• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Drug testing for California doctors?

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
http://blog.sfgate.com/matierandross/2013/05/20/drug-testing-for-california-doctors/

They’re calling it the “Pee in the Cup’’ initiative — a proposed state ballot measure that would require doctors to be randomly subjected to drug and alcohol testing, the same way bus drivers are.

It’s being pushed by a tech mogul who’s on a very personal crusade to clean up the state’s medical practices.

Bob Pack is a former AOL and NetZero exec whose 10-year-old son and 7-year-old daughter were struck and killed a decade ago near their Danville home by a driver under the influence of alcohol and prescription pills.

After going public with a campaign to put his kids’ killer behind bars for second-degree murder, Pack turned his attention to helping the state track patient prescriptions and spot “doctor shoppers’’ like the driver in Danville.

After state funding for the effort dried up, Pack tried and failed to qualify a ballot initiative that would have taxed drug companies to pay for the tracking.

Now he’s taking aim at doctors who abuse drugs themselves. He’s enlisted the help of consumer advocate Harvey Rosenfield — the guy behind the landmark 1988 measure regulating the insurance industry — and former Clinton White House adviser Chris Lehane, whose trial lawyer clients have already dropped $2 million into a campaign account.

Pack and his pals are armed with a new poll showing 85 percent of California voters would be on board with random testing of physicians. They’re also touting an article in the prestigious Journal of American Medicine advocating confidential, mandatory testing.

They’re looking to hit the streets this summer with either a single-issue measure or a multi-prong initiative that would also:

–Lift the cap on damages in medical malpractice cases.

–Change the makeup of the state Medical Board, which disciplines bad doctors, to require that a majority come from outside the medical profession.

–And ensure funding for a state database to track what drugs doctors are prescribing —and if they’re being recklessly prescribed.

cont. http://blog.sfgate.com/matierandross/2013/05/20/drug-testing-for-california-doctors/
 
Good luck to him.

Surely a doc can write a prescription for anything they please?
 
If you think your health costs are high just wait until those three initiatives at the end are implemented.......
 
I can see the shared database to ensure people are not getting multiple prescriptions from different doctors. I agree this should be in place.

He should have tried another way to get his original proposal back on the ballet instead of pursuing drug abusing doctors.
Sure they may exist in a small minority, but they're not stupid. They would get doctor friends to prescribe for them, and be legit.
 
–Change the makeup of the state Medical Board, which disciplines bad doctors, to require that a majority come from outside the medical profession.

There's no way that could go wrong, having the state medical board composed of cops and lawyers.
 
Doctors get drug tested by the institutions they represent and insurance groups fwiw, just another useless bill. Testing in their profession isn't "random" its common and routine.
 
There's no way that could go wrong, having the state medical board composed of cops and lawyers.

Yes, it sucks and its getting there. With the new PROP (will link in a bit if I can get it to work), there is the problem coming forth currently of non-medical personel telling docs how much and what they can and cannot prescribe of controlled medications. These non-medical personel are, guess who, the DEA=law enforcement!
 
^
probably "fuck is this why I spent all my college days studying as opposed to those law students/jocks who were always partying and are going to end up deciding how I have to do my job"
 
Top