blueberries
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2011
- Messages
- 339
Ok, so I was reading about an aMT/Cathinone crossover project that yielded incredible results (supposedly). This got me thinking to the body-load quelling properties of beta ketones. So if bk-aMT was so good, why not try 5-MeO-bk-aMT? Or even 5-HO?
Then we come to pyr-T. This could also do with some smoothening out, so bk-pyr-T it is, and the corresponding 5-MeO (which actually managed to give visuals, unlike aMT).
This is starting to feel like an amphetamine now and with the addition of aET holding similar effects to it's corresponding PEA, would the addition of pyr-T create a a-PBP type compound? Additionally it would hold minor psychedelic and empathogenic effects too.
From this point in thinking we have corresponding analogues to the pyrollidines.
aP-pyr-T = a-PVP and so on.
A 5-MeO on top would be the corresponding 4-MeO **in theory**. However I think it would raise potency rather than lowering it like the PVs.
At the end of the day the most basic compounds would be:
bk-aMT
bk-pyr-T
5-MeO-aMT - PMA
5-MeO-bk-aMT - Methedrone
5-MeO-bk-pyr-T - MOPEP
5-MeO-bk-aM-pyr-T - MOPPP
5-MeO-bk-aP-pyr-T - MOPVP
Those of you thinking pyr-T looks horrible, look up PEP as that's the equivalent. It has not been studied due to it being fairly worthless, as is pyr-T but once you add an alpha group it gets interesting.
So you could build it up in the same way as pyrovalerones; 5-Methyl/Fluoro/Methoxy-bk-alpha-Me/Et/Pr/Bu/Pe/Hx - pyr-T
This would equal: 4-Methyl/Fluoro/Methoxy-bk-alpha- P /B /V /H /Hp/O - Pyrollidine (phenone)
This is just theory still, however. I reckon 5-MeO-bk-aE-pyr-T would be the best next to the alpha methyl. The rest would probably become inactive (unless the pyrollidine ring lets the extended chains gain potency in the same way). Effects would be felt somewhere between 5 and 30mg and be euphoric, slightly hallucinogenic and a stimulant, with no body load or unpleasantness. But as testing new compounds goes; always titrate up. So bk-aMT. Should be fairly easy, legal and (from what I hear) incredible.
On the same subject; Pentedrone...do you think it could be similar too?
Then we come to pyr-T. This could also do with some smoothening out, so bk-pyr-T it is, and the corresponding 5-MeO (which actually managed to give visuals, unlike aMT).
This is starting to feel like an amphetamine now and with the addition of aET holding similar effects to it's corresponding PEA, would the addition of pyr-T create a a-PBP type compound? Additionally it would hold minor psychedelic and empathogenic effects too.
From this point in thinking we have corresponding analogues to the pyrollidines.
aP-pyr-T = a-PVP and so on.
A 5-MeO on top would be the corresponding 4-MeO **in theory**. However I think it would raise potency rather than lowering it like the PVs.
At the end of the day the most basic compounds would be:
bk-aMT
bk-pyr-T
5-MeO-aMT - PMA
5-MeO-bk-aMT - Methedrone
5-MeO-bk-pyr-T - MOPEP
5-MeO-bk-aM-pyr-T - MOPPP
5-MeO-bk-aP-pyr-T - MOPVP
Those of you thinking pyr-T looks horrible, look up PEP as that's the equivalent. It has not been studied due to it being fairly worthless, as is pyr-T but once you add an alpha group it gets interesting.
So you could build it up in the same way as pyrovalerones; 5-Methyl/Fluoro/Methoxy-bk-alpha-Me/Et/Pr/Bu/Pe/Hx - pyr-T
This would equal: 4-Methyl/Fluoro/Methoxy-bk-alpha- P /B /V /H /Hp/O - Pyrollidine (phenone)
This is just theory still, however. I reckon 5-MeO-bk-aE-pyr-T would be the best next to the alpha methyl. The rest would probably become inactive (unless the pyrollidine ring lets the extended chains gain potency in the same way). Effects would be felt somewhere between 5 and 30mg and be euphoric, slightly hallucinogenic and a stimulant, with no body load or unpleasantness. But as testing new compounds goes; always titrate up. So bk-aMT. Should be fairly easy, legal and (from what I hear) incredible.
On the same subject; Pentedrone...do you think it could be similar too?