I don't mean to sound patronising, but if you're taking the MDMA/LSD here simply to avoid the unpleasantness of the LSD, especially by staggering such low doses, then you aren't really going to candyflip, because there's no pay off. Well, maybe a kind of milder variant, or something similar-ish.
And although I would usually say swims method is solid here, I think the low amount of acid means that waiting 3.5 hours might be ineffective. IME, with lower doses of LSD the LSD has lost too much power by the 3-4 hour point, so you need to compensate by taking it earlier, or the MDMA takes the centre stage. But I certainly wouldn't stagger the doses, that just sounded like it wouldn't really work at all.
Again, can you describe your 100ug acid trips? Blotters are notoriously miss-marketed, and effect people differently. How long does it last/what happens? How would you rate it on the shulgin scale? Do you know when the peak usually subsides?
Basically the idea is to take the MDMA just as you're coming off the acid peak (with a full scale acid trip/heavy shulgin level 3 this is about 4 hours). However with lower doses (shulgin level 2) then the acid has really lost enough punch at that point to synergise, so you'd probably want to wait maybe 2 hours or so. I think. 3 hours if its a heavy +2. Maybe somewhere inbetween. The idea is to not stack the peaks, but to ride the subsiding of the acid peak with ecstasy.
I hope I don't sound too cynical or I'm making it sound a drag, candyflilping is absolutely my favourite thing that I've experienced on Earth. Ever. It will be enjoyable, you just need to get the timing right.
Shulgin Scale
- MINUS, n. (-) On the quantitative potency scale (-, ?, +, ++, +++), there were no effects observed.
- PLUS/MINUS, n. (?) The level of effectiveness of a drug that indicates a threshold action. If a higher dosage produces a greater response, then the plus/minus (?) was valid. If a higher dosage produces nothing, then this was a false positive.
- PLUS ONE, n. (+) The drug is quite certainly active. The chronology can be determined with some accuracy, but the nature of the drug's effects are not yet apparent.
- PLUS TWO, n. (++) Both the chronology and the nature of the action of a drug are unmistakably apparent. But you still have some choice as to whether you will accept the adventure, or rather just continue with your ordinary day's plans (if you are an experienced researcher, that is). The effects can be allowed a predominant role, or they may be repressible and made secondary to other chosen activities.
- PLUS THREE, n. (+++) Not only are the chronology and the nature of a drug's action quite clear, but ignoring its action is no longer an option. The subject is totally engaged in the experience, for better or worse.
- PLUS FOUR, n. (++++) A rare and precious transcendental state, which has been called a "peak experience," a "religious experience," "divine transformation," a "state of Samadhi" and many other names in other cultures. It is not connected to the +1, +2, and +3 of the measuring of a drug's intensity. It is a state of bliss, a participation mystique, a connectedness with both the interior and exterior universes, which has come about after the ingestion of a psychedelic drug, but which is not necessarily repeatable with a subsequent ingestion of that same drug. If a drug (or technique or process) were ever to be discovered which would consistently produce a plus four experience in all human beings, it is conceivable that it would signal the ultimate evolution, and perhaps the end, of the human experiment.
