• DPMC Moderators: thegreenhand | tryptakid
  • Drug Policy & Media Coverage Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Drug Busts Megathread Video Megathread

Her Name Was Rachel Hoffman

LogicSoDeveloped

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 12, 2010
Messages
3,429
Rachel Hoffman was young. Oh, she was so very young. And like many young people in college, she smoked some marijuana and occasionally used ecstasy. She might have even dealt both on a small scale. She was also a promising master’s program student at Florida State University who was deservedly cherished by her proud family. One night, she was stopped by cops and busted for some weed she had in her car.

During the booking photo process, Rachel’s mugshot shows tears streaming down her face with a forlorn look to the side. There’s a slight tint of anger and confusion as well, as is to be expected of anyone who actually thought the Drug War wasn’t real… until it touched their lives directly.

A few months later, Rachel’s apartment was searched and up turned some 5 or so ounces of cannabis and 4-6 ecstasy pills, according to various reports. Tallahassee Police attempted to convince her to turn over marijuana dealers in exchange for dropped charges but she refused. They didn’t relent and pressured her to participate in a drug sting. They wanted her to buy a gun, two ounces of cocaine and an astonishing 1,500 pills of ecstasy. If she did this, she wouldn’t incur any further charges from the drugs found in her apartment. They would give her $13,000 in cash to complete the transaction. She was 23, had no police training whatsoever and was scared to death. She was right to be.

The day of the sting, I am sure Rachel was frightened but probably did what most of us do in stressful situations – we talk ourselves down, take stock of what we’ve got and try to get some perspective in order to finish a job and be done with it. She knew that almost twenty cops were watching, listening through her wire and perhaps if everything went right, she could go home and spend the rest of the day with her boyfriend; this whole weird and scary situation a thing of the past. She could get on with her life.

Well, “shit got crazy,” on May 7, 2008, according to one cop after he confronted Rachel’s surprised boyfriend at their apartment after police lost track of her during the sting. They thought perhaps she made off with the $13,000. He thought she was with them but two days later, Rachel’s body was found in a ditch fifty miles away in Perry, Florida. She was shot five times point blank in the chest and once in the head. When she was found, her Grateful Dead sweatshirt was shrouded over her. Yes, six holes in her body and in a ditch with her favorite jam band shirt. She wanted to become a chef and teach troubled kids how to cook while providing therapy in a practical but fun setting. She, Rachel Morningstar Hoffman, with the big, toothy smile who liked to spin in circles at festivals and wanted to help troubled kids have a better life. Murdered. Executed. Just like that.

According to Prison Legal News:

“The government does not nor is it obligated to keep track of the informants it creates, how many crimes they commit, or how many crimes they help solve. While the federal government has started keeping some records, most state and local governments simply have no mechanism for counting their snitches” but “(drug) enforcement is the biggest generator of informants.

Police, prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges all describe drug cases as relying on or creating informants in one way or another: informants typically provide information or make controlled buys; once arrested, drug suspects routinely become informants themselves; and a drug defendant’s cooperation may be the single largest factor in negotiating a plea bargain or determining a sentence. Indeed, some police assert that they could not investigate drug cases without informants. Since drug cases make up about one third of the U.S. criminal justice system—the largest single type of case—this means that a large percentage of our criminal process is heavily dependent on informant use.”

Two men, Deneilo Bradshaw and Andrea Green, intended to rob Rachel but when they discovered she was wearing a wire, executed her under a canopy of woods and Spanish moss with the same gun she was supposed to buy from them. But arguably, the police using her as an informant are just as, if not more, guilty of her murder.

In a statement to the Tampa Tribune shortly after her death and prior to her funeral, her stepfather said:

“The reality is, untrained civilians of any age should not be put in that position by a police force, and they put a 23-year-old relatively naïve person in a life-threatening situation”.

On May 7, please remember Rachel Hoffman. Do not ever, ever forget her and the thousands of countless others who are killed in the line of duties they ought never have participated. Each year, there should to be vigils for her and countless others who were put into these impossible situations and lost their lives.

