• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

(Australia) Tax toke: the budget office models GST on marijuana

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
85,003
1454157655956.jpg


Just what are they smoking down in the Parliamentary Budget Office?

The normally conservative federal institution has done some highly unusual economic modelling based on the question: how much money could the Turnbull government raise if it legalised and then applied the GST to marijuana?

The answer is about $300 million a year.

And that doesn't even include the increased tax toke – sorry, take – from the inevitable boom in sales of pizza and Doritos.

The PBO, which was set up to provide independent and non-partisan budget analysis to politicians, did the costings at the request of libertarian crossbench senator David Leyonhjelm, who wants marijuana fully legalised.

If such a policy were introduced in July 2017 it would raise $600 million in GST revenue in the first two years, the PBO found.

That money would flow on to the states but the policy would also help the federal government through reduced law enforcement costs.

The government would save about $100 million a year in reduced Australian Federal Police and Australian Border Force costs, the PBO says.

The costing is based on some key assumptions, chiefly that all states and territories would align with the Commonwealth in fully legalising marijuana, hemp growing and the production of hemp for human consumption.

It's also based on there being no restrictions on marijuana production, such as quotas or restrictive licensing.

It also assumes there would be no impact on excise collections from the sale of alcohol or tobacco.

"A number of studies have analysed whether marijuana is a complement to or substitute for alcohol and tobacco. However, the literature has not reached a consensus, with the findings of different studies in conflict," the PBO says.

The impact of the proposal was calculated by applying a 10 per cent GST rate to current estimates of household consumption expenditure on marijuana.

However the PBO predicts the proposal would result in an increase in marijuana supply and demand, from 333 tonnes in 2016-17 to 395 tonnes in 2018-19.

The PBO stressed these costings should be considered "low reliability".

"There is uncertainty regarding the price and quantity of marijuana currently consumed and the price and quantity of marijuana that would be consumed in a newly legalised market," the PBO writes.

"It is also difficult to separately identify marijuana law enforcement activities as these are often integrated within broader law enforcement activities."

Senator Leyonhjelm said he does not recommend the use of marijuana except for medical purposes but recreational use should be for adults to decide for themselves.

"Prohibition has achieved absolutely nothing except tie up police resources and provide revenue for criminal gangs," he said.


Source: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-polit...-marijuana-20160129-gmhjli.html#ixzz3ylpUHJB1
 
When I read that it seems full of plusses to me. Why the fuck not do it?
 
You don't see too many stoned people starting fights.

Driving on the other hand is something else. I don't give two shits what substance you're on, if it alters the mind where you are not in control you shouldn't be driving.

On another note, I reckon for the drugs in the media section we should put the country of where the article is from in brackets and then list the title. On another note, have you ever asked a mod about getting more characters for when writing the title of a thread. It's always short which makes it hard to read the title of the article.
 
Of course, driving under the influence of any drug that effects your coordination and senses is not a good thing. Drugs like nicotine and caffeine aren't a problem though. In terms of cannabis, it is fully legal in Colorado and other places and people drive and the cops test for impairment. Just like they do with alcohol. Or prescription drugs. None of that would change. If we ever get legal weed we would just need awareness campaigns and education about not using it and driving or waiting a certain time after use till driving, say 12 hours I think is a good length. Or hopefully in the future new technology will be created for testing for a certain level of THC in ones system and if you are over that level you cop the same thing as a drunk driver would get. Hopefully we could test our selves like we can with drink driving to see our levels.

Yeah it'd be good to include the country in the title, but as you mentioned it sometimes isn't possible with character limits. I'm not sure why they can't be longer. There is a section you can ask these kinds of questions in though -

http://www.bluelight.org/vb/forums/111-Support
 
Top