• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

AUS: Roadside drug testing convictions up 300 percent

Jabberwocky

Frumious Bandersnatch
Joined
Nov 3, 1999
Messages
84,998
The number of people charged with driving with illicit drugs in their system in NSW has risen 300 per cent following a concerted state government crackdown, according to a report from the state's crime statisticians.

About 9800 people had charges for driving under the influence of drugs finalised in local courts last financial year, compared with 2300 the year prior, according to Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research analysis of court data released on Tuesday. That amounts to a rise of some 320 per cent.

1496114537721.jpg


"It seems likely that the increase in charges is a reflection of increased law enforcement activity rather than an increase in actual drug driving," the report concludes.

That follows a pledge in 2015 by Police Minister Troy Grant to triple the number of roadside drug tests conducted each year to 100,0000.

The crackdown effort has chiefly snared younger men and people from regional NSW, the analysis found.

The rate of convictions in regional NSW is roughly twice the state average. Only one metropolitan area, Sydney's outer-south-west is represented in the 10 parts of the state with the most convictions per capita.
The drug driving push has not been without controversy.

Critics note the law does not measure the point at which drivers are impaired by the presence of drugs in their system and argue drivers could be penalised for having fractional amounts of drugs in their system from consumption that took place long before testing.

Drivers have their saliva swabbed for three types of drugs: cannabis; amphetamines and methamphetamine or "ice"; and MDMA, an amphetamine derivative known commonly as "ecstasy".

Yet the machines used to test drivers' saliva could be used to detect cocaine and benzodiazepines but this functionality is not enabled.

Critics of the state's drug testing regime accuse the police of class bias for choosing not to select for those drugs.

A recent analysis also reportedly showed that tranquiliser-style benzodiazepines were the most common contributing factor to traffic accidents in NSW despite not being tested in roadside drug tests.

The crackdown has also greatly increased the risk of overrunning local courts, the report found.

Drug driving cases have risen to the 12th most commonly finalised matter in local courts each year from the 50th most common.

More than 98 per cent of people charged with offences are found guilty.

Men accounted for nearly eight in 10 drug driving convictions, with a slightly higher proportion of overall offenders aged under 45.

Convicted offenders have their licences suspended for a mandatory minimum period of six months for their first offence except in cases where a magistrate waives a conviction with a section 10 bond, as happens in about 30 per cent of cases.

About two-thirds of those convicted received a fine, of about $470, on average, for their first offence.


Source: http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/roadside-...0-per-cent-in-nsw-report-20170530-gwg6im.html
 
Critics of the state's drug testing regime accuse the police of class bias for choosing not to select for those drugs.

lol.

I've been out of the drug scene for years now but I remember Cocaine hitting upwards of $300 a gram, so I can sort of see this argument holding weight but I think the real reason is it's not common enough.
 
As the federal government prepares to introduce a controversial drug-testing program targeting welfare recipients, new data has revealed gaping holes in existing police mobile drug-testing regimes.

An analysis of drug-related road crashes in NSW over the past three years has found that the drug most commonly involved in both fatal and non-fatal accidents isn’t even tested for by police.

According to data from the Centre for Road Safety, obtained by the NSW Greens through the Government Information (Public Access) Act, benzodiazepines — more commonly known as benzos — are the most common drugs involved in road crashes.

Benzos are generally prescribed by doctors to treat anxiety and sleep disorders. You’re probably more familiar with them referred to by their popular brand names: Valium and Xanax. According to the Centre for Road Safety data, 524 crashes between 2014 and 2016 involved drivers with benzos in their system. That’s almost one-third of all drug related crashes in that period.

However, despite the large number of crashes involving the drug, police do not test for benzos when they conduct mobile drug tests. Police drug-testing units only test for cannabis, MDMA and amphetamines.

Police have previously been criticised for these tests — not just because of the arbitrary selection of drugs they test for, but also because they test for trace amounts of drug residue regardless of whether it impacts the ability of the driver. Last month Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews was copped a blasting on social media after releasing a video defending the use of mobile drug-testing units.

VIC Premier Daniel Andrews Is Getting Roasted Over This Heavy-Handed Drug-Driving Ad

After benzos, the most common drugs implicated in road crashes were methamphetamine and cannabis. The number of crashes involving drivers with either cocaine or MDMA in their system was roughly equivalent, however cocaine use is also not picked up by mobile drug tests.

According to federal government data, Australians from wealthier backgrounds use cocaine at a rate three times higher than those from lower-socioeconomic backgrounds. Conversely, Australians from lower-socioeconomic backgrounds are more likely to use methamphetamine.

That disparity has led the NSW Greens to argue the current drug testing regime is “about politics and social engineering”. The party’s justice spokesperson, David Shoebridge, said that “It is astounding that the police’s drug-testing excludes both benzodiazepines and cocaine while targeting cannabis and MDMA.”

Shoebridge successfully requested the data from the Centre for Road Safety and said that “We decided to press for the actual crash data rather than rely on police spin and what it shows is pretty remarkable. We got all this data, not from information collected by police at the roadside, but from the testing done in ambulances and hospitals after there has been a crash.

“The police and the Coalition government aren’t testing drivers for the drugs like benzos and cocaine that tend to be taken by middle- and upper-class Australia. This is despite the fact we can see they are serious contributors to road accidents,” he said. “Instead the police focus is on drugs like cannabis and MDMA that are more commonly taken by people young people and people on lower incomes.”

Like the police-operated mobile drug tests, the proposed new federal government drug test for welfare recipients will only test for cannabis, MDMA and methamphetamine. That means cocaine users, who tend to be from higher-socioeconomic backgrounds, won’t be captured by the system.

Junkee asked the NSW Police why their mobile drug testing regime doesn’t test for benzos and cocaines, pointing to the Centre for Road Safety data. The police said that while they administer the tests, the “process belongs to the Centre for Road Safety and as such it would not be appropriate for us to comment”.

The Centre for Road Safety has not responded to our inquiries.

http://junkee.com/politics-social-engineering-police-drug-tests-target-poor/105816
 
Top