• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Drug decriminalization would lead to fewer overdoses, addiction: federal study

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Drug decriminalization would lead to fewer overdoses, addiction: federal study

“It is becoming more challenging to justify the criminalization of drug users,” the study says and cites several examples of state policies around the world.

OTTAWA—Alternatives to criminalizing a variety of illicit drugs in Canada could result in lower rates of use and fewer harms such as addiction, overdoses and infectious diseases, says an internal federal study.

The Justice Department research paper stresses there are healthier and less costly ways of addressing the problem of illegal drug use, and that the biggest hurdles might be political — not practical — ones.

“It is becoming more challenging to justify the criminalization of drug users,” the study says.

“Drawing on international evidence, Canada can be a leader in national and international drug policy reform.”

The Canadian Press used the Access to Information Act to obtain a draft copy of the November 2015 study, “Criminalizing Drug Possession and Use: Different Policy Approaches and International Alternatives.”

The Liberal government has promised to legalize, regulate and restrict access to marijuana to keep it out of the hands of children while denying criminals the financial profits.

The current system of prohibition does not stop young people from smoking pot and too many Canadians end up with criminal records for possessing small amounts, the Liberals say.

The previous Conservative government objected to legalizing marijuana, opposed the idea of safe-injection sites for drug users and introduced several mandatory minimum penalties for drug offences.

The study takes a broad look at state policies around the world — including approaches to harder drugs such as cocaine and heroin — and the resulting outcomes. The paper concludes there are successful alternative approaches, including early education, prevention and treatment of those who become users.

It cites several examples, including:

— The Netherlands, where access to syringes and prescribed heroin have been followed by a reduction in petty crime and a drop in the number of dependent drug users;

— Portugal, which has seen fewer opioid-related deaths and HIV/AIDS diagnoses after decriminalization of drug use;

— The United States, where decriminalization of small amounts of cannabis in more than a dozen states in the 1970s did not result in greater increases in use of the drug among adults or adolescents when compared with other states.

The study was initiated in early 2015 by the Justice Department’s research and statistics division — months before the Liberals took office — with the aim of gauging the impact of policy approaches around the globe, said Andrew Gowing, a Justice Department spokesman.

“The government is not currently considering any options related to the possession and use of drugs, other than the legalization and strict regulation of marijuana,” Gowing added.

Still, even the fact the federal government is studying the issue encourages Archie Kaiser, a professor of law and medicine at Dalhousie University who has written about decriminalizing marijuana and advocates a broad-based retreat from the war on drugs.

“You want governments to gradually think about using the same kind of enlightened approach to other drugs,” he said.

But Kaiser cautioned: “With drugs that have a greater likelihood of causing dependence and addiction, and where there are higher risks to users, you may have to have a different blend of policy choices.”

https://www.thestar.com/news/queens...lth-benefits-internal-federal-study-says.html
 
^ there is total logic to it. prohibition keeps the jails full and the jailers coffers full. Its a business and the logic is to make money.

if the jail industry is for profit in canada or not, but they pretty much have to do what the US does so that no other country can demonstrate how legalization improves society and expose how crooked the US is by just keeping drugs illegal as a for profit business....I'm sure they've done the math, and jailing drug users is more profitable that making recreational drugs legal and selling them to citizens, otherwise that is what theyd be doing
 
It's all about the money. Justifies the organs of state power. In the United states if the war on drugs ended where do all those directly employed due to the war on drugs like where do they go ? The situation where there are the criminal organizations of the world and the paramilitary forces of the various states is a nice relationship like its beneficial for the criminals to exist to justify their jobs and the criminal enterprises support the prohibition of drugs because hey presto thats our billion dollar business.

The long and interconnected relations of law enforcement and criminal syndicates is what the status quo wants just like their bullshit war on terrorism where they want to exist these groupings opposed to the western narrative and influence so that the organs of state and establishment can piggy back on the money and power that it brings and ultimately that a select few are entitled to rule over the masses.
 
In my opinion, the entire argument can be analogized into the debate for reducing the drinking age. When you deprive 18+ year old adults of the opportunity to consume alcohol is (more) safe, (more) regulated environments, you immediately encourage the act of binge drinking. Now, their alcohol use has to be a secret, in-private practice before they go out. So, instead of pacing themselves, they have to decide exactly how much Alcohol will last them the entire evening. Sometimes they hit their mark and have a great time and others, they die from Alcohol poisoning.

Thanks to the regulation of Alcohol, we have the ability to say things like "3 Drinks". If you're using Heroin, there's no established "1 Shot" of Heroin. It could be anything. If we could begin regulating these things, it wouldn't eliminate the possibility for overdose, but I guarantee you a lot less people would be.
 
^ but they want overdoses to continue so they can get more tax funding to continue jailing people and making profits.

what I wonder is at what point will the failure be declared about their fake intentions to stop drug use. If drug use stopped totally these billionaires owning the prisons would make a few billion less a year....and that just is not an option....they know it won't stop though bc its human nature....and they know the harder the push the more people will devolve into lives as felons with no hope, job, or life other than to do drugs...which they can then be arrested for and all of us pay 60K a year to keep them caged.

what if we spent the 60K per year per pothead we spend jailing them....to create jobs...a meaning to life for them....maybe the would have something to do besides get high? But that would never happen because that 60k would no longer be going to the prison industry
 
Top