Hmph!
I've found an article related to this. You can review the article here:
http://www.dailybusinessreview.com/Web_Public_Stories/expunging.html
In that article it states that one or two of the major providers of this type of data
will remove your information from their files if you contact them and can prove to them that you have a legitimately modified conviction.
I'm wondering about is if prospective employees who consent to allowing their criminal background to be investigated by a prospective employer are offered the opportunity to receive a copy of the results of their criminal background check. I know that when a person applies for something on credit or a loan, and their credit history is checked, more often than not,
they're offered a copy of the report, why shouldn't people be apprised of what's on their criminal background investigation reports, too?
If there's not a whole lot of that going on, maybe there needs to be some sort of change in legislation as far as getting copies of those reports for the people who are authorizing them, because I believe private citizens have the right to know what information is ON any and ALL of their records, especially if it means the difference between becoming a productive member of society, or being forced to live a life of crime. I agree with the attorneys in the above-referenced article who said that data mining is an invasion of privacy. It makes the process of attempting to conceal or erase your criminal convictions and having a "second chance" useless. For all the talk about second chances, and the rehabilitation of criminal offenders, what kind of message are apartment complexes, universities, hiring companies and all the people who enable them really sending to people who may have "checkered pasts?"
I realize that this is the age of information and that information has never been so easy to obtain. But when you get arrested, and go to jail or prison, or court mandated treatment facilities, there's all this talk about "paying your debt to society." Nothing makes me angrier than that sequence of words, because those words in that order mean nothing in this day and age. If you're a felon, you're screwed, basically. If you happen to get arrested often, or have any other regular interaction with law enforcement, it's public record, and anyone who has the resources can and
will have access to that data.
I
completely sympathize with you on this, seep. I was arrested for manufacturing and discharging "dangerous" explosives within the city limits a long time ago. I took the case to trial, and I got acquitted. Regardless of that fact,
every single time I get pulled over or questioned by LE, they've gotta call the bomb squad, the fire department, the ATF, the DEA, the state police, the sheriff, at least ONE ambulance, and about three deputies (and one has to be female) and any city police who aren't busy to attend my routine traffic stop event... There will literally be, like, at least 10+ emergency vehicles on the scene if I get stopped because that stupid arrest still shows up on my NCIC, [arrest record] some 10 years later. I can't even begin to imagine how much it costs the taxpayers in community resources for all those civil servants to be at ONE traffic stop. It's totally retarded. I was never even CONVICTED of the shit. Some agencies can even SEE that I was acquitted, yet
every single wise ass cop STILL smirks and asks me if I have any explosives on my person or in my vehicle. It's fucking embarrassing.
The only other thing I've thought about doing is contacting the county where I was arrested for that and asking them to remove the record of my arrest, or, at the very least, do something about how the charge is listed. Since I had a jury trial, there's a transcript of the proceedings and the findings of the jury. There should also be a record of them having to refund me my bond money since I was found to be "not guilty,"of the charges against me for what that's worth. So maybe that would be one way of getting that cleared up.
Personally, I think it's nothing short of FUCKED UP that,
I have to tell
the COUNTY that
I'm INNOCENT when they paid for my trial. I don't understand why they're so eager to log and document arrests, indictments, and convictions but there's literally no rush (TEN YEARS) to update modified or correct / destroy erroneous records. It seems to me that keeping those kinds of files current and up-to-date would be one of the more PRESSING issues for the clerks of court and whoever else. I think if they're going to initiate the storage of this information, the least they can do is keep it up to date, no matter WHO it benefits.
I also wanted to mention that many times arrest data is not accurate or comprehensive. The standards for the completion of paperwork in some counties probably isn't what it should be. This is another reason why I think anyone who is having their criminal background investigated needs to know what others are seeing. I'd be willing to bet that at least 25% of the data dealing JUST with arrests is either false, inaccurate, misspelled, dated incorrectly, or somehow otherwise disputable. I've had times when I've been arrested and they couldn't think of anything to charge me with so they held me as long as they could-with no bond, might I add, until they absolutely HAD to let me go. Do you think they tore up my booking record, fingerprint card, and mugshots? Somehow, I don't think so.
I wonder what those show up as...