• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

‘A description of hell’: OxyContin makers downplayed addiction, hyped effectiveness –

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
‘A description of hell’: OxyContin makers downplayed addiction, hyped effectiveness – report

OxyContin became the best-selling US pain-killer based on its maker’s claim that its effect lasts for 12 hours. An investigation has now cast doubts on those claims, however, while warning of the dangers of one of the most abused drugs in US history.

An extended-effect version of the generic painkiller oxycodone, OxyContin made its debut in 1996 and peaked in popularity in 2010. Doctors across the US wrote 5.4 million prescriptions for the medication in 2014, and the total profits from the drug have been estimated at $31 billion.

Yet the key to the drug’s market dominance and high price point hinged on the claim that it controlled pain for a full 12 hours, which was problematic from the very beginning, according to an extensive investigative report published on Thursday by the Los Angeles Times.

Purdue Pharma, the Connecticut-based makers of OxyContin, answered the paper’s questions with a one-page statement which pointed out that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved Oxy as a 12-hour drug.

“Scientific evidence amassed over more than 20 years, including more than a dozen controlled clinical studies, supports FDA’s approval of 12-hour dosing for OxyContin,” Purdue’s chief medical officer, Dr. Gail Cawkwell, told the Times.

Documents obtained by the paper, however, indicate that the company was aware that the drug wore off long before the advertised period ended, but insisted on a 12-hour dosage to maintain profitability. The paper has reviewed thousands of pages of confidential documents obtained from court cases and government investigations, including many records that had been sealed by the courts.

Spanning almost three decades from the mid-1980s to 2011, the documents include emails, memos, meeting minutes, sales reports, and sworn testimonies from Purdue employees.

The Sackler family, which owns Purdue Pharma, was already wealthy. The success of OxyContin boosted their net worth to $14 billion – ahead of such American dynasties as the Rockefellers and the Mellons, Forbes magazine noted in 2015.

OxyContin was envisioned as a replacement for Purdue’s signature product, the extended-duration morphine pain reliever MS Contin, which was reaching the end of its patent protection. The proprietary technique for extending the drug’s release was then applied to an old, cheap drug called oxycodone and used in short-term pain relievers such as Percocet.

In 1989, Purdue tested the new drug on women recovering from abdominal and genital surgery in Puerto Rico. The study found that OxyContin was safe, relieved pain, and lasted longer than short-acting painkillers – but not quite up to 12 hours, as Purdue continued to advertise.

“Even before OxyContin went on the market, clinical trials showed many patients weren’t getting 12 hours of relief. Since the drug’s debut in 1996, the company has been confronted with additional evidence, including complaints from doctors, reports from its own sales reps, and independent research,” the Times noted.

As OxyContin is a chemical cousin of heroin, when it ran out, some patients would experience “excruciating symptoms of withdrawal, including an intense craving for the drug,” the paper added.

Elizabeth Kipp was 42 when she was first prescribed OxyContin in 1996. The stay-at-home mom from Kansas had suffered from back pain since she was thrown off a horse at the age of 14. She was told to take the drug every 12 hours. Relief would last for 3 to 4 hours, and then the pain would return. Her doctor kept increasing the dosage of the medication, but not the frequency. It did not help.

“You want a description of hell,” Kipp told the LA Times. “I can give it to you.”

Documents show that Purdue representatives and sales managers strongly objected to physicians prescribing Oxy with greater frequency, urging them to increase the dosage instead. A November 1996 letter from a regional manager in Atlanta urged a district sales manager to train representatives to convince physicians that “there is no need to do this, and that 100% of the patients in the studies had pain relief on a q12h dosing regimen.”

By 2000, Purdue had analyzed data revealing that almost 28 percent of OxyContin prescriptions instructed patients to take it every eight hours or even more frequently. “These numbers are very scary,” managers warned sales representatives during one workshop.

One manager sent out a note stating that the practice of 8-hour dosing “needs to be nipped in the bud. NOW!!”

Dr. David Egilman, a Brown University professor of family medicine who served as an expert for the plaintiffs in many lawsuits against Purdue, called the 12-hour schedule an “addiction producing machine.”

OxyContin is widely blamed for setting off an opioid abuse epidemic that has claimed over 199,000 lives in the US since 1999. In 2007, the company and three top executives pleaded guilty to fraud for downplaying the drug’s risks of addiction, and were ordered to pay $635 million in fines.

If people took Oxy more often than their doctors instructed, “I don’t see where that’s my problem,” Purdue senior medical director, Dr. J. David Haddox, told a reporter in 2001.

It was a problem for Burgess MacNamara, who was a 27-year-old gym teacher in Orlando, Florida when he began taking OxyContin following knee surgery.

“The first six hours, it is awesome,” he told the LA Times. Then the effect would begin to wear off and he would become obsessed with his next dose. “That’s all you think about. Your whole day revolves around that.”

MacNamara eventually turned to heroin, lost his teaching career, and spent 19 months behind bars on drug charges. “Death was looking real good to me,” he said.

The FDA approved Purdue’s application for OxyContin in 1995. Dr. Curtis Wright, who led the agency’s review of the drug, declined to comment for the LA Times article. He left the FDA shortly after OxyContin’s approval and, within two years, was working for Purdue in new product development, the Times reported, citing his sworn testimony from a 2006 lawsuit. FDA officials declined the paper’s requests for an interview.

https://www.rt.com/usa/342143-oxycontin-12hour-deception-addicition/?
 
Its coming kiddoes.. shame and disgrace... hope it was worth it.. all the lies you told yourselfs.. and for what.. something that turned out to be worthless.. not your drug, what you received?
Directed at oxyfamily
 
Last edited:
What an outstanding opioid Oxycodone is. If I'd have an unlimited amount to consume, I'd give it two thumbs up!

Naughty OxyContin family - perhaps they should receive more than a financial slap on the wrist, but hey, that's just wishful thinking in this two-tiered criminal justice system we got over yonder.
 
As stated in another thread. All the bad press BS against opiate pain meds is gonna end up with CDC pulling them off the market for good and remove decisions from Pain management Dr's who treat people for serious cases of Chronic Pain! Damn Govt always needs to stick their nose into everything-claiming its causing deaths across the country. As if all these meds jumped out of their bottles into the open mouths of pain patients!!

I am a 90% Disabled Veteran who volunteered to go to Iraq for my Country, got blown up by a massive IED, came back with a jacked up body & mind, and now that same Govt is about to tell me I don't know what cures my own pain, or that I am not responsible enough to take pain meds! Ok, off my soap box. Sorry. I have the greatest Pain Management Doc Ive EVER found and even he told me the CDC is clamping down on all of them and their prescription writing abilities for the worst pain cases they have. Damn shame. :(
 
As stated in another thread. All the bad press BS against opiate pain meds is gonna end up with CDC pulling them off the market for good and remove decisions from Pain management Dr's who treat people for serious cases of Chronic Pain! Damn Govt always needs to stick their nose into everything-claiming its causing deaths across the country. As if all these meds jumped out of their bottles into the open mouths of pain patients!!

I am a 90% Disabled Veteran who volunteered to go to Iraq for my Country, got blown up by a massive IED, came back with a jacked up body & mind, and now that same Govt is about to tell me I don't know what cures my own pain, or that I am not responsible enough to take pain meds! Ok, off my soap box. Sorry. I have the greatest Pain Management Doc Ive EVER found and even he told me the CDC is clamping down on all of them and their prescription writing abilities for the worst pain cases they have. Damn shame. :(

I feel for you, I apologize for your pain. I believe your story.

Unfortunately your story is a dime a dozen and with addictions anybody will add any twist to their story to make it that much more sad. I'm NOT saying your story isn't true, just that most people with an opioid addiction will argue that their DOC is medically necessary for any number of reasons.

The bad press, IMO, is a good thing. When this country finally, if ever, gets a grip on the practice of over-prescribing addictions to people our attitudes will change. We'll think about the old days and how bad they were. I truly believe that. In the individual's eyes the drugs are good (to feel good and also avoid sickness) but looking at the "greater good" or the people as a whole, the community, this stuff is shit and should be tightly controlled.

No one likes facing their addiction. Myself included.

Edit - Just to reiterate, I believe you! This is not entirely a response to you! I spent a couple years living with my best friend who was paralyzed from the chest down, very limited motion in his arms and hands. Due to spinal injuries (struck, while walking, by a drunk driver) he had pain constantly and I do believe certain situations call for intensive opioid regimens. I'm NOT saying your case doesn't call for that.
Just that anybody, even with just a toothache, will argue their "medication" is necessary if they are addicted to it.
 
I feel that people in intense pain should be able to take what they wish. There is a direct connection between intense chronic pain and suicide. The fact that it is not doctors, but politicians rallying to get opiates taken away is pretty telling that they themselves have never been in terrible pain.

If you take someone's pills away, they will try heroin, or get them illegally which is what makes them dangerous. This is evidenced by the heroin epidemic we have in the states right now.
 
I feel for you, I apologize for your pain. I believe your story.

Unfortunately your story is a dime a dozen and with addictions anybody will add any twist to their story to make it that much more sad. I'm NOT saying your story isn't true, just that most people with an opioid addiction will argue that their DOC is medically necessary for any number of reasons.

The bad press, IMO, is a good thing. When this country finally, if ever, gets a grip on the practice of over-prescribing addictions to people our attitudes will change. We'll think about the old days and how bad they were. I truly believe that. In the individual's eyes the drugs are good (to feel good and also avoid sickness) but looking at the "greater good" or the people as a whole, the community, this stuff is shit and should be tightly controlled.

