• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

price of a life-saving overdose treatment has increased 680% to $4,500 in last 3 yrs

avcpl

Bluelighter
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
1,147
http://www.businessinsider.com/price-of-naloxone-auto-injector-evzio-2017-2

An emergency medication often referred to as an "antidote" for opioid overdoses has been skyrocketing in price over the last few years.

The device, the only auto-injector version of naloxone, is called Evzio, and it's made by Kaleo.

Naloxone instantly reverses opioid overdoses by blocking the drug from interacting with the brain’s receptors. It has been on the market since 1971.

In 2014, when Evzio was approved in the US, the list price was $575 for a two-pack. Now, it has a list price of $4,500 — an increase of 680%.

Kaleo, a private company based in Richmond, Virginia, also owns Auvi-Q, the emergency epinephrine device that made headlines in October 2016 when the company announced it would come back to the US as competition to the EpiPen after getting recalled a year earlier. The Auvi-Q and Evzio use the same auto-injector technology to deliver their respective emergency medications.

The list price for a two-pack of the Auvi-Q comes in at $4,500 as well, though the company maintains that the cash price for people without insurance is $360 and that more than 200 million people will be able to get the device with a $0 copay. That list price is roughly 640% higher than the list price of the EpiPen, which was singled out in August 2016 for increasing the price of a two-pack by 500% over the course of seven years.

Now, the list prices of the two drugs is catching the eye of Democratic Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who sent a letter Friday to Kaleo asking for more information about the company's pricing strategy.

List prices don't often tell the whole story when it comes to a drug's price. There are other players in the system that each take a piece, which means that what a drugmaker actually receives could be lower even as the list price rises. Kaleo declined to comment on its average net price for Evzio.

"When setting the 'list' price for products, kaléo always starts with the needs of the patient first and then engages with multiple stakeholders in the healthcare system," Kaleo's vice president of corporate affairs Mark Herzog said in a statement emailed to Business Insider. "Following these discussions, in order to help ensure our product is available as an option to most patients for $0 out-of-pocket, we set the list price at $4500."

The rationale of the company's pricing strategy didn't seem to satisfy Klobuchar.

"I understand that Kaleo is trying to mitigate the impact on consumers by providing Evzio for free to cities, first responders, and drug treatment programs, and offering various programs to help ensure that no consumer pays the $4,500 price for Auvi-Q," Klobuchar wrote. "While these subsidies and programs are noteworthy, I am concerned that they do not address the underlying problem of rising prescription drug costs."

This isn't the first time rising naloxone prices have been called out. Until recently, Evzio's price had been $3,750 per two-pack. And across the board, naloxone prices have been skyrocketing, as Business Insider's Harrison Jacobs has reported.

However, most other naloxone options — syringes, and a nasal spray — have list prices in the hundreds for sets of 10 vials or two nose sprays. As a proportion of total naloxone market, Evzio made up roughly a third of prescriptions in 2016, according to data from IMS Health.

It remains to be seen how many prescriptions transfer from the EpiPen to the Auvi-Q. Before it was recalled, Auvi-Q only had a small share of the market at a list price of around $500.

But its high list price is already turning off health insurers and pharmacy benefits managers. FiercePharma reports that Cigna, Humana, and the pharmacy benefits manager Express Scripts have come out against the pricing strategy for Auvi-Q, while Aetna is putting it on restricted coverage. The device officially launches in the US on February 14.
 
why can't someone else make a naloxone autoinjector? naloxone is off patent, and auto injectors are well known an unpatentable, combining the two is not patentable.

probably congress preventing anyone from manufacturing a competing product bc they are getting some nice bribes i would gues
 
The pharma companies couldnt ask for a bigger windfall. This is like the IPO on suffering and they are buying the whole lot.
 
If insurers and health care providers want to pay for this, that's their choice, but it's hardly the only option. Generic naloxone has worked fine for decades and continues to do so.
 
A potential monopoly-in-the-making on an essential antidote during an unprecedented outbreak of opioid overdoses. In other words, talk about kicking someone repeatedly while they're already down and in danger of DYING.

Sigh - Karl Marx's outstanding literary contribution in general notwithstanding, my contention has always been that communism is fundamentally incompatible and unsustainable in the long-term given the origins of mankind's societal structuring in conjunction with our natural drive to better one-another.

Ergo, I've always considered the especially-competitive management of our resources and productivity to be paramount if we are to continue accumulating a steady growth of empirical knowledge regarding life's most enduring mysteries et al. But for fuck's sake, if appropriate regulations aren't in place to prevent the rise of oligarchic monopolies and rampant corporate-whoring by partisan hacks who only serve their billionaire puppet masters, then the we might as well promptly duck and cover, because the cards will come crashing down to devastate our quality of life yet again.

Edit: And sadly, those who should be held most-directly responsible for disastrous economic recessions such as the recent subprime mortgage crisis shall likely receive nothing more than a meaningless slap on the wrist (or in the case of those most affected, a slap in their faces as the cherry on top). Sad.
 
Last edited:
the market and rights were cornered on naloxone a few years ago.. roll my handle and such on google
 
right... what junkie is gonna spend 4,500$ fuckin dollars on 2 naloxone shots fail
A) not all addicts are poor. who ends up in expensive rehab clinics???

B) government(s)/insurance/NGO is the client.
 
Why does an ER need an auto injector? Rig it up and shove it in a muscle or vein?
 
There's good money in reviving junkies. We can't just let them die. If they can't pay we can always bill the next guy with money $4,000 for an ER visit and some antibiotics. Nobody wants us to feel sympathy for junkies either cause they deserve it. Martin Shkreli would be proud :|

turingceo-800x430.jpg
 
There's good money in reviving junkies. We can't just let them die. If they can't pay we can always bill the next guy with money $4,000 for an ER visit and some antibiotics. Nobody wants us to feel sympathy for junkies either cause they deserve it. Martin Shkreli would be proud :|

turingceo-800x430.jpg
I'm glad his ass is sitting in jail. What a little shit head
 
Top