Concerta, a stimulant used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), is very difficult to crush and snort. One user's verdict reads: "No effects to very minimal with an irritated nose full of chunks."

Another example is Marinol, used to treat nausea in chemotherapy patients. Marinol capsules contain a synthetic version of the psychoactive chemical in cannabis mixed with sesame oil, which is hard to remove. That means, in other words: "Smoking it is disgusting and tastes like a bowl full o'seed".

Pharmaceutical companies are starting to take the problem seriously, says Nora Volkow of the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Bethesda, Maryland. For instance, Purdue Pharma is reformulating OxyContin to make it less easy to tamper with. Novartis, which makes Ritalin, an ADHD drug that some people take recreationally, has also developed a one-a-day Ritalin tablet that parents can give their children before they go to school, so there is less risk of the drug falling into the wrong hands in playgrounds.

"We have a role to play, but we're not the only ones," says Chris Lewis, a spokesman for Novartis, who believes that society as a whole should be doing more to educate people about the hazards of misusing prescription drugs. He stresses that the company makes sure doctors are fully aware of the drug's uses and potential risks.

Some industry experts question whether tamper-proofing is the best route. "We make medicines in the most palatable and effective form for the patients who need it - that is our responsibility," says Richard Ley, a spokesman for the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. He says making drugs tamper-proof would make them more expensive for patients and health services, and delay the marketing of vital new medicines.

That view is understandable, says Volkow. But she argues that prescription drug abuse is now so out of control in the US that cooperation from pharmaceutical firms is essential. "We have an urgent problem that needs to be stopped. In our high-school surveys of kids aged 12 to 18, 10 per cent have tried opiates for non-medical reasons - it's gigantic."

From issue 2554 of New Scientist magazine, 03 June 2006, page 6


Recipe for abuse
Internet forums document a bewildering range of recipes for tampering with prescription drugs. For example, users of some online forums recommend snorting oral amphetamines and drugs to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. This defeats the tablets' sustained-release mechanisms and delivers a faster, more intense hit.

Users have also twigged that they can manipulate the absorption rate of prescription amphetamines by mixing them with chemicals that alter their pH. The drugs can be addictive, and very high doses can raise blood pressure and cause dangerous heart problems.

Other commonly abused prescription drugs are tranquillisers, which recreational users frequently mix with other drugs, taking a tranquilliser to combat a cannabis-induced panic, for instance. Long-term use can lead to physical dependence and addiction.

The most commonly abused prescription drugs are opioid painkillers. Most misusers take these drugs orally, but some people snort them. Websites also detail ways to "purify" the narcotic component by dissolving the tablets. These drugs are addictive, while a large single dose can cause severe respiratory problems and death.


Tamper proof
Drug companies could use a variety of chemical tricks to discourage tampering:

Simply making tablets harder to crush can prevent users snorting or injecting them.

Companies could add a substance that blocks any psychoactive hit if the user snorts or injects a drug.

To prevent people "purifying" the narcotic component by dissolving the drug, manufacturers could design tablets that turn into a useless jelly in water.

They could add a waxy coating or matrix that traps the drug if someone tries to extract it through heating.

In some cases, just a nasty flavour or dye might be enough to discourage all but the most hardened drug abuser.


Link: http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg19025544.200.html
 
Last edited:
another "you are playing russian roulette" scare tactic. life is 'like playing russian roulette'
 
7zark7 said:
In some cases, just a nasty flavour or dye might be enough to discourage all but the most hardened drug abuser.

I don't think you need to be 'hardened' to put up with a bad taste ;)
 
Wow, we're made out to be a bunch of really cunning, evil, conniving, scum.

Now I feel bad...
 
What i find interesting is that this researcher has treated online forum posts as published material. Is that how we treat them? Do we expect them to be published and referenced, and collated without any further input?
 
I think the anonymity of the forums had a large contribution to using it as a source.

I should have seen it coming, but it makes me sad that there's this huge push to make them tamper proof. dim future for fun pharmies. :\
 
I'm disappointed that they didn't quote any posts about rectal administration. I mean, that's like the BL special.
 
Tronica said:
What i find interesting is that this researcher has treated online forum posts as published material. Is that how we treat them? Do we expect them to be published and referenced, and collated without any further input?

indeed. if they were considered some sort of a vox pop then it's more defensible, even if the initial poster isn't fully aware of the public nature of their discussion.
 
Top