Nora Callahan of The November Coalition, a non-profit organization of grassroots volunteers educating the public about the destructive increase in prison population in the United States due to our current drug laws, suggest that perhaps along with vigilance, all of us on May 7th (a Tuesday), ask our officials for their rules and procedures with regard to the use of informants. Ask, “How old are they? What criminal histories? What are the rules? How much money are they paid? Do they sell drugs? If so, how many drugs — what kind and number? Can you measure success? What is considered success? How many communities would do that all the same day?”.

We need to keep their feet to the flames, let them all know we are watching and counting, that we want to stop burying their “collateral damage”. This War on Drugs is a War on People and we cannot wait for another Rachel Hoffman to be found in a ditch, her dreams evaporated like the heat from her body after she was cast aside like a piece of trash.

source:
http://ladybud.com/her-name-was-rachel-hoffman/
 
Last edited:
I feel kinda bad for saying this, but had she succeeded at narcing, I probably would have thought she deserved this outcome instead.
 
Sad story but she played with fire and got burned
 
She was pressured into it, people. I'm sure the police very convincingly stated that her life would be worse than simply over if she did not comply, and that the people who she was supposed to rat on weren't harmless like her friends (that part was evidently true). Your average college student isn't some trained warrior ready to give up everything, especially when it's not entirely clear that doing so would really help anyone.
 
Your local college student-and anyone else charged with a crime-should seek advice from an attorney before saying ANYTHING to police after being charged with a crime.

"I refuse to answer any questions without my attorney present."

Repeat after me.

"I refuse to answer any questions without my attorney present."

Do not trust law enforcement, they are not asking questions to help you, they are only trying to make their own jobs easier. By refusing to admit anything, you are doing yourself and your attorney a big favor.

I got myself out of a simple possession of cocaine charge-I've never done coke, long story-simply by not admitting that I was in possession of any drugs, even when the officer continued to tell me to tell him what the residue was from in my cellophane.

Now obviously not talking isn't going to get you out of trouble-don't rely on not talking and then walking...but when they say "any information you provide can be used against you in a court of law," they mean it.
 
Last edited:
Your local college student-and anyone else charged with a crime-should seek advice from an attorney before saying ANYTHING to police after being charged with a crime.

"I refuse to answer any questions without my attorney present."

Repeat after me.

"I refuse to answer any questions without my attorney present."

Do not trust law enforcement, they are not asking questions to help you, they are only trying to make their own jobs easier. By refusing to admit anything, you are doing yourself and your attorney a big favor.

I got myself out of a simple possession of cocaine charge-I've never done coke, long story-simply by not admitting that I was in possession of any drugs, even when the officer continued to tell me to tell him what the residue was from in my cellophane.

Now obviously not talking isn't going to get you out of trouble-don't rely on not talking and then walking...but when they say "any information you provide can be used against you in a court of law," they mean it.

The problem with that is when the cops pressure uninformed kids into the decision, if you ever watch any of those shitty cop shows, they always say 'if you wanna get rid of the charge, you need to work for us RIGHT NOW,' if you wait the opportunity will be lost, etc etc' and some poor college chick like this one isn't going to know what to do, she probably never thought in a million years she'd be in that situation, she just wanted to get rid of the charges so she wouldn't lose her future.
 
The problem with that is when the cops pressure uninformed kids into the decision, if you ever watch any of those shitty cop shows, they always say 'if you wanna get rid of the charge, you need to work for us RIGHT NOW,' if you wait the opportunity will be lost, etc etc' and some poor college chick like this one isn't going to know what to do, she probably never thought in a million years she'd be in that situation, she just wanted to get rid of the charges so she wouldn't lose her future.

She had 5 ounces from what the article says...I would guess she did some distribution of some sort. I'm sorry but drug dealing isn't for kids. She did not deserve death but you'd think she'd know something would happened to her if she fucked over gangsters cause even though students might play by some rules, the people who have their bread and butter through distribution take their jobs very seriously.
 
Last edited:
I feel kinda bad for saying this, but had she succeeded at narcing, I probably would have thought she deserved this outcome instead.

