why such a low dose? 500mg is not harmful at all.
He only gets one first cycle, it's the best one, why chance it???
I had bloodwork after being on a gram for MONTHS and it was damn near perfect.
I do appreciate how you're thinking, it's how a lot of guys tend to think. But it's not entirely logical. If you don't need more, you don't take more. This guy's entire bodybuilding gains aren't going to be defined by his first cycle. Anyone on a first cycle - or for that matter on their 3rd, 50th, or hundredth - can gain
respectably on 250mg, almost as well as 500mg, but with trivial sides, fewer health risks, and easier recovery without need for PCT.
The gains from conservative cycles are also more likely to be more sustainable afterwards, and less unhealthily yo-yo, which is often completely overlooked by most guys advocating unnecessary cycles with excessive doses and compounds. To be honest most guys who've learnt their way from forums have never even tried doing low dose cycles because they're told they won't work, and it's become accepted wisdom; this despite 250mg being several multiples of natural testosterone level.
When you've been doing this for 10/15/20 years or more, you begin to realise how strange it is that guys are so obsessed with the perfect cycle, or the perfect first, second, third cycle etc, as if it makes
any difference at all in the long run. Long term success is based on long-term consistency, not the specific characteristics of an individual cycle. The trick for sustainable success (unless, perhaps, you're above-average genetically) is to learn how to do a lot with a little. And most of the time it's learning how to diet/train/cardio optimally.
As for your bloodwork, unfortunately that doesn't tell you anything about the cardiovascular harm that you may have endured on your cycle. Please take a read through the forum to look at some of our discussions on longer-term AAS harms to understand the risks. I really need to pull them all together in a sticky at some point to make it easier.