N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand
Yes, but those people still cannot see the full range of UV radiation.Actually, some people CAN see into the UV end of the spectrum, into the near-ultraviolet. This is because they are aphakic, having had the lens of the eye (which blocks UV) removed, or having been born the lens absent, and these people can percieve near-ultraviolet light as a whitish-blue or whitish violet. And other people, are born with tetrachromatic vision, humans normally possess three separate cone cell types (the cones are responsible for perception of color, each sensitive to a separate part of the spectrum, red, green and blue) trichromachy is the most common visual architetcture, not of course counting the rod cells, monochromatic cells sensitive to low light levels but being monochromatic, thats all they do, they perceive greyscale, and are very sensitive to low light levels but useless in bright light in which they lose capacity to respond (temporarily, that is, as they reversibly bleach out)
There has been a research study of a woman (its X-linked seemingly) with true functional tetrachromacy, who can (or could, I have no idea when she was born or if she is still alive, during modern times with respect to research but the date of death is of no import since nothing was reported pertaining to health conditions linked to or correlated with her enhanced color vision.)
percieve many more hues and distinctions in her visual spectrum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachromacy#Humans
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentachromacy This is also interesting.
What I wouldn't give for some genetic tweaking. I have also for a long, long time wondered if by tweaking the structure of vitamin A, or perhaps the portion of beta-carotene, for a safer experiment, in terms of cis- and trans- orientation of the double bonds in the chain of vitamin A, or perhaps chain length or other substitutions, thus altering its absorption spectrum as a chromophore could be used as an orally administered (rather than being injected into the eye, I am not about to go so far as to do an intracular injection of anything, and certainly not repeated ones. Shooting into a vein, IM or subcut is one thing, and I've had an IP injection once (not done myself) and that was less than pleasant. But I am certainly not going to stick my head in a stereotactic frame and push a sharpened steel spike slowly, steadily into my eyeball, pull it out, get another and plunge it slowly and squelchily into my into my OTHER eyeball, with a squelch and a scpplickt-pop as I drag it from within the juicy bit of the globe of my second eye.
But a tweaked beta-carotene or vitamin A, even a topical preparation for the eye, having been designed to facilitate formation of an abnormal 'visual purple' pigment, the retinaldehydes, only having been modified so the resultant photorhodopsins undergo alterations in their active conformations upon irradiation by light and thus (one would hope) conveying enhanced spectral resolution.
Would this be possible? Would be fucking sweet (to use the highly technical term in the optician's jargon) to have the capacity to see into the IR waveband and so have an innate thermal imaging ability, rather than as people do if they wish to view wavelengths into the IR region of the electromagnetic spectrum, wear big bulky thermal imaging goggles or use specialist cameras. I'd be happy with even the greyscale-like IR camera-like vision, but full thermal imaging would be even better.
Yes, but those people still cannot see the full range of UV radiation.
I think the IR vision thing was in Predator. The fact that some IR frequencies can penetrate walls is a good example how we are unable to perceive a really interesting part of the world. The same is true of magnetic and electrical fields. However, if our brain responded to such phenomena then it would require additional sense organs and processing power, but without any real benefit in terms of survival.
Did you read the theory?(Interface Theory of Perception)Seems like we aren't too far off.
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...lant-restores-sense-of-touch-to-paralyzed-man
http://www.pcworld.com/article/209553/Move_a_mouse_cursor_with_your_brain.html
http://www.livescience.com/49991-bionic-eye-implanted-man.html
I mean how hard would it be to program the bionic eye to detect magnetic/radio waves and transmit the signal to the brain in an interpretable way.
Precisely.
Cat eyes (wouldn't mind if it were possible to get surgery in a cosmetic sense also-cat/(some)-snake's eyes' slit pupils.
And recombinant humanized cells from pit viper or boa, say, connected to some spare facial sensory nerves, or perhaps minor olfactory nerve connections to the main olfactory nerve, so as to be able to literally sniff out heat. Artificial lenses for the eyes to filter and regulate the amplitude of UV, but pass near-UV wavelengths.
And if we are going to get a whole bunch of surgery, hell why not magnetosensory perception, somewhere one doesn't need conventional sense of touch, ears, bridge of nose or something, cell-to-neurone grafts of cells containing magnetite particles (perhaps coupled to stretch-activated ion channels, if we are going to theorize about how such alterations could be done) and a fish-like sharks have.
Tell you one thing I'd really like though, with regards to more mundane, cosmetic hacks. a tail. A long, cat-furry, prehensile tail.
The brain integrates multiple streams of sensory input into a coherent unitary construct of reality. The manipulations listed above wouldn't induce new "senses", but rather just provide a few informative cues using existing senses. This isn't really any different then the tools we commonly use everyday -- your phone rings or vibrates when you get a call, and then you know that the antenna on the phone has received a radio transmission from a cell phone tower. But that perception of radio waves isn't integrated into our sensity perception of reality, and doesn't really give us the subjective impression that we can sense radio waves. The same is true with the proposal to link heat sensors to nasal nerves -- it would cue you to the presence of heat, but you would never directly integrate that into your perception of reality in the same was as your existing senses are. In other words, you would never subjectively feel like you were directly sensing heat.Seems like we aren't too far off.
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-...lant-restores-sense-of-touch-to-paralyzed-man
http://www.pcworld.com/article/209553/Move_a_mouse_cursor_with_your_brain.html
http://www.livescience.com/49991-bionic-eye-implanted-man.html
I mean how hard would it be to program the bionic eye to detect magnetic/radio waves and transmit the signal to the brain in an interpretable way.
This would be so sweet, I would do it in a heartbeat.Would this be possible? Would be fucking sweet (to use the highly technical term in the optician's jargon) to have the capacity to see into the IR waveband and so have an innate thermal imaging ability, rather than as people do if they wish to view wavelengths into the IR region of the electromagnetic spectrum, wear big bulky thermal imaging goggles or use specialist cameras. I'd be happy with even the greyscale-like IR camera-like vision, but full thermal imaging would be even better.