I dunno man, it is so extremely easy for the media to turn the 'snitches get stitches' attitude into drugs killed this girl...evil, evil drugs..' that saying stuff like that on a board that advocates policy reform likely does way more harm than good. I would not be surprised if a lot of people within the system secretly like the violence that comes with prohibition because it allows them to keep scaring the public away from really getting to the bottom of the drug debate. The girl would not have snitched had she not broken a law that should not exist, and these dudes would not have been so eager to give her bullet holes if not for the same laws forcing them to be criminals as well as drug sellers. Prohibition manipulates a lot of people into worse versions of themselves, when a lot of drugs actually have so much potential to better us. The real sins are the ones committed to set up and maintain this system that does so much more harm than good.

Kinda makes me sad to see a PD mod saying such a thing. Would you wish death on this girl if drugs were legal? Hell no. Don't let the filth ruin your karma. Another reason to argue for reform - spare future generations of people from having to even think like this at all and bring back the peace and the love.

P.S. No hard feelings at all.
 
Last edited:
everyone involved in this incident was incredibly dumb. Especially the killers, who went on a shopping spree with her credit cards! The $11,000 wasn't enough for them? They couldn't have taken the money and left her to walk back home?

A friend of mine had to learn this the hard way: if you live in a small town, don't commit murders there! The cops will never stop investigating them.
 
The girl would not have snitched had she not broken a law that should not exist
That is where I keep going in my mind as well.
Snitching was a bad choice, but she certainly didn't deserve what she got.

From the article:
This War on Drugs is a War on People and we cannot wait for another Rachel Hoffman to be found in a ditch, her dreams evaporated like the heat from her body after she was cast aside like a piece of trash.
Those sick fucks! They just can't wait for another girl to be found dead!
(sarcasm, intended to lighten this heavy discussion a bit)
 
Kinda makes me sad to see a PD mod saying such a thing. Would you wish death on this girl if drugs were legal? Hell no. Don't let the filth ruin your karma. Another reason to argue for reform - spare future generations of people from having to even think like this at all and bring back the peace and the love.

It's depressing, she didn't deserve death, and I'd prefer to live in a world where this didn't happen yeah, but that's not the world we live in. I may be a PDer, but IRL my associations were with tweakers and junkies, not psychedelic folk, and I'm just saying it's drug ethics 101 that you don't snitch, even if you have to serve time in lieu of sleazy assholes you hate.
 
She was pressured into it, people.

Am I supposed to feel sorry for her though?

What do you think is going to happen if you're caught snitching? They'll just pressure you to snitch on the police? Nope, they'll kill you, it's pretty self-explanatory. 8(
 
guide to dealing with cops:

be respectful

know your rights and stand up for them

do not ever self-incriminate or provide or admit to knowledge of others crimes

do not lie if possible. (be as truthful as possible, but withhold certain things)

stick to your story and never change it.
 
do not lie if possible. (be as truthful as possible, but withhold certain things)

It's better to say "I don't want to talk to you" than to lie to a cop to be completely honest.

And the fact is, beyond telling a cop your name, and showing them proof of insurance/license (if you are pulled over in a car), you really don't have to talk to the police at all. There might even be certain states where you don't have to tell the cops your name, I'm not sure about that though.
 
It's better to say "I don't want to talk to you" than to lie to a cop to be completely honest.

And the fact is, beyond telling a cop your name, and showing them proof of insurance/license (if you are pulled over in a car), you really don't have to talk to the police at all. There might even be certain states where you don't have to tell the cops your name, I'm not sure about that though.
refusing to provide basic information can lead to suspicion. dealing with cops is bad, and it is best to keep them on your side and avoid arousing a policeman's yearning to be a detective and investigate something.

If you are driving to the grocery store to buy pizza because your high and the cops pull you over, it is easier to say your are going to buy groceries, than it is to say "I don't want to talk to you" when they ask where you are going.
 
what a fucked up world we live in. the people who are supposed to "protect and serve" us ruin people lives and reputations for using drugs and then on top of it cant even do their jobs themselves so they scare people into working for them and put them in extremely dangerous situations, which in this case led to someone's death.

the girl never should have agreed to snitch that's just common sense but the cops that put her in that situation deserve far worse than what she got
 
Top