No one likes facing their addiction. Myself included.

Edit - Just to reiterate, I believe you! This is not entirely a response to you! I spent a couple years living with my best friend who was paralyzed from the chest down, very limited motion in his arms and hands. Due to spinal injuries (struck, while walking, by a drunk driver) he had pain constantly and I do believe certain situations call for intensive opioid regimens. I'm NOT saying your case doesn't call for that.
Just that anybody, even with just a toothache, will argue their "medication" is necessary if they are addicted to it.

Your type of argument stems from the premise that opioid (or any other substance) consumption is inherently bad and should be avoided. It's a biased and, quite honestly, stupid moral stance. Opioids are among the safest drugs - they do not impair the person much, they're non-toxic. The only problem with them is they're heavily dependence-forming, but that is not a problem if the opioid is easily accessible.

If a person feels that some sort of medication helps them (even psychologically) and allows them to live a more productive and enjoyable life, then who are we to deny them that? Just because it seems to you that it may be problematic? Or immoral? I like what Carl Sagan said of this about cannabis for terminally-ill people. What are we trying to protect them from? From possible addiction, even if they're going to die soon and just wish to get rid of the pain?
 
If we are going to make things morally wrong for how dependence forming and addictive they are....alcohol and tobacco are probably the worst.
 
Gunny again here.
Appreciated the comments-both the "negative" and "positive" types. Never claimed I wasn't dependent on them-which I totally am, and my tolerance is ridiculous! (Which IMHO is how many accidental ODs occur. Just adding 1 more to the initial intake each time could be the last time.

And I most definitely agree they are safe when taken responsibly & do not impair an individual. I can function perfectly an hour after taking 15 of them (And yes my tolerance is HIGH!)

Hey, why isn't there a method of showing "Thanks" or a "like" button here on this forum?
 
You know not to defend these guys but they dropped the ball on this. I understand why they wanted to keep the 12 hour thing going in order to push people into higher and more expensive strengths but it doesnt take a math genius to see every 8 hours means 90 tabs a month. Adjust prices so that for every q8h dosing of the lower strength equals or exceeds the cost q12h for the subsequent higher dose. Then market the hell out of it.
 
Because they were trying to get the patients on higher doses which cost more and are more profitable.
 
Gaz_hmmmm, prices escalate in the States according to a dosage so taking two 40mgs or two 20mgs and two 10mgs is more expensive than taking three 20mgs.

I have been at q8h dosing for OxyContin and here price doesn't escalate but instead keeps getting cheaper when dosage per pill is increased. 28 pack of 20mgs also costs around same as going to a Pizza Hut by yourself.
 
Thats true in this case but not always. Pfizer prices many drugs the same regardless of dose if they know it moves.
 
Here in the UK OxyContin are manufactured exactly like the old 1996 Purdue Oxies i.e. crush and swallow/snort.

I think it's Teva that has the license to make'em here in the UK from Purdue but the patent has ended so generics are available.
I've only ever had the green 80mg's and a chocolatey red/brown 60mg Purdue licensed ones.

Because we don't have high rates of prescription opioid abuse here in the UK there is also a light blue oblong 120mg which I assume are like the others in that you can crush and it becomes dangerously instant release.
I know in the US there was a greeny coloured 160mg but it was stopped because too many people were OD'ing on them.
I remember Phreex/Phree-X saying that a pharmacy he went to had a large bottle if them but could no longer prescribe them and was waiting for them to expire so they could legally dispose them. Such a waste.
 
As stated in another thread. All the bad press BS against opiate pain meds is gonna end up with CDC pulling them off the market for good and remove decisions from Pain management Dr's who treat people for serious cases of Chronic Pain! Damn Govt always needs to stick their nose into everything-claiming its causing deaths across the country. As if all these meds jumped out of their bottles into the open mouths of pain patients!!

I am a 90% Disabled Veteran who volunteered to go to Iraq for my Country, got blown up by a massive IED, came back with a jacked up body & mind, and now that same Govt is about to tell me I don't know what cures my own pain, or that I am not responsible enough to take pain meds! Ok, off my soap box. Sorry. I have the greatest Pain Management Doc Ive EVER found and even he told me the CDC is clamping down on all of them and their prescription writing abilities for the worst pain cases they have. Damn shame. :(

Must feel infuriatingly patronizing for the country's government who you've bled for to deny you the right to complete proper treatment. You and every other veteran who is suffering needlessly as a result of a corrupt government should be a lesson to every able-bodied American who wishes to sign up to think twice about putting their lives on the line for a bunch of corporate whores who have a permanent hard on for 'liberating' another sovereign nation cold-blooded political chess.
 
Top