So the standard consensus seems to be to harvest when most of the trichomes are amber. It is said that after this, the good chemicals will degrade into things not as fun. Thing is, that doesnt make much sense to me. I dont see why things would degrade any faster than just sitting in a jar, unless the plant is pushing out enzymes/catalysts to further chemically change THC etc.
I feel like this is one of those things that was accepted because the experts say so without enough hard evidence. Have people really harvested at clear trichs, amber trichs, and ~2 weeks PAST amber trichs, to super amber, and then compared the chemical profile of cannabinoids? I've never seen it. Maybe clear trichs really have the best. Maybe pushing past amber would make it best.
Please dont comment things like "I've smoked it both ways, I know." Or "all the experts do it this way, clearly it's right." I'm looking for purely objective facts. I dont care about anecdotal stories under the influence of bias/placebo effect
Tl;dr, prove to me that:
1)cannabis pushes out catalysts/enzymes after a certain point in flowering that degrade THC and the like.
2) amber trichomes are actually the most potent cannabinoid profile
I feel like this is one of those things that was accepted because the experts say so without enough hard evidence. Have people really harvested at clear trichs, amber trichs, and ~2 weeks PAST amber trichs, to super amber, and then compared the chemical profile of cannabinoids? I've never seen it. Maybe clear trichs really have the best. Maybe pushing past amber would make it best.
Please dont comment things like "I've smoked it both ways, I know." Or "all the experts do it this way, clearly it's right." I'm looking for purely objective facts. I dont care about anecdotal stories under the influence of bias/placebo effect
Tl;dr, prove to me that:
1)cannabis pushes out catalysts/enzymes after a certain point in flowering that degrade THC and the like.
2) amber trichomes are actually the most potent cannabinoid profile
Last edited: