• N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | thegreenhand

Chemistry and toxicity of krokodil

AlsoTapered

Bluelighter
Joined
Apr 1, 2023
Messages
3,076

It was not possible to show EVERY intermediate but I have shown the five major points of the scaffolds that undergo modification .i.e.

1 - 3-O-demethylation
2 - 3-deoxygenation
3 - 6-halogenation/dehalogenation
4 - 7-8 reduction
5 - allylic rearrangement and 6-methylation (underlying reaction as yet unknown)

The above image demonstrates most of the intermediates, reactions and toxic reagents/species found in Russian samples of 'krokodil' which isn't a pure compound but a number of actives, inactives and toxins. It's worth looking at the MSDS of CH3I (methyl iodide) and PH3 (phosphine) which are both volatile.

Put simply, phosphorous-containing species intecalanate into the morphinan converting the nor compounds into the coresponding phospinous amide. The KEY detail of phosphoramides is that they are incapable of forming addition salts with appropriate acids.

Similarly the non-selective nature of the reduction also results in the phenolic moiety being reduced (deoxygenated) and as a result the coresponding 3-desoxy species are incapable of forming addition salts with the appropriate bases.

Although the nor compounds are found in samples of krokodil and such compounds have been demonstrated to possess affinity for the MOR, most researchers believe that they do not readily cross the blood-brain barrier and so should considered inactive but non-toxic.

It's interesting (to me) that the CHI3 produced by the N-demethylation can itself react with iodocodeine/iodomorphine to produce the 6-methyl derivatives which are far more potent than the other actives. The 11 samples I have data on suggest yields of:

Deoxymorphine-D (Desomorphine) 21%-24%
Deoxymorphine-C 3%-6%
Methyldesorphine 2%-3.5%

It's important to note that the ULTIMATE fate of all the compounds if sufficient reagents and heating are applied is to undergo the 3-deoxygenation. While certain reactions only apply to intermediates, the various reactions are essentially happening in parallel and so the highest yields are achieved by understanding the optimal conditions (duration, temperature, ratio of reagents) and NOT simply by adding MORE of everything.

Having seen footage of one particularly skilled Russian 'cook', it's evident that some makers were aware of the toxic phosphoramides that are produced using the 'classic' methodology and I think it reasonable to state that avoiding the use of phosphorous greatly reduces the toxicity of the product.

 
Last edited:

Index paper with references to papers containing GC-MS data. The two unidentified spikes are the phospinous amides. After reading the above paper I corresponded with the researchers who went on to identify them both.

It's important to note that isolated cases of people making/using krokodil in many nations, it would appear that the severe damage caused by the impurities have ensured that it's never gained widespread popularity outside of Russia.

People have asked if it's possible to clean the product and the answer is yes - but mechanical losses mean that it's impractical unless one is making quite large amounts. Let us not forget that other drugs made popular by Russian users are tropicamide (nicknamed 'трехмесячный месяц' because users die, on average, after three months of continuous use) and tianeptine - all 3 abused by IV. Those who have played with tianeptine will attest to the dangers of it's IV usage.
 